Is anyone else getting frustrated with the Adobestock rejection rate of Adobe Firefly AI generated images of people?

I find I am getting frustrated with the high rejection rate of Firefly v3 beta "photo" (and earlier versions for that matter) of people.
The images generated are noisy so I usually do simple noise reduction and appropriate sharpening in LR. However, the majority
of images get rejected for the ambiguous and unhelpful reason: "Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards".

Is anyone having a good acceptance rate with Firefly photo images with people?

this is definitely one of the worst aspects of sending AI content,rejections.

it's the worst aspect,especially if you are a contributor who sends few,because you waste time trying to improve the contents and therefore you send a few and then the few you send are also rejected.

In my opinion,the reason for the rejections is more related to the sales potential of the content and whether it is original or not,not much for the quality.

Unfortunately Adobe has to reject a lot,if it doesn't do so the AI ​​content uploaded is too much in a short period of time.

so in my opinion the strategy to adopt with AI is not to waste too much time on it.

I used to waste time on it,but I think now I make a nice selection of AI content selecting all those "can go",since I've generated more than 20,000 of them and I'm starting to send them without any particular tweaks,just upscale.

This way I will send thousands in a short time,and I'm pretty sure that at least 50% will pass the review.

Quote from: wds on May 19, 2024, 08:31

Is anyone else getting frustrated with the Adobestock rejection rate of Adobe Firefly AI generated images of people?
...
I find I am getting frustrated with the high rejection rate of Firefly v3 ...

Frustration intolerance  is a serious issue for immature children, we can understand. But as the years go by, you will become more able to handle it.
Soon, it will no longer be AI images that will be rejected, but AI image contributors... I guess we'll hear more about frustration here...
Fake AI artificial faces with excessive smiles... you really have to want the dream that it sells.

i've had most of my portraits and individuals accepted - images that would otherwise require models which are editorial AS wouldn't accept. you have to learn the failings of generators & work around them (along with post processing - which i do in batches)

Adobestock accepts images createdwith Firefly?

Yes.

I have both AI MJ and AI Firefly in my portfolio,you can also use version 3 of Firefly which is in beta,commercial uses are allowed

I also have people made with Firefly which in my opinion are even better than some of MJ's,the Firefly people seem more natural and real to me.

at the moment I'm working on some AI content, but in reality I don't want to waste too much time on it,I created 20 in a couple of hours,for me it's a record,because before I wasted much more time on it.

in my opinion the strategy to adopt on AI is more on quantity,because you have to consider rejections and then also that it is not easy to sell them,so wasting too much time and producing less,I don't know if it's really a good idea,maybe it can be sometimes,not always.

Quote from: Injustice for all on May 22, 2024, 16:01

Quote from: Stockmaan on May 22, 2024, 14:14

Adobestock accepts images createdwith Firefly?

Yes.

I have both AI MJ and AI Firefly in my portfolio,you can also use version 3 of Firefly which is in beta,commercial uses are allowed

I also have people made with Firefly which in my opinion are even better than some of MJ's,the Firefly people seem more natural and real to me.

at the moment I'm working on some AI content, but in reality I don't want to waste too much time on it,I created 20 in a couple of hours,for me it's a record,because before I wasted much more time on it.

in my opinion the strategy to adopt on AI is more on quantity,because you have to consider rejections and then also that it is not easy to sell them,so wasting too much time and producing less,I don't know if it's really a good idea,maybe it can be sometimes,not always.

Regarding Firefly people. I find that sometimes you get excellent results, many times you don't. Typically, if it's just a "headshot" results can be quite good. If you go for say fully body length not so much. Also, there is quite a large "sample to sample variation" in quality. Maybe when the servers aren't as busy they spend more time per image perhaps?

the general rule,for all AI generators from what I have seen,is that the more distant the subject is,the more generation errors there are,yes generally full body length has more errors and less details even in my experience.

creating AI content that sells is not easy,it really takes original ideas and also luck,the variations are quite evident with better and worse results.

as far as I'm concerned I've generated around 25,000 so far between MJ and Firefly but I have very few for sale on Adobe.

20 AI contents finished in two hours with photo editing,upscale,generative fill and everything you need,ready to be indexed,it's an excellent result in my opinion,going faster is perhaps too much,but slower than this is certainly not good at all because you need quantity to have hopes of sales.

Adobe's AI collection is growing very fast,I think around 5 million every 10 days more or less,before it was a million a week,let alone in 6 months!

At the moment there are 74,513,371

I prefer 100% real content for many reasons,but I am aware that offering AI content is also important,I prefer to focus on real content and from time to time I send maybe 100 AI contents in between.

There are many things to consider if you want to build a portfolio primarily around AI,first of all your content can be copied quite easily,then there is excessive competition,then the technology improves quickly,the AI ​​images of a year ago are now outdated.

I take AI content more as a diversion in my portfolio, if you want to base a business on AI you have to keep up with it and continue to follow,staying focused only on AI,it's a choice.

as far as I'm concerned it seems like I sell real content much easier.

Quote from: Stockmaan on May 22, 2024, 14:14

Adobestock accepts images createdwith Firefly?

Yes.

I have both AI MJ and AI Firefly in my portfolio,you can also use version 3 of Firefly which is in beta,commercial uses are allowed

I also have people made with Firefly which in my opinion are even better than some of MJ's,the Firefly people seem more natural and real to me.

at the moment I'm working on some AI content, but in reality I don't want to waste too much time on it,I created 20 in a couple of hours,for me it's a record,because before I wasted much more time on it.

in my opinion the strategy to adopt on AI is more on quantity,because you have to consider rejections and then also that it is not easy to sell them,so wasting too much time and producing less,I don't know if it's really a good idea,maybe it can be sometimes,not always.

Thank you for answer. And how much do you upsize your images?