Author Topic: Shutterstat - TOP Images and Authors from Shutterstock (Read 16785 times)

Statsman · « **on:** May 16, 2016, 07:28 »

Hi, everyone. I'd like to present to you new service which can help you analyze modern trends from Shutterstock.

Shutterstat.pro [nofollow]
You can:
1) track image position in TOP in different categories
2) view TOP authors and rank them by quantity of images, % of sales etc.
Short description in INFO page

If you have some suggestion, text me without hesitations

noodle · « **Reply #1 on:** May 16, 2016, 08:04 »

Thats very cool!

Thanks for that!

alno · « **Reply #2 on:** May 16, 2016, 08:19 »

Quote from: Yakobchuk on May 16, 2016, 07:28

Hi, everyone. I'd like to present to you new service which can help you analyze modern trends from Shutterstock.

Shutterstat.pro
You can:
1) track image position in TOP in different categories
2) view TOP authors and rank them by quantity of images, % of sales etc.
Short description in INFO page

If you have some suggestion, text me without hesitations

Nice service!
I guess video section is still in progress?

Statsman · « **Reply #3 on:** May 16, 2016, 08:43 »

Quote from: Irina Anosova on May 16, 2016, 08:19

Nice service!
I guess video section is still in progress?

Thanks!

Yes, I was asked to do the same for video recently so I'm in progress. I hope you'll have the opportunity to inspect this page

Thomas from France · « **Reply #4 on:** May 16, 2016, 09:27 »

Excellent work ! Does SS know about this ?

Zero Talent · « **Reply #5 on:** May 16, 2016, 09:48 »

Nice!
I found myself among those with photos in Top 100. I can tell that photos in Top 100 must sell at least once every day.
Great way to see where we stand!

Minsc · « **Reply #6 on:** May 16, 2016, 11:07 »

Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

Zero Talent · « **Reply #7 on:** May 16, 2016, 11:34 »

Quote from: Minsc on May 16, 2016, 11:07

Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

fotoVoyager · « **Reply #8 on:** May 16, 2016, 11:59 »

That's very interesting, thanks!

Statsman · « **Reply #9 on:** May 16, 2016, 12:01 »

Quote from: Minsc on May 16, 2016, 11:07

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I think it's not available. This statistics represents opened information, which you can find by yourself but is would be much-much longer than use shutterstat:)

Statsman · « **Reply #10 on:** May 16, 2016, 12:02 »

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 11:34

I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

That's right!

Cider Apple · « **Reply #11 on:** May 16, 2016, 12:14 »

Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!

Minsc · « **Reply #12 on:** May 16, 2016, 12:38 »

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 11:34

Quote from: Minsc on May 16, 2016, 11:07
Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

Thanks. I figured as much. That information is too private.

Statsman · « **Reply #13 on:** May 16, 2016, 12:42 »

Quote from: Cider Apple on May 16, 2016, 12:14

Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!

It's in progress! Maybe you have some suggestions? feel free

Zero Talent · « **Reply #14 on:** May 16, 2016, 13:19 »

Quote from: Yakobchuk on May 16, 2016, 12:42

Quote from: Cider Apple on May 16, 2016, 12:14
Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!
It's in progress! Maybe you have some suggestions? feel free

Maybe you can also offer a similar list based on the "Relevant" Top100, instead of "Popular" only

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.

Statsman · « **Reply #15 on:** May 16, 2016, 13:33 »

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 13:19

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.

I've been collecting all information since 24 of March 2016. All images which were in TOP on SS before aren't in the statistics. That's why you can't find them.

Zero Talent · « **Reply #16 on:** May 16, 2016, 13:49 »

Quote from: Yakobchuk on May 16, 2016, 13:33

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 13:19

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.

I've been collecting all information since 24 of March 2016. All images which were in TOP on SS before aren't in the statistics. That's why you can't find them.

Are you collecting top 100 from the "popular" tab, from the "relevant" tab, or from both?
If from both, how do you combine the two queries in one Top 100 list for each category?

Statsman · « **Reply #17 on:** May 16, 2016, 14:16 »

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 13:49

Are you collecting top 100 from the "popular" tab, from the "relevant" tab, or from both?
If from both, how do you combine the two queries in one Top 100 list for each category?

Only from "Popular".

Zero Talent · « **Reply #18 on:** May 16, 2016, 14:23 »

Quote from: Yakobchuk on May 16, 2016, 14:16

Only from "Popular".

That's what I thought.
Hence the suggestion to collect the same info from the "relevant tab". If you query the "relevant" tab,
we will certainly see some veterans, even if they are not present among the most "popular" authors.

Money is not only made by being a "popular" author, but also by being a "relevant" author.

Statsman · « **Reply #19 on:** May 16, 2016, 14:40 »

Quote from: Zero Talent on May 16, 2016, 14:23

Quote from: Yakobchuk on May 16, 2016, 14:16
Only from "Popular".

That's what I thought.
Hence the suggestion to collect the same info from the "relevant tab". If you query the "relevant" tab,
we will certainly see some veterans, even if they are not present among the most "popular" authors.

Money is not only made by being a "popular" author, but also by being a "relevant" author.

Thanks a lot! I'll think how to mix them, because now it seems to me a little bit difficult

seanh · « **Reply #20 on:** May 17, 2016, 08:25 »

Nice Job, works good and very useful

sauletas · « **Reply #21 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:31 »

Thank You! Very useful site!

substancep · « **Reply #22 on:** May 17, 2016, 10:00 »

Great job! Another great tool to (hopefully) find ways to increase sales!

zorba · « **Reply #23 on:** May 17, 2016, 15:25 »

good job!

chris-herzog · « **Reply #24 on:** May 17, 2016, 16:31 »

Thanks, very well done!

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Shutterstat - TOP Images and Authors from Shutterstock (Read 16785 times)

Statsman

noodle

alno

Statsman

Thomas from France

Zero Talent

Minsc

Zero Talent

fotoVoyager

Statsman

Statsman

Cider Apple

Minsc

Statsman

Zero Talent

Statsman

Zero Talent

Statsman

Zero Talent

Statsman

seanh

sauletas

substancep

zorba

chris-herzog

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors