MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Yakystockero
1
« on: April 06, 2025, 15:34 »
I'm going to be laughing at this joke all week: China is bankrupt, haha. My friend, this is the perfect excuse they've been waiting for in China. China has already surpassed the US in GDP by purchasing power parity; it's the world's largest economy, and it's done so without having to fire missiles or invade any country.
It's easy to be impressed by China's growth, but as historian Frank Diktter explains, much of what we see is state-driven projection. The CCP is incredibly powerful but also paranoidobsessed with control and terrified of internal instability. Economic success has come with massive overproduction, unreliable data, and deep rural inequality. So yes, China looks strong, but beneath the surface, its fragilemore like a tanker with sailors desperately plugging holes than an unstoppable superpowerjust something to think about.
I invite anyone interested in this perspective to watch the following insightful video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goEU7C1xmis&t=1305s
From a historical perspective, China has been the true global powerhouse for millennia. The United States had its moment, taking advantage of the reindustrialization process following World War II and the vast pool of intelligent, eager-to-work human capital that emigrated to the United States. In my city in Spain, for years now, it's become more common to see American families come to settle here, seeking security for their families and high-quality, universal healthcare systems. What once made the United States greatimmigrationby rejecting it will make it small again. GDP as % of Global GDP (Historical Estimates) Year China India USA UK France Historical Context 1 AD 26.2% 32.9% China and India dominate with advanced agricultural economies 1000 22.7% 28.9% Still the two global economic superpowers 1500 25.0% 24.5% 1.0% 3.0% Europe is growing but still secondary 1700 22.3% 24.4% 0.1% 2.9% 4.4% China and India still dominant, Europe rising 1820 32.9% 16.0% 1.8% 5.2% 5.0% China is the worlds largest economy before decline 1870 17.3% 12.2% 8.9% 9.1% 9.0% Industrial Revolution: Europe and the U.S. overtake Asia 1900 8.6% 5.4% 13.8% 9.3% 5.6% The U.S. begins to lead; China in decline 1950 4.5% 4.2% 27.3% 6.5% 5.3% Post-WWII: The U.S. dominates the global economy 1978 4.9% 3.1% 25.0% 4.2% 4.0% China at its economic low point before reforms 2000 7.4% 4.0% 24.5% 3.5% 3.1% China and India begin to rise again 2010 13.6% 5.5% 22.3% 2.5% 2.3% Chinas growth accelerates dramatically 2020 17.4% 7.0% 24.7% 2.2% 2.0% China consolidates its position as second-largest economy 2023 18.9% 7.3% 15.4% 2.2% 1.8% In Purchasing Power Parity, China surpasses the U.S. 🗝️ Key Notes: PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) offers a more accurate picture of real economic size. The U.S. has dominated global output from ~1870 to the present in nominal terms. China has regained global leadership in PPP terms in the 21st century. India is also re-emerging as a major global player. Western Europe peaked in influence between the 18th and 20th centuries but has since declined relatively.
2
« on: April 06, 2025, 03:58 »
Yes, China will now receive less profit, and perhaps even go bankrupt economically.
I'm going to be laughing at this joke all week: China is bankrupt, haha. My friend, this is the perfect excuse they've been waiting for in China. China has already surpassed the US in GDP by purchasing power parity; it's the world's largest economy, and it's done so without having to fire missiles or invade any country.
3
« on: March 24, 2024, 19:21 »
What is the point of having to choose categories, if the search is done by keywords? Better to keep things simple, fewer requests to the server equals faster response.
4
« on: March 08, 2024, 13:59 »
Even automated online payments are not free. You need software, a payment service provider or payment gateway. This costs money and the prices usually depend on the invoice volume.
In this respect, Dreamstime's argument is understandable.
I prefer the high payout limit to lower sales revenue 
Payment companies offer these transfers, services and free software to many sender, as they take a good cut in the currency exchange, with the loss of the recipient of course.
5
« on: March 08, 2024, 04:52 »
Well, $100 made sense years ago when DT worked well and could be reached in a few weeks/months, but this situation has changed. While it is true that they are within their rights since it is known and agreed information, it would be good if they knew how to adapt to their new situation and lower that limit, especially given that payment is an automatic and cost-free process.
And if they are not able to automate, it is because they are outdated and out of the market, and therefore they will die little by little, ergo it would make no sense to continue uploading content there.
6
« on: March 05, 2024, 04:10 »
I also have 1 "sent 1 year ago", in a queue with 4k sent 1 month ago.
7
« on: February 29, 2024, 13:38 »
Is it worth uploading AI to vecteezy?
8
« on: February 26, 2024, 08:59 »
Lifetime: 4200 This week (Monday noon) : 25 dl 1850
9
« on: February 25, 2024, 18:51 »
"Dreamstime makes it extremely easy to upload." extremely??
For me it is one of the most tedious to upload, so much so that I hardly upload anything there anymore. 2023 stopped selling me almost nothing, and in 2024 nothing. Port of almost 30k images.
10
« on: February 22, 2024, 10:11 »
11
« on: February 20, 2024, 08:41 »
yeah, it's been much slower these last few weeks. I continue uploading as I usually do, they just accumulate. I see that images uploaded two days ago are approved, but those uploaded a week ago are still in the queue.
12
« on: February 19, 2024, 05:24 »
13
« on: February 14, 2024, 03:39 »
I upload to fineartamerica and pictorem those photos that I think might look good in a canvas in someone's living room or a mug, but I only make less than $50 a year.
14
« on: February 07, 2024, 04:17 »
Check your spam folder, I received the email instantly, like three days ago.
15
« on: December 04, 2023, 17:43 »
Yeah, same here, 3 approved out of 100 sent this past week.
16
« on: October 12, 2023, 17:19 »
Received my pending $, and some sales have also come in, I suppose those that were made months ago:
Extended License $ 53.26 EyeEm Market
17
« on: October 05, 2023, 09:48 »
"0.66$ per image/video/graphic/template per year."
I have 15k photos, x 0.66$= 9.900$ / per year, so.... nope.
18
« on: September 13, 2023, 07:31 »
Se ha(n) aadido $665.78 extra de fondo de contribuyente de Firefly al saldo disponible. Pago mnimo nico de 1 USD. Ms informacin
An extra $665.78 of Firefly contributor fund has been added to the available balance. Minimum one-time payment of 1 USD. More information
19
« on: May 15, 2023, 03:07 »
The programmers have appropriated copyright work to make their product, and as proved in the paper I referenced that work is still accessible using the right prompts (though this is not all that relevant as the issue is the appropriation of the work for commercial purposes without the copyright owners consent).
Although legally there may be loose details that programmers have infringed upon, the point of AI image creation, as a concept, is exactly the same one that we have all learned to read, write, draw or photograph. I have read dozens of books by cartier bresson, Avedon, Erwit, Leibovitz... and seeing their photos is how I have learned to photograph, and I have created my own photographs with theirs in my mind. That's the same thing they do, and it can't be avoided, because the photos are published, open to anyone's eye.
Years ago you had to pay to enter the museums, now it's not even necessary.
tell that to the musicians who got sued after listening to others work and using it it as "inspiration".
fascinating how many stock photographer seem to have an international law degree.
I think there is a difference between inspiring and plagiarizing, in many cases separated by a fine line. That is why there are thousands of music plagiarism accusation cases that are resolved in favor of the plaintiff and many thousands more in favor of the defendant. I'm just saying that things are not absolute black or white. And personally I have not seen any cases of plagiarism by AIs yet. It is like saying that the first photographer who took a photo of an apple on a white background has the right to accuse the next 30,000 photos of apples on a white background that are in the SS catalog.
20
« on: May 13, 2023, 14:44 »
The programmers have appropriated copyright work to make their product, and as proved in the paper I referenced that work is still accessible using the right prompts (though this is not all that relevant as the issue is the appropriation of the work for commercial purposes without the copyright owners consent).
Although legally there may be loose details that programmers have infringed upon, the point of AI image creation, as a concept, is exactly the same one that we have all learned to read, write, draw or photograph. I have read dozens of books by cartier bresson, Avedon, Erwit, Leibovitz... and seeing their photos is how I have learned to photograph, and I have created my own photographs with theirs in my mind. That's the same thing they do, and it can't be avoided, because the photos are published, open to anyone's eye. Years ago you had to pay to enter the museums, now it's not even necessary.
21
« on: May 09, 2023, 03:01 »
yeah, 22 days here. If more photos come in than come out, the queue will increase little by little, until the wave passes. You have to start uploading the content for Christmas right now!
22
« on: January 18, 2023, 01:51 »
Very stable over the last year, after a decline since 2021, the same pattern as Dreamstime and other small agencies.
24
« on: July 18, 2022, 08:56 »
Yes , 4 hours ago in my paypal.
25
« on: July 16, 2022, 08:26 »
Yeah:
"Hey,
Thank you so much for your patience around our payouts to you, our community.
As you may be aware Talenthouse AG has undergone a significant corporate process involving merging companies, which means we arent able to get payments processed as quickly as wed hoped. Were disappointed that we were unable to pay you on time, and are working tirelessly to ensure payment is received smoothly from now on.
Rest assured you absolutely will be paid. Were preparing our next payment schedules so well aim to get you paid within the next few weeks.
Thank you again for your patience and for bearing with us as we organise internally. We couldnt do what we do without you."
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|