pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: StockXpert Images on Photos.com  (Read 97886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #525 on: September 10, 2008, 09:11 »
0
Nothing this month, even views,nothing...

I have 130 images there, isn't too many but... :-\
« Last Edit: September 10, 2008, 09:13 by borg »


« Reply #526 on: September 10, 2008, 09:56 »
0
Question: Am I happy that I opted out of this rubbish from day one?

Answer: You bet!  ;D ;D ;D

vonkara

« Reply #527 on: September 10, 2008, 13:24 »
0
First one from photos.com. A nasty subscription ::). Where's my 50$ :)

digiology

« Reply #528 on: September 10, 2008, 13:42 »
0
What size was it sold for Vonkara? Anything over 3300 longest side should be PPD and not subscription.

Quote
Just to reiterate, on Photos.com, only "Super", "Ultra", and EPS sized files are sold as PPDs and ELs. An image is categorized as "Super" if its longest side has a length between 3300 and 4824 pixels. An image is categorized as "Ultra" if its longest side is longer than 4824 pixels.

I am still waiting for my sizes to be fixed. Any update Steve-Oh?

vonkara

« Reply #529 on: September 10, 2008, 15:27 »
0
It was Large size. Do not qualify ::) It should, because it's quite easy to take a L and make it XL. And to take a L and print it everywhere you want under 24x36 inches prints.

« Reply #530 on: September 11, 2008, 06:57 »
0
Do you really think that JI agenda is the success of microstocks and contributors...
They just buy ms to rescue their business.

« Reply #531 on: September 11, 2008, 16:36 »
0
bit off topic, but I didn't see any recent threads on this........ but....

I haven't uploaded to StockXpert in some time.... just did so and saw approval within a couple hours!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the immortal words of Darth Vadar, 'Most Impressive"    KUDOS TO StockXpert!!!!!!!!!!!   8)=tom

« Reply #532 on: September 11, 2008, 16:45 »
0
Nice to see they haven't loosened their standards with all that pressure to supply free content to JI and P.C....   3 rejections for property releases... 

« Reply #533 on: September 14, 2008, 21:06 »
0
The concern with subs and Photos.com is no EUL right? 30 cents is it, and this is not fair considering the EULA on SS and other micro agencies, that's the gist of it, am I correct? Out of curiosity, is there a concern of a contributor's subs on SX cannibalizing his pay-per-downloads on the same agency, on SX? In other words, do buyers who have subscriptions buy an image as a pay per download if the image isn't available as a subscription?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
32 Replies
17710 Views
Last post January 20, 2009, 20:33
by maco0708
6 Replies
4326 Views
Last post May 06, 2009, 11:15
by goldenangel
8 Replies
5289 Views
Last post May 24, 2011, 00:11
by cthoman
4 Replies
3094 Views
Last post April 18, 2012, 06:53
by ShadySue
14 Replies
4077 Views
Last post June 15, 2017, 01:26
by DallasP

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle