MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: how is it possible? Borrowed elements used in stock photos.  (Read 34728 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OM

« Reply #100 on: January 12, 2013, 19:59 »
+1
Should be calling himself Max Kleptographer and has added to his port recently too.

Hope Max Profit doesn't prevail over Max Theft Photo. I would be sorely disappointed in SS were that to be the case.


« Reply #101 on: January 12, 2013, 21:32 »
0
Should be calling himself Max Kleptographer and has added to his port recently too.

Hope Max Profit doesn't prevail over Max Theft Photo. I would be sorely disappointed in SS were that to be the case.

don't think that will happen unless we are talking about a cousin of a person working for SS ;D

« Reply #102 on: January 13, 2013, 06:13 »
0
Now that other contributors on SS are pointing out usage of their work without permission they'll have to do something about it otherwise it'll allow free reign of image theft on the site.

Of course they'd like to keep him around from a financial standpoint but from a legal standpoint, if they are aware that a member is infringing on others' work, they'd have to distance themselves (kill his port) or worry about being held liable for aiding in the sale of copyrighted (without license/consent) work.

@luissantos84, I spent 15-20 minutes digging to find other uses but came up with nothing. Awesome image hunting on your behalf.

« Reply #103 on: January 13, 2013, 07:45 »
+1
Can I play?  ( he even badly repeated the background in the middle )





« Last Edit: January 13, 2013, 07:49 by sjlocke »

« Reply #104 on: January 13, 2013, 07:48 »
+1



« Reply #105 on: January 13, 2013, 07:54 »
+1



« Reply #106 on: January 13, 2013, 09:49 »
0
thanks for adding a few more Sean!

I really don't believe that FT and 123RF have given his account back after suspending him, who is this guy???

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #107 on: January 13, 2013, 10:00 »
0
There is now a thread on SS about it!

And a few are claiming he is using their work so lets see what comes of this.

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=127563


man I hope SS does the right thing this time because he was suspended, now back...


Interested to see how SS answer this, especially as that thread makes it clear there was no 'agreement' reached with the original photographers.

« Reply #108 on: January 13, 2013, 10:05 »
0
There is now a thread on SS about it!

And a few are claiming he is using their work so lets see what comes of this.

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=127563


man I hope SS does the right thing this time because he was suspended, now back...


Interested to see how SS answer this, especially as that thread makes it clear there was no 'agreement' reached with the original photographers.


indeed, topic at SS shows two owners saying he has no authorization, this max is now copying files from over 5 photographers, most of them very good contributors which makes it even easier to find his work

« Reply #109 on: January 13, 2013, 10:23 »
0




there is change in the sky which is used all over his portfolio...

« Reply #110 on: January 13, 2013, 10:41 »
0
Do you think he needs to buy the original files to edit the backgrounds, or  just use small blurred files preview downloaded on the sites?

« Reply #111 on: January 13, 2013, 10:47 »
0
Do you think he needs to buy the original files to edit the backgrounds, or  just use small blurred files preview downloaded on the sites?

that's interesting, not sure how relevant unless agencies track this guy purchases, I believe he actually buys them or perhaps takes the watermark, sure its a friend of him that buys the files not him ;D

« Reply #112 on: January 13, 2013, 10:59 »
0




blurred 3d

« Reply #113 on: January 13, 2013, 11:15 »
0
Excellent sleuthing Luis & Sean. It's utterly bizarre how this issue has developed. Good work starting a thread on SS too.

« Reply #114 on: January 13, 2013, 11:15 »
0




perhaps not the perfect guys to mess around ;D

http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-137002p1.html

« Reply #115 on: January 13, 2013, 11:26 »
0
OMFG. That guy became rich thanks to image of planks. I have one too but it doesn't work that well.

rubyroo

« Reply #116 on: January 13, 2013, 11:33 »
0
Yep, I'm about to shoot every plank in existence.  ;)

I'm as amazed as others that this stuff is still available.  I admire your tenacity Luis.



« Reply #117 on: January 13, 2013, 11:34 »
0



« Reply #118 on: January 13, 2013, 11:35 »
+1
Yep, I'm about to shoot every plank in existence.  ;)

I'm as amazed as others that this stuff is still available.  I admire your tenacity Luis.

I still have time before going out to watch life of pi ;D

rubyroo

« Reply #119 on: January 13, 2013, 11:46 »
0
LOL  Enjoy the film, and the break!   ;D

ruxpriencdiam

    This user is banned.
  • Location. Third stone from the sun
« Reply #120 on: January 13, 2013, 14:21 »
+2
I have linked the thread in SS to the "Anything Goes" forum to see if it can get some more attention and perhaps SS may step in if enough people get on board.

Microbius

« Reply #121 on: January 13, 2013, 15:04 »
+5
Is this another studio where they will claim to have sacked the one rotten apple and get reinstated, then do it again, and repeat. I am getting really disheartened by the stuff going on at the moment. Are we submitting to warez sites now. They accept stolen work then give it away for free?

« Reply #122 on: January 13, 2013, 16:35 »
0
Maksymilian Skolik - LMS STUDIO, Częstochowa, Poland

Looks like he owns a studio of some sort....

All very intriguing..

« Reply #123 on: January 13, 2013, 16:55 »
0
Maksymilian Skolik - LMS STUDIO, Częstochowa, Poland

Looks like he owns a studio of some sort....

All very intriguing..

he can have all the studios he wishes, there are already 2 photographers saying he had no authorization, if SS doesn't do anything regarding this matter I will make sure to tell all other ;D

« Reply #124 on: January 13, 2013, 17:27 »
0
So far people have referred to these as 'composite' works but perhaps they should be referred to as  'derivative' works. That makes a difference legally.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
5771 Views
Last post September 18, 2006, 21:23
by maunger
39 Replies
17427 Views
Last post August 12, 2010, 03:13
by mtkang
9 Replies
5395 Views
Last post December 07, 2011, 04:53
by ruigsantos
6 Replies
6653 Views
Last post July 19, 2012, 03:13
by ShadySue
33 Replies
13067 Views
Last post August 28, 2012, 18:16
by rimglow

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors