MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Red Dove

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 31
126
Shutterstock.com / Re: 48000000 images
« on: February 11, 2015, 09:59 »
I've said this before but the difficulty in this business is how to extrapolate any useful data from these numbers - without being able to drill down.

SS has 48m images but how many of those actually sell more than once. How many are cats and dogs? Or landscapes that are basically mud and grass with bits of trees sticking out of them.

They have 70k contributors - but how many of those people are active? How many images do people upload by month and what is the distribution of uploading i.e. what percentage upload >100 or >10 or less than 10.

I use Stock Performer and my own records and I make my decisions based on these numbers and my own additional research....Otherwise all I would have to go on are these meaningless top level statistics and personal anecdotes.

I don't expect the agencies to produce that data because of the competition but this is why I rarely read the "doom and gloom" stuff  - there is nothing there for me.

PS. There is no doubt in my mind that some of the people who joined in 2011 to 2014 when we were saying the exact same things are absolutely raking it in. Great ports, contemporary style, creative concepts and compositions, market savvy and a huge work ethic....I envy them.

127
Shutterstock.com / Re: 48000000 images
« on: February 10, 2015, 13:06 »
The rate of growth may level off, but growth is a given. What's everyone doing to pivot?

Now THAT is the question.

128
Shutterstock.com / Re: 48000000 images
« on: February 10, 2015, 10:25 »
One can never have enough tomatoes 698,000, coffee beans 149,000 or Piles of Wood 54,000


129
Shutterstock.com / Re: 48000000 images
« on: February 10, 2015, 09:18 »
I'm not impressed mate.

Instagram averages 70 million a day. Also, SS has 583,000 images of cats and dogs, 434,000 images of roses, 1.3 million images of pretty girls smiling but less than 10 images of the Duck Billed Platypus.

130
Off Topic / Re: UAS and Model Aircraft - AKA "Drones"
« on: February 10, 2015, 04:45 »
Those goddamn commies and their drone thingamabubs. If I see one within a mile of my property I'll take a twelve gauge to it and that'll be all she wrote.

131
Shutterstock.com / Re: Disappearing Sale
« on: February 09, 2015, 17:54 »
Stock Performer seems to be in step with the real numbers - but the SS site appears to be having a spasm at present with upload thumbnails not appearing, inaccurate figures for images awaiting review etc. etc.

Much as I like SS this is a poor show and seems to be happening more often. I'm giving up until tomorrow.

132
iStockPhoto.com / Re: When will iStock stabilize?
« on: February 09, 2015, 17:43 »
STABLE: Firmly fixed or not likely to move or change

STABLE: A structure for housing dumb livestock

Both apply I think.

134
I don't believe in paying for results before they've actually happened unless it involves medication or sex. So I've passed them up.

135
Shutterstock.com / Re: No more resubmission form
« on: February 04, 2015, 06:31 »
Good news!

If you received a rejection (pertaining to quality, metadata, releases, etc) and you would like to resubmit a corrected version you are welcome to do that without contacting our support department prior to resubmission.

I don't like it.....The bit about metadata and releases is sensible and I like that you can now resubmit images with "quality" issues fixed, without contacting support for a case number -  but I would prefer that people still had to justify a resubmit in a comment field. Otherwise those with images where quality is blatantly irretrievable or who think everyone else apart from themselves is an amateur will continue to bang in their failed work until they get a positive review or a warning. Not good for the contributor community as a whole in my opinion.

136
General - Top Sites / Re: Fotolia beats Shutterstock
« on: February 03, 2015, 14:49 »
"Fotolia beats Shutterstock" - not in my Universe, although I do subscribe to the multiple universe/dimension theory.

FT are performing very well and I enjoyed a BME there in January - but they are still being comprehensively beaten into third place. Let's see what those hippies over at Adobe can do.

137
Shutterstock.com / Re: No more resubmission form
« on: February 03, 2015, 14:40 »
It seems a bit churlish to say you can't resubmit a corrected version with a note when an image was rejected for poor lighting/white balance. As for composition/focus point or not suitable for editorial....well they usually get me on these and if I absolutely disagree I use submit@shutterstock. I find them very fair and comprehensive in their feedback and much faster than any other agency out there.

I doubt SS would have done this unless the volume of resubmits is proving to be an efficiency cost - and the bean counters will always demand a process change over an increase in headcount to cope. And frankly, if it deters those of our colleagues who will not take no for an answer and resubmit over and over, making reviewers very cross, it might just lead to a fairer more consistent review process for the rest of us.

Anyway, this is a small thing and they really need to work on bigger issues: site performance, knackered uploading, etc, etc.

PS. No comment on illustrations - I stopped submitting any when they made the process too convoluted with attachments of originals/property releases and such

138
I read the "brief but titillating taste" and concluded I wouldn't pay a cent for that crap let alone three and a half dollars.

Nice pic, shame about the usage but there it is.

139
General - Top Sites / Re: The Wall
« on: February 01, 2015, 18:48 »
I'm sure there are people who have read or contributed to this thread for whom "the wall" does not exist, financially or creatively.

An Uncle of mine built an income that allowed him to retire from the corporate treadmill before he was 50, firstly by teaching himself carpentry and progressing from fitting kitchens to making bespoke furniture and even pro-spec crossbows before moving onto ornate, wooden clocks and picture frames. If he ever hit a wall, which I seriously doubt, he clearly found a way over, around or under it.

 

140
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock sales is sinking deeply...
« on: January 31, 2015, 09:26 »
Ironically, arriving sweaty and lost at an airport at midnight is how I avoid doing those other things which you despair about.

I envy you and when I was a whippersnapper I wasn't worried - but now I'm older flip flops and rucksacks are out. I prefer to have my luggage on wheels and my hotel in easy reach of a Mercedes, driven by someone who doesn't smell of boiled onions. ;)

PS. Apologies for straying off topic.

141
Worthless - correct spelling.

142
General - Top Sites / Re: The Wall
« on: January 31, 2015, 03:36 »
For me the wall is not running out of creativity, its financial.

Good point and why icebergs or beautiful people prancing about in Gucci don't feature in my port.

If I were brand new at this or any business though, I'd want someone to tell me not to be worrying about walls and focus on getting my pigs to market.

143
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock sales is sinking deeply...
« on: January 31, 2015, 03:17 »
I have a different calculation, which is whether it lets me live as I choose.

100% on this one - not having some tit in a suit telling me I have to "work on networking my personal brand" or having to sit in meetings and stare at a stale croissant, or pretending I care about mission statements, or listening to hours of gobbledygook at seminars, or having to watch my back constantly, or arriving sweaty and lost at some airport in the middle of nowhere at midnight is worth a million smackers to me.

144
General - Top Sites / Re: The Wall
« on: January 30, 2015, 07:15 »
Some days I think I've hit a wall but the next day I wake up and I'm raring to go. Like anything creative there are times when the ideas won't come - but I do like this quote about writing from Terry Pratchett: There's no such thing as writer's block. That was invented by people in California who couldn't write.

Personally, I believe if you start worrying about walls you can end up building them. And you can quote me on that.

145
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock sales is sinking deeply...
« on: January 30, 2015, 06:59 »
I've got some right duffers in my port and I'm sure everybody has. This isn't art, although some would like to think it is. Having said that, there is room for art of course but I'll bet there are images of a pencil sharpener out there that outsell images of some elfin girl prancing through a wheat field back lit by a setting sun.

We have a saying in England: Where there's muck there's brass. Loosely translated, crap makes money. The trick is finding the right sort of crap and making it look fit for purpose.

146
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock sales is sinking deeply...
« on: January 28, 2015, 08:51 »
I wish fellow microstockers would stop pointing at other people's work or a person's earnings level/age in the business as a reason for deterioration in their own sales.

Besides which, the contributor highlighted has 50,000 images accepted and that says a lot about a work ethic which many of us (myself included) would do well to emulate.

147
Shutterstock.com / Re: Predictions For Microstock For 2015
« on: January 28, 2015, 06:48 »
As of January 2015 there are over 3 billion active internet users, 3.6 billion mobile phone users. Take those numbers to any entrepreneur and claim the opportunity for well crafted visual content is no longer there and they will push you out the door and start up a new photography/video/design business on the spot.

http://wearesocial.net/blog/2015/01/digital-social-mobile-worldwide-2015/

148
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock sales is sinking deeply...
« on: January 28, 2015, 06:37 »
This thread is about as useful as the Doom and Gloom thread over at SS....all problems and no solutions. Then again, most of us know it is unwise to offer solutions in business until you've milked the opportunity dry yourself.

149
Newbie Discussion / Re: Introduction and keywording question
« on: January 26, 2015, 06:21 »
You can make very good money believe it or not but as well as output, nowadays you need business savvy and the ability to change both your content and style at the drop of a hat.

As said above, keyword bias varies from site to site but if you factor in both phrases and good descriptive keywords you can't go wrong.

150
"bottom line", "adding value", "outsourcing", "streamlining" are power words for shareholders and a source of outright glee whenever they see/hear them being used. I once attended an AGM where the company was basically going to the dogs but shareholders floated out of the hall on a wave of euphoria, simply because the CEO used all the right buzzwords. He could have given them a handful of magic beans instead of a dividend by the time he was finished. Sheeple - most of them.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 31

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors