Author Topic: Where is my Canon 44.7 MP dSLR Camera (Read 13992 times)

Goofy · « **on:** January 14, 2014, 14:25 »

Okay, where the heck is the Canon dSLR that was to be released 08/2013 that was going to give the Nikon D800e a run for its money? At one time it was going to be named '1D S' but now seems to have been dropped of the face of the earth...

Photobomb · « **Reply #1 on:** January 14, 2014, 14:42 »

overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth.

Goofy · « **Reply #2 on:** January 14, 2014, 15:14 »

"
overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth."

Let's do the math on payoff of the new Zeiss Lens:

26,316 Subs on Shutter for break even point!

Beppe Grillo · « **Reply #3 on:** January 15, 2014, 04:31 »

44.7 MP is not enough for web…
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/

Copidosoma · « **Reply #4 on:** January 15, 2014, 10:19 »

Quote from: PhotoBomb on January 14, 2014, 14:42

overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth.

And with Canon's current pricing scheme, the body will cost $10000 too.

Ron · « **Reply #5 on:** January 15, 2014, 12:53 »

Unless the next camera is 576 megapixels I wont upgrade. For me anything less then the resolution of the human eye is not going to cut it.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

And yes, someone already created a gigapixel image, lol

http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm

Batman · « **Reply #6 on:** January 15, 2014, 18:14 »

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 15, 2014, 04:31

44.7 MP is not enough for web…
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/

$33,000 sounds good.

Mantis · « **Reply #7 on:** January 15, 2014, 21:31 »

Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Goofy · « **Reply #8 on:** January 15, 2014, 22:55 »

This was my payment of the fancy new camera!

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/15/world/americas/panama-airport-suitcases-cash/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #9 on:** January 16, 2014, 18:17 »

Quote from: Batman on January 15, 2014, 18:14

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 15, 2014, 04:31
44.7 MP is not enough for web…
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/

$33,000 sounds good.

I suppose it's easier than using a sheet of Velvia, but it's a heck of a lot more expensive.

gostwyck · « **Reply #10 on:** January 16, 2014, 18:36 »

Quote from: Mantis on January 15, 2014, 21:31

Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Someone talking some sense at last! Extended dynamic range is the advancement that will most likely get me spending my money to upgrade.

bunhill · « **Reply #11 on:** January 16, 2014, 19:50 »

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 15, 2014, 04:31

44.7 MP is not enough for web…
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/

One thing against digital backs is their poor low light performance vs modern CMOS sensors.

nicku · « **Reply #12 on:** January 17, 2014, 02:02 »

Quote from: Ron on January 15, 2014, 12:53

Unless the next camera is 576 megapixels I wont upgrade. For me anything less then the resolution of the human eye is not going to cut it.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

And yes, someone already created a gigapixel image, lol

http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm

Interesting article Ron....

Beppe Grillo · « **Reply #13 on:** January 17, 2014, 02:02 »

Quote from: Mantis on January 15, 2014, 21:31

Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Exact.
When you see the difference of quality that you have comparing full frame sensors with medium format ones you understand that there is a huge hole to fill in the middle.

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #14 on:** January 19, 2014, 14:38 »

Quote from: gostwyck on January 16, 2014, 18:36

Quote from: Mantis on January 15, 2014, 21:31
Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Someone talking some sense at last! Extended dynamic range is the advancement that will most likely get me spending my money to upgrade.

The 6D is quite phenomenal for its low-light performance.

JPSDK · « **Reply #15 on:** January 19, 2014, 16:34 »

FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

Beppe Grillo · « **Reply #16 on:** January 20, 2014, 04:11 »

Quote from: JPSDK on January 19, 2014, 16:34

FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #17 on:** January 20, 2014, 04:45 »

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 20, 2014, 04:11

Quote from: JPSDK on January 19, 2014, 16:34
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)

However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.

Beppe Grillo · « **Reply #18 on:** January 20, 2014, 05:13 »

Quote from: BaldricksTrousers on January 20, 2014, 04:45

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 20, 2014, 04:11
Quote from: JPSDK on January 19, 2014, 16:34
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)

However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.

Most of the tests that have seen about high ISO noise give Nikon winner over Canon.
Then in the real use I don't know.

http://www.dxomark.com/en/Cameras/Ratings/List-view

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings/List-view/Sports
Here the first Canon is in 8th position.

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #19 on:** January 20, 2014, 08:45 »

Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 20, 2014, 05:13

Quote from: BaldricksTrousers on January 20, 2014, 04:45
Quote from: Beppe Grillo on January 20, 2014, 04:11
Quote from: JPSDK on January 19, 2014, 16:34
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)

However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.

Most of the tests that have seen about high ISO noise give Nikon winner over Canon.
Then in the real use I don't know.

http://www.dxomark.com/en/Cameras/Ratings/List-view

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings/List-view/Sports
Here the first Canon is in 8th position.

I must say, those results come as a real surprise to me. But then I've only got older Canon models to compare the 6D with (the 5D MkII being my previous camera). Maybe the Nikon guys really have been having a ball while we've Canonistas trailed along behind them.

ijansempoi · « **Reply #20 on:** August 11, 2014, 09:44 »

I seriously do not think it will be out soon

Goofy · « **Reply #21 on:** August 11, 2014, 13:12 »

Quote from: ijansempoi on August 11, 2014, 09:44

I seriously do not think it will be out soon

show me the updated link

MxR · « **Reply #22 on:** August 11, 2014, 14:10 »

where is my sony a7s with 12 mp...!!

PeterChigmaroff · « **Reply #23 on:** August 11, 2014, 14:29 »

I'm thinking of regressing to a micro 4/3 like the GX7 or thereabouts. I really hate big cameras now.

Goofy · « **Reply #24 on:** August 11, 2014, 14:59 »

I am thinking about leaving the Canon family for the D810 Nikon myself...

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Where is my Canon 44.7 MP dSLR Camera (Read 13992 times)

Goofy

Photobomb

Goofy

Beppe Grillo

Copidosoma

Ron

Batman

Mantis

Goofy

BaldricksTrousers

gostwyck

bunhill

nicku

Beppe Grillo

BaldricksTrousers

JPSDK

Beppe Grillo

BaldricksTrousers

Beppe Grillo

BaldricksTrousers

ijansempoi

Goofy

MxR

PeterChigmaroff

Goofy

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors