MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: What would you do with a potential super sales photo??  (Read 12429 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: December 05, 2010, 18:35 »
0
It's a wonderful work of art.  Hope you make thousands ; )


ShadySue

« Reply #26 on: December 05, 2010, 18:58 »
0
Love it and good luck with it. Well done!

Noodles

« Reply #27 on: December 05, 2010, 19:39 »
0
Good work - I'd make sure its supplied with a Clipping Path and then the designer can decide on a background that suits their project - can see this as a blueflame + on IS :)

lagereek

« Reply #28 on: December 06, 2010, 02:17 »
0
great conceptual shot but, yes! you wanna put some more blue sky around the globe.

best of luck with it.

rubyroo

« Reply #29 on: December 06, 2010, 02:30 »
0
I agree.  Wonderful image!  Congrats.

RacePhoto

« Reply #30 on: December 06, 2010, 23:55 »
0
Contact Getty with a link to the image, if it really is as good as you say they'll take the image no matter whether you're a contributor already or not, if you don't hear back from them you have your answer as to it's 'super' sales potential.

Contact Getty - HOW??? Something that seems to have eluded me for a couple of years, as they don't answer the question themselves?

arquiplay77

Nice image execution and concept.

Why would you want a different Pseudo on Alamy for one image? I don't understand the reasoning?

Once it's unleashed RF it's done, no going back. You have to decide if you think one buyer will pay enough for an exclusive, maybe for a couple of years, to compensate you for a few years of small sales on micro.

« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2010, 06:22 »
0
Why would you want a different Pseudo on Alamy for one image? I don't understand the reasoning?
I ment having a different alias to manage a RM portafolio along with the RF one.
It's just that i dont have any experience in the RM or macro field, and i was thinking in starting with some images.
Anyway for now ill continue with the micros, Maybe when i become more productive in therms oc quantity i think about it again.

Cheers

fxegs

  • FXEGS http://fxegs.photoshelter.com

« Reply #32 on: December 07, 2010, 08:38 »
0
Great picture!

If you search for 'globe buildings' at IS and others you could find similar conceptual works, so I think you should have no problem submitting it. And I think yours is more appealing.

I have the same questions than you about Alamy and starting with RM, so thanks all of you writers, your arguments and suggestions are very useful to newbies like me.

« Reply #33 on: December 07, 2010, 08:47 »
0
Hi arquiplay77,

That's a fine piece of work, my compliments! I would definitely not call it arrogance to try to get the most out of your work.

I had the same kind of dilemma about a year ago after I finished an artwork very similar to yours - a conceptual mini-world. I decided to avoid microstock and uploaded it on Flickr, then put it on prints and postcards on Zazzle, where it brought about $150 so far, not more.

The funny thing is that I intended to upload it as RM on Alamy but never did that due to.. chronic procrastination.  
About a couple of months ago I was contacted through Flickr by a company (toys & games) and after some negotiation, we ended up with an agreement worth several thousand euros and other 5 similar works to be created. The only difficult thing now is to write the RM license contract by myself.

I just wanted to share my story with you since I understand perfectly how you must feel. I personally decided that not selling this particular artwork at all would make me feel much better than selling it as RF and cringe every time I get a max size, sub download. But that's just me.

I wish you good luck, lots of sales and hope you took the right decision! :)
 

« Reply #34 on: December 08, 2010, 04:46 »
0
Thanks Magda, interesting story.
I allready send the image to micros so lets see...
Cheers

RacePhoto

« Reply #35 on: December 09, 2010, 17:29 »
0
Why would you want a different Pseudo on Alamy for one image? I don't understand the reasoning?
I ment having a different alias to manage a RM portafolio along with the RF one.
It's just that i dont have any experience in the RM or macro field, and i was thinking in starting with some images.
Anyway for now ill continue with the micros, Maybe when i become more productive in therms oc quantity i think about it again.

Cheers

Ah, I did that too. RF under one name, RM/Editorial under another and RM because I thought it worked that way, as another. :D By the way, it's with middle initial, and without and one letter off my first name on the other, so identity is not an issue. I feel that the photographer should have an identity not a cute anonymous Micro name. (yes I have one of those too)

I've actually thought of making everything RM except anything that has already sold RF. The one reason I like RM better is, they state what use, even if they don't have the specific publication. Better than getting some change and never knowing anything about the buyer at all.

« Reply #36 on: December 12, 2010, 17:43 »
0
congratulations for the Editor's Choice :)

« Reply #37 on: December 13, 2010, 03:56 »
0
congratulations for the Editor's Choice :)

Wow! i hadn't relized of it, thank you for the info.
It sure makes a difference, the image is on air on DT since 10th and had no views until yestarday (i guess when the editor's choice) then 4 dl in a row, hope from now on it continues the trend.
Cheers

« Reply #38 on: December 14, 2010, 13:25 »
0
Congratulations! Well deserved!

RacePhoto

« Reply #39 on: December 14, 2010, 14:32 »
0
congratulations for the Editor's Choice :)

Wow! i hadn't relized of it, thank you for the info.
It sure makes a difference, the image is on air on DT since 10th and had no views until yestarday (i guess when the editor's choice) then 4 dl in a row, hope from now on it continues the trend.
Cheers

Which begs the question, I've always asked. Since I don't do fine creative shots like this or the ones people do with models. I have to ask you.

Can you com eback in a year and see if all the micro sales of one fantastic shot, equal one RM sale on Alamy for example? I keep wondering if all those volume sales, the old way of micro making it pay, will still add up to one big sale, now that there are 10-15 million competing images, instead of 2-4 million images?

Has the whole game changed and people need to look at which methods bring the real returns, in an evolving marketplace?

« Reply #40 on: December 15, 2010, 04:54 »
0
Which begs the question, I've always asked. Since I don't do fine creative shots like this or the ones people do with models. I have to ask you.

Can you com eback in a year and see if all the micro sales of one fantastic shot, equal one RM sale on Alamy for example? I keep wondering if all those volume sales, the old way of micro making it pay, will still add up to one big sale, now that there are 10-15 million competing images, instead of 2-4 million images?

Has the whole game changed and people need to look at which methods bring the real returns, in an evolving marketplace?

So, how much is one big RM sale?

grp_photo

« Reply #41 on: December 15, 2010, 05:17 »
0
I had one which was netting me (my cut) 1200,- Euros and one with 1700,- Euros (selling price was with both about 5000,- Dollars but at the second sale I did get more percentages from this agency) both sales happened in the last three months.
But there are still high RM-Sales with 5 digits -figures unfortunately I never had one of these :-(
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 05:19 by grp_photo »


« Reply #42 on: December 15, 2010, 06:31 »
0
You must feel very good when see such a commission in one single sale  ;D
Anyway as its impossible to know what files are going to sell, the key is to think in terms of the entire port, if i have X amount of images in a RM port, and those makes me Y money at month, would these same X images make me more or less money than Y on micros.
In micros almost avery single image is contributing to the total amount, and maybe as RM only one seles each month.
The answer will allways be an estimation as its impossible to have the same images on both, and beeing myself totallly unexperienced in RM field, i cant answer that.

grp_photo

« Reply #43 on: December 15, 2010, 07:01 »
0
Yes was good ;D
You also have RM-Sales like 7 Euro or so. A photo does earn more if you have it on Getty or Corbis than in Microstock (in general) it's just hard to get anything in it. You need common sense and some market knowledge if it is better to place RM or Micro or RF which Agencies etc.
You will have a hard time to earn 1700,- Euros with a photo placed today in Micro. Many people see the blue flames at iStock but they forgot that these pictures are mostly pretty old (old in Microstock-terms anything older than two years is very old). The market did change already a picture placed today has it much much more difficult to reach blue flames than two years ago, it's changing pretty fast.

RacePhoto

« Reply #44 on: December 16, 2010, 13:57 »
0
You must feel very good when see such a commission in one single sale  ;D
Anyway as its impossible to know what files are going to sell, the key is to think in terms of the entire port, if i have X amount of images in a RM port, and those makes me Y money at month, would these same X images make me more or less money than Y on micros.
In micros almost avery single image is contributing to the total amount, and maybe as RM only one seles each month.
The answer will allways be an estimation as its impossible to have the same images on both, and beeing myself totallly unexperienced in RM field, i cant answer that.

I think the image will do well in micro or anyplace else. That's not the question. Come back in a year and report a total sales number (if you don't mind someone asking and prying into private information about one image) and see how much a great one brought in, in a year. I think this would be the best example or a super sales photo, just as you asked in the start.

Same as someone can say it might bring a couple thousand with one RM protected sale, not now, the whole premise of micro RF is that one image sells many times and the volume makes up for the lower prices. Nice test case.

« Reply #45 on: December 16, 2010, 16:37 »
0
Ill be happy to share the numbers in a year, the problem is that i remember to do it, you are wellcome to PM me to let me know if i dont  ::).

Anyway the image is selling but not as much i espected to, in FT for example was like a hole week with no even a single view. In IS as a espected was rejected, but i have to agree the reason, there was some minor tonal banding in the BKG gradient (at least i think that is the exact problem) so i uploaded it again. I really hope it starts on the right foot there.

Cheers


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
2361 Views
Last post November 25, 2007, 20:27
by ale1969
1 Replies
1768 Views
Last post May 30, 2008, 12:29
by lisafx
13 Replies
3659 Views
Last post May 16, 2009, 05:58
by allyclark
1 Replies
1438 Views
Last post January 25, 2014, 19:47
by ruxpriencdiam
54 Replies
19393 Views
Last post March 21, 2015, 10:36
by Jojo - Super Image Market

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results