151
General Stock Discussion / Re: Funny Political Use Stock Related Story
« on: March 11, 2011, 18:06 »
Your Famous, LISA
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
General Stock Discussion / Re: Funny Political Use Stock Related Story« on: March 11, 2011, 18:06 »
Your Famous, LISA
153
General Stock Discussion / Re: Sh#t hits the fan again at iStockphoto« on: March 11, 2011, 00:43 »Do we really need two threads about this? The magnitude of this loss; heck yeah! Maybe three threads 154
Cameras / Lenses / Re: I love my RS-4 Camera strap« on: March 10, 2011, 18:50 »
I agree 100%; if you have never used a RS-4 you are missing the boat; complete change in the way straps are made and the way they work.
For 30 years, my chest and shoulders have been beat to heck by poor camera straps; now carrying a camera is so easy, even with a long tele 155
Newbie Discussion / Re: Future Business- Tax Concerns« on: March 10, 2011, 17:50 »
I have been self-employed for 25 years, first 20 as scientist and last five as photographer. I have used my home as business place and deducted it in the past; I have taken many trips and deducted them; just be fair and reasonable, have documentation for everything and you will have little problems. A visit by IRS is not end of world, just stressful; provided you have been honest.
156
123RF / Re: 123RF Serves Termination Notice to Pixmac« on: March 10, 2011, 17:19 »
I, for one, appreciate that someone has come forward and admitted something wrong was done, it was Pixmac fault and they are willing to own the responsibility for this error. I got really tired of the "smokin mirror" routine by Zager saying it was a misunderstanding. "Bullsh*t"
I have made plenty of mistakes in my life; I plan to make a few more. When I make a mistake, I am honest and admit my mistake and take ownership of that mistake and attempt to make it right. I don't hide behind legal-mumble-jumble saying I can not comment because of pending legal problems. The truth will come out, admitting the truth will not hurt any legal case. You want our images; then show us the respect and stop the "smokin mirrors" routine. I am willing to trust someone that will be transparent; even if they have made mistakes in the past. I assume you are human, I expect you to muck-up once in-a-while or have an employee that mucks up. Remember, these images are our life-blood; they are how we feed ourselves and our family. If someone steals them, we have lost everything. 157
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Contributors Exceeding Upload Limits« on: March 10, 2011, 16:52 »
To be honest, I tried to get some in but was unable to find the portal to extra uploads. I tried deepmeta, lightburner and ftp; all failed to show up in my area.
158
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections« on: March 10, 2011, 05:48 »The seasoned self preserving stock pros here who have commented have clearly given off the "Leave it to the big boys and go away and play with your dolls" vibe. Oh, that was just Rinder spouting off, he was having a bad day or needed a martini, or something; if you read his entire post, it is pretty spot on-microstock is a professional business; there are lots of folks that just want to sell a few images to impress their family or friends. I don't see a problem with the casual user; if my stuff is good enough, it will rise to the top soon enough. Hopefully I have not starved to death by the time it starts to rise so I can enjoy some of the monetary rewards; if not, then my children will enjoy the rewards of my hard work ![]() Then again, I am in a pretty specialized field; not to many casual snappers out here in Tiger country (Far East Russia); now if the SS reviewers will just understand the lighting is not always perfect in the wild I will be happy. They want studio lighting out here in the naked outdoors; I am lucky to see an animal once a week, much less have it in perfect light. 159
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections« on: March 10, 2011, 05:44 »put in your photos with CRE and see how well you fare. They are very strict on their photo selections... heard alot of complaints about Crestock, no problems with their reviews, running at 100% 160
General Stock Discussion / Re: Do You Ever Use Your Lens Hood?« on: March 10, 2011, 05:19 »and it is not unusual for me to bang glass into sitting guests heads, etc. let me know when you are in the room, prefer to sit on the other side from you ![]() 161
General Macrostock / Re: just testing!« on: March 10, 2011, 05:07 »testing to see if my post comes in. what post, i don't see any post 162
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Buyers Bailing on Istock« on: March 10, 2011, 02:41 »Well, this isn't a buyer bailing, but it sure is a frustrated buyer: http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=312262&page=1 Actually, this is a marketing ploy, marketing 101; at fast food restaurants they teach the cashiers If a customer orders a coke and does not say the size; you ask them "large?", you don't ask them "what size?". Granted, at IS they are not asking, they have the box checked and expect the buyer to make another choice. 164
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Micromanaging the istock Forums« on: March 09, 2011, 22:08 »Micromanaging?There is an old proverb in my country: Good thing you are not from St. Petersburg, Florida (my former and future home). In St. Pete, "Give a cop a gun and he is going to shoot someone" 165
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Royalties lower than 2004!« on: March 09, 2011, 19:06 »
I have heard they have applied for trademark of the name "iSuck"
![]() 167
Adobe Stock / Re: Payment« on: March 09, 2011, 18:23 »Fotolia has been really slow with payments this year. Wonder if it's official policy now. Be happy Elena, the US Dollar to Ruble is not so great either; also off topic 168
General Stock Discussion / Re: Is it the end of microstock and royalty free« on: March 09, 2011, 07:40 »Or in other words - It walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck but to keep the french happy lets call it a cow. +1 COW ![]() "French Fries"; "French Toast" 169
General Stock Discussion / Re: Is it the end of microstock and royalty free« on: March 09, 2011, 06:58 »
It is possible the French will win a few battles but ultimately; they will lose the war. In the process, the RF sites will have even more reason to cut our fees just to claim they need money to fight these court battles.
170
Newbie Discussion / Re: Getting Accepted on iStock« on: March 09, 2011, 04:38 »
Tom
we really are a pretty good group of people; but our humor and interpersonal relationship skills set is lacking. seriously, you are entering a mature market filled with many talented photographers; if you want to be among the group-you will need to achieve similar results, especially for the application you like tennis; get your thinking cap on and think of some excellent shots; ball on the top of the net, ball hitting racket, ball hitting line with multiple flash, 171
Alamy.com / Re: Submission nightmare!« on: March 09, 2011, 04:28 »
Race:
Laughing my **S off; take a "chill pill", sip a beer or something ![]() 172
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Royalties lower than 2004!« on: March 09, 2011, 01:58 »When IS introduced the last paycut just a few months ago, I restarted submitting to nearly all (very) minor microstock sites which I abandoned long ago due to lack of sales. Well, now my total % from those sites -excluding the top and middle tiers - is 2%. Not much, but it was 0% before. And it's going slightly up each month, while IS is going slightly down. 173
123RF / Re: 123RF Serves Termination Notice to Pixmac« on: March 08, 2011, 23:24 »
Thanks; sometimes it seems more a nightmare but it is one of my choosing; so i guess I can always wake up if I don't like the dream/nightmare 174
Lighting / Re: Lightbox question« on: March 08, 2011, 22:14 »
need more details, is this a translucent box with lights directed from outside or is this a white box (cardboard or foamboard) with bounced light from front. What are you shooting, it is still life, if still, why is flourscent not enough?
175
Computer Hardware / Re: Are CF Cards Extinct?« on: March 08, 2011, 22:11 »
Sorry, never tried the video feature and never plan to try it. Just not interested in video.
|
Submit Your Vote
|