MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Reality? Whats That?  (Read 2324 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: October 23, 2008, 02:40 »
0
There's a discussion on istock at the moment about 3D renders, in which the chief 3D admin, Mark Evans, has said that they intend to segregate 3D renders out into a separate section (or at least be tagged as 3D renders). One or two people in that discussion consider it important to know if an image is 'real' or fake.

I'm in a subversive mood at the moment. My port on istock is small, but henceforth I intend to follow this process with my photos:
set up a plane in Blender orthogonal to the camera, with the same resolution as the photo
map the image to the plane as a texture
use the compositing nodes (equivalent to adjustment layer on PS) for PP
render
upload as a 3D render (which it will be).

As if photography is reality...


« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2008, 03:37 »
0
like the argument about digital photography is too much photoshop

aside from some pj's when has commercial photography ever been about reality??? pic of abraham lincolns head on another body, hours in darkroom, even soft focus lenses etc etc. not to many black & white or sepia landscapes around :) (not to mention cross processing :)   


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
39 Replies
11980 Views
Last post May 27, 2009, 01:11
by MichaelJay
8 Replies
3011 Views
Last post March 11, 2015, 15:06
by StockPhotosArt.com
2 Replies
3565 Views
Last post July 06, 2015, 21:25
by grace
6 Replies
4956 Views
Last post March 12, 2017, 02:36
by unnonimus
6 Replies
2268 Views
Last post March 10, 2018, 09:42
by angelawaye

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors