MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?  (Read 138552 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #900 on: September 14, 2024, 05:11 »
+1
best week of the year! :)

Congrats!!  I got the best week of the year too!!

Thank you!

Well,this is what I can call a solid income!Congratulations to you!  :)
« Last Edit: September 14, 2024, 05:14 by Injustice for all »


« Reply #901 on: September 14, 2024, 08:11 »
+2
So, you guys are the reason I fell behind position 4000, even though the downloads amount this week is the same as last week when I was at 3700 something  ;D

« Reply #902 on: September 14, 2024, 08:12 »
+2
solid week

pos 3380, 6100 files


« Reply #903 on: September 14, 2024, 11:42 »
+2
best week of the year! :)

Congrats!!  I got the best week of the year too!!

Thank you!

Well,this is what I can call a solid income!Congratulations to you!  :)


Thank you!!

« Reply #904 on: September 18, 2024, 06:43 »
0
You are right, there are not many agencies that produce real revenue (in my order of revenue)

---------------------- 89% of revenue
- AdobeStock
- Shutterstock
- VectEezy (no free submissions)
- IStock/Getty
- MotionElements

What does "no free submissions" mean?
In the threads about the VectEezy agency they write that this stock is very bad. What do you sell on it? Do you get your main income from subscription sales?

« Reply #905 on: September 18, 2024, 09:02 »
+2
What does "no free submissions" mean?
It means I did not submit any of my images for free - you can choose if you upload as commercial or as free images (which earn very little).

« Reply #906 on: September 18, 2024, 17:26 »
0
slightly off topic but just curious... how many downloads do you need to get a lifetime rank?

« Reply #907 on: September 18, 2024, 17:35 »
+2
slightly off topic but just curious... how many downloads do you need to get a lifetime rank?
Unfortunately, I can only help with 2 numbers here (my account and my wife's account), but maybe we can narrow it down:
-> 811 downloads do not give a lifetime rank, shows "---"
-> 10.776 downloads shows the lifetime rank "10.950"
« Last Edit: September 18, 2024, 17:38 by JustAnImage »

« Reply #908 on: September 19, 2024, 01:47 »
+2
Average week so far.

Weekly position at 10,500, pretty ordinary, average... 

« Reply #909 on: September 19, 2024, 03:52 »
+2
pos 3200, 6100 files

it looks nice because of the bonus


« Reply #910 on: September 20, 2024, 09:49 »
+1
I think the weekly ranking is calculated by previous 7 days total number of downloads.  I don't think it's based on the each new calendar week. 

« Reply #911 on: September 20, 2024, 10:13 »
0
slightly off topic but just curious... how many downloads do you need to get a lifetime rank?
Unfortunately, I can only help with 2 numbers here (my account and my wife's account), but maybe we can narrow it down:
-> 811 downloads do not give a lifetime rank, shows "---"
-> 10.776 downloads shows the lifetime rank "10.950"

As you know I had my 44.444 th download in September - lifetime rank 2.880
And you've read about another contributor: 65.200 downloads - lifetime rank 1.820

« Reply #912 on: September 21, 2024, 04:09 »
+1
I think the weekly ranking is calculated by previous 7 days total number of downloads.  I don't think it's based on the each new calendar week.

I noticed that my weekly ranking is updated once a day,when I go down in the ranking,I start selling more and it starts to go up,once I reach a certain point I rebound and start selling little again.

in short,I continue to bounce between 2 values ​​that slowly rise over time.

I think it's like this for everyone.

« Reply #913 on: September 21, 2024, 05:40 »
+1
I think the weekly ranking is calculated by previous 7 days total number of downloads.  I don't think it's based on the each new calendar week.

I noticed that my weekly ranking is updated once a day,when I go down in the ranking,I start selling more and it starts to go up,once I reach a certain point I rebound and start selling little again.

in short,I continue to bounce between 2 values ​​that slowly rise over time.

I think it's like this for everyone.

I had a huge sales day about 9 days ago.  After that day, I was above 1,000, but suddenly yesterday I fell down to 1,200 probably because that huge sales day was out of 7 days week range.  So, definitely the weekly ranking is not about "This week", but 7 days total imo.

« Reply #914 on: September 21, 2024, 07:59 »
0
I think the weekly ranking is calculated by previous 7 days total number of downloads.  I don't think it's based on the each new calendar week.

I noticed that my weekly ranking is updated once a day,when I go down in the ranking,I start selling more and it starts to go up,once I reach a certain point I rebound and start selling little again.

in short,I continue to bounce between 2 values ​​that slowly rise over time.

I think it's like this for everyone.

I had a huge sales day about 9 days ago.  After that day, I was above 1,000, but suddenly yesterday I fell down to 1,200 probably because that huge sales day was out of 7 days week range.  So, definitely the weekly ranking is not about "This week", but 7 days total imo.

yes it is possible,even if it updates daily for me it doesn't mean that it doesn't follow the 7 day pattern.

I think that for me,there are more variations than for you.

it's as if I'm still in the middle of the ocean of contributors and I'm more at the mercy of the waves,but you're now sailing in calmer waters,in fact you're probably already at the port bar drinking a beer if you like!  :D

I think that the higher we are in the ranking the fewer changes there are.

I believe that those who upload regularly have this pattern,bounce between 2 values ​​that increase over time,those who upload less are certainly more stationary or may even drop in the rankings because clearly the portfolio has not improved in this case.

« Reply #915 on: September 21, 2024, 09:56 »
+1
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.


« Reply #916 on: September 21, 2024, 10:37 »
0
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.

Correct!

« Reply #917 on: September 22, 2024, 05:13 »
+2
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.

of course,but why is there anyone who thinks the opposite?  :D

I think we all bounce between 2 values ​​in the rankings.

if your ranking value is an average of 30,000 you can probably bounce between 40,000 and 20,000

if your average value is 20,000 you probably bounce between 15,000 and 25,000

if your average value is 1000 you probably bounce between 800 and 1200

the higher you go,the less variation you have in the rankings,simply because there are fewer contributors at the top.

I don't know whether the ranking follows sales or money,I have some doubts about it,it probably follows both the number of sales and money.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2024, 05:26 by Injustice for all »

« Reply #918 on: September 22, 2024, 06:05 »
+1
anyway apart from all this chatter,my week has been a normal week to be optimistic,last week was better,my average is still increasing,but at the speed of a snail!  :D

« Reply #919 on: September 22, 2024, 06:40 »
0
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.

of course,but why is there anyone who thinks the opposite?  :D

I think we all bounce between 2 values ​​in the rankings.

if your ranking value is an average of 30,000 you can probably bounce between 40,000 and 20,000

if your average value is 20,000 you probably bounce between 15,000 and 25,000

if your average value is 1000 you probably bounce between 800 and 1200

the higher you go,the less variation you have in the rankings,simply because there are fewer contributors at the top.

I don't know whether the ranking follows sales or money,I have some doubts about it,it probably follows both the number of sales and money.
I don't think that there is such a small range.
For a rank below 10.000 there is no large portfolio needed. It is no rocket science to reach a rank around 5000. But it will take some time to built a good performing portfolio for a rank below 3000.
There are three things. Portfolio size, quality and upload volume compared to your competition.
There is no such thing like an Adobe sale system.
 

« Reply #920 on: September 22, 2024, 08:27 »
+1
those are just examples and should not be taken literally,I think everyone can agree on the fact that the higher you are in the ranking,the less changes you undergo in the weekly ranking.

do you want to talk about Adobe's sales system?  :D

I respect your opinion and I also partly agree,in particular I agree that quality and quantity are fundamental to having a greater number of sales.

but I also think that logically there is and must be a system that regulates the distribution of sales,it seems simply logical to me.

Have you ever tried to track the number of weekly sales?

me yes,I've been doing it for years,I write in a book,practically everything,80s style!  :D

in my case,throughout this year,the number of weekly sales has fluctuated between 2 very specific numbers and not very far from each other.

In your opinion,how is it possible that throughout this year I have made the same number of sales for 9 months every week, and how is it possible that hundreds of thousands of contributors sell something every day or almost every day?

do you realize that there are over half a billion content in the Adobe library and that we contributors are hundreds of thousands?

How . do you think we can sell everyone,some more or less certain,but everyone!

even just looking at it from this perspective makes it logical to think that sales are administered by a system.

I recommend you keep track of your weekly sales and write them down on a page,then after at least a year,look at these numbers on this page,and I think you'll be able to notice patterns too.

then for goodness' sake,maybe you're right and I'm wrong,but the evidence of a sales system seems everywhere to me.

and luckily there is,because it seems to me that Adobe's sales system works very well!  :)







« Reply #921 on: September 22, 2024, 22:37 »
+1
those are just examples and should not be taken literally,I think everyone can agree on the fact that the higher you are in the ranking,the less changes you undergo in the weekly ranking.

do you want to talk about Adobe's sales system?  :D

I respect your opinion and I also partly agree,in particular I agree that quality and quantity are fundamental to having a greater number of sales.

but I also think that logically there is and must be a system that regulates the distribution of sales,it seems simply logical to me.

Have you ever tried to track the number of weekly sales?

me yes,I've been doing it for years,I write in a book,practically everything,80s style!  :D

in my case,throughout this year,the number of weekly sales has fluctuated between 2 very specific numbers and not very far from each other.

In your opinion,how is it possible that throughout this year I have made the same number of sales for 9 months every week, and how is it possible that hundreds of thousands of contributors sell something every day or almost every day?

do you realize that there are over half a billion content in the Adobe library and that we contributors are hundreds of thousands?

How . do you think we can sell everyone,some more or less certain,but everyone!

even just looking at it from this perspective makes it logical to think that sales are administered by a system.

I recommend you keep track of your weekly sales and write them down on a page,then after at least a year,look at these numbers on this page,and I think you'll be able to notice patterns too.

then for goodness' sake,maybe you're right and I'm wrong,but the evidence of a sales system seems everywhere to me.

and luckily there is,because it seems to me that Adobe's sales system works very well!  :)

No need to write them down, you can just get adobe to plot them out. Mine certainly are not very close to 2 different values.

« Reply #922 on: September 23, 2024, 04:29 »
+3
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.

of course,but why is there anyone who thinks the opposite?  :D

I think we all bounce between 2 values ​​in the rankings.

if your ranking value is an average of 30,000 you can probably bounce between 40,000 and 20,000

if your average value is 20,000 you probably bounce between 15,000 and 25,000

if your average value is 1000 you probably bounce between 800 and 1200

the higher you go,the less variation you have in the rankings,simply because there are fewer contributors at the top.

I don't know whether the ranking follows sales or money,I have some doubts about it,it probably follows both the number of sales and money.

Weekly rankings will vary based on what seasonal content you have. Like the movement of the tide and over time, you see the patterns in the data.

Lifetime rank for a change.

« Reply #923 on: September 23, 2024, 04:35 »
+1
I'm surprised this seems rather confusing for a lot of people? I believe I even read where it stated what the weekly sales rank is?

It's simply your rank, in terms of downloads - relatively to ALL the other contributors - for that week. Lifetime rank is simply for all contributors over the LIFETIME.

So, if you get more downloads than more people - your rank goes up. If other people get more downloads than you, your rank goes down.
So you 'could' be ranked #1, if for example you had '3' downloads, and 'everyone else' had 1. Or, you could be ranked #10000 if you had say 1000 downloads, but 'everyone else' had 1001+...

Really quite simple. Your weekly ranking is just simply how many downloads you've had relative to everyone else in the system.

of course,but why is there anyone who thinks the opposite?  :D

I think we all bounce between 2 values ​​in the rankings.

if your ranking value is an average of 30,000 you can probably bounce between 40,000 and 20,000

if your average value is 20,000 you probably bounce between 15,000 and 25,000

if your average value is 1000 you probably bounce between 800 and 1200

the higher you go,the less variation you have in the rankings,simply because there are fewer contributors at the top.

I don't know whether the ranking follows sales or money,I have some doubts about it,it probably follows both the number of sales and money.

Weekly rankings will vary based on what seasonal content you have. Like the movement of the tide and over time, you see the patterns in the data.

Lifetime rank for a change.


Great numbers!Congrats!

When did you start? And how many files do you have?
Sorry, maybe you've already written that and I've forgotten.

« Reply #924 on: September 23, 2024, 05:10 »
+2
@HalfFull

For having these results I'm sure you've done an exceptional job!

But I'm also pretty sure you've been contributing for at least 10 years,but probably more time.

Well done!  :)



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
40 Replies
18457 Views
Last post October 21, 2015, 03:35
by pkphotos
2 Replies
3119 Views
Last post February 03, 2016, 11:39
by littleny
43 Replies
14207 Views
Last post March 02, 2017, 18:16
by noodle
6 Replies
4545 Views
Last post November 29, 2020, 09:46
by Pauws99
20 Replies
8380 Views
Last post December 31, 2020, 13:33
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors