pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - YadaYadaYada

Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64]
1576
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock Photo Market Crash
« on: April 13, 2009, 16:10 »
no I'm not a pedal pansy

1577
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock Photo Market Crash
« on: April 13, 2009, 12:11 »
http://unsharpmasked.com/blog/2008/05/2008-stock-photo-market-crash/



C'mon, catch-up. According to most reports this is 2009 already.


Is what he wrote wrong or are people here just "whistling past the graveyard" to ignore the truth. If this comes true as predicted in 2010 do you say it's old news. When I read the subjects here it seems that people are agreeing with what he said but defending when somebody else points out the same thing.

1579
General - Top Sites / Re: Is iStock worth the effort?
« on: March 17, 2009, 11:53 »
I managed to get a few accepted, none have sold.     You have to keyword everything in their unique scheme, and it's tedious.  Some of the rejections made at least some sense, others were just off the wall.    Reviews and appeals take weeks.  There's more, but why go on. ..

Way too many hoops here for me.  If they ever sell one I might submit some more.

They should change their name to PITAphoto.



Tough call when someone has 5 photos accepted in 1 month and wants sales or else. When you get done shooting things you found around the house you might do better.

1580
Good work making the survey the results will be interesting.

1581
General Stock Discussion / Re: Get Paid Shooting Nothing
« on: February 01, 2009, 14:48 »

 That to me is someone trying to control the response of others through aggressive verbal remarks. More flies with honey my friend. ;D You don't have to cover something in sugar to be polite and courteous it is just being reasonable and respectful. ;)
 Once again, if you don't like the post just don't read it but maybe try to bring the expletive's down a notch if you want people to here you. There are people on this site that are concerned to speak up because of responses like that.
 I would much rather get as many contributors as possible talking here. Maybe next time unless it is a question or informative you might choose your words more carefully before posting, or not. ::) Thanks for your time. :)

2 Cents,
AVAVA

Considering the amazing display of venom you spewed out on New Years Eve, I'm surprised 'reasonable' and 'respectful' are in your vocabulary. I wonder what your kids would have thought if they'd seen it. Not many did though as the thread and your previous identity soon went south.

After that I would consider you the last person to preach on forum etiquette.

This thread has officially been hijacked. :(

1582
Gimmestock.com / Re: WERE is gimmestock anyone
« on: January 26, 2009, 14:20 »
Pathetique 69470 images XXL $1 nearly no sales you will make payout in 2020.

1583
Shutterstock.com / Re: Another image thief at SS
« on: December 23, 2008, 16:56 »
You take photos have them stolen or have concepts stolen while sites sell them for peanuts. You work to take pictures that are rejected for dumb reasons and complain that reviews take to long. Then we drool on our face being happy that we made a sale for a dollar and complain that it takes two weeks to get paid.
You came here anonymously which doesn't help with your credibility. You only made a few posts and most are complains about microstock. All serious traditional photo stock businesses already realised that microstock business model works and allows to earn quite substantial money. You are too late mate (by a couple of years) :)


 4 out of 5 chose to attack me instead of problems. These people get a free pass for same complaints.



25 cents or $5.00 both amount are ridiculously low and there is no real difference.  Neither amount will buy a new camera, pay for a studio, models, computer or internet. 


SS is the only site that has developed the kind of volume that makes sense of the subs model. Everywhere else it's dribs and drabs - just enough to be irritating but not enough to really add to the bottom line each month.


It gets old waiting a year, two years, almost three years to reach a first payout, and the idea of waiting another year or two or three for another payout seems totally ridiculous.

LOL :D that is really funny and the contributor is probably a 13old hacker from siberia  ;D.
I doubt that a fraud like this is possible at places like Corbis or Getty so maybe another reason why buyers prefer places like this.

Keep an eye out on all the major microstock sites for your own images uploaded under a different username. So far, I've found that someone has stolen (and re-uploaded) a large collection of my portfolio at Fotolia and BigStockPhoto. I have a large portfolio at both agencies, so the thieves obviously aren't very bright.

Just today, someone bought up $250 worth of my portfolio at BigStockPhoto with a stolen credit card.

Quote
Not been a good year for me at FT....Subs,odd rejections,below par sales, and now this!

Bad of them to let this out without any announcement too. I'm way off moving up anyway so I wont be affected, but I feel sorry for those about to jump up a level. Cry

All in all unfair treatment yet again from them!


This forum is comprised mostly of casual and part-timers with absolutely no professional experience,

I am sure a lot of others are like me, sick of the boards being spoiled by bullying and petty jealousy.

I agree

1584
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Las Vegas loves iStock!
« on: December 23, 2008, 16:45 »

Today I discovered quite by accident that a medium 6MP image works just fine on a huge movie screen.  Here's Photoshop guru Scott Kelby dancing on stage in front of one of my photos!


Good phot good use.

1585
None of the above until they start charging more for mine work and paying more. You can make more begging on a street corner.

Speak for yourself, YadaYadaYada.

I do only for myself.

1586
Shutterstock.com / Re: Another image thief at SS
« on: December 20, 2008, 07:45 »
dgool steals all his photos and brags about best seller and uploads a microsoft windows background as his own lying that he made the picture. This is the low life that inhabits microstock. dgool couldn't shoot his own foot with a shot gun. You take photos have them stolen or have concepts stolen while sites sell them for peanuts. You work to take pictures that are rejected for dumb reasons and complain that reviews take to long. Then we drool on our face being happy that we made a sale for a dollar and complain that it takes two weeks to get paid.

1587
None of the above until they start charging more for mine work and paying more. You can make more begging on a street corner.

1588
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Las Vegas loves iStock!
« on: December 20, 2008, 06:51 »
Miltimillion dollar casinos pay a dollar for a photo from microstock to show on the LCD screens. How stupid do photograpers feel when they get robbed like this for their work. Peanuts are for monkeys but photographers get peanuts for microstock brag about getting cheated with low pay and are happy. Maybe you can get a book to buy a picture for 49p and brag about that to. Don't wake up the microstock sites need you.

1589
Dreamstime.com / Re: Featured DT photographer on Alamy
« on: December 10, 2008, 14:23 »
Okay i checked he is not exclusive at iStock but he should really change the L-license at Alamy and the exclusive status at FT and DT otherwise he is in trouble.


Exclusive DT series is on Alamy Licensed. http://tinyurl.com/6j9dww  He's breaking the rules at many sites including Alamy. Does anyone rom DT or FT read these subjects.

1590
Alamy.com / Re: alamy contributor event 2008 video
« on: December 01, 2008, 23:46 »
I'm assuming if i were to put them under rights protected it would get a higher rank?

Because most of my stuff is exclusive to them right now anyway so how could i go about changing that? or its too late and only my new work can be put rights protected?



ranking has nothing to do with the way you set the license. rights managed exclusive is the buyers terms not your choice. all they did was change the name from licensed to rights managed exclusive, exclusive use by the buyer, not Alamy exclusive photos. You need to read the changes and contract again.

http://www.alamy.com/notice-board-1108.asp

1591
Microstock News / Re: Moodboard
« on: November 12, 2008, 23:40 »
Watermarks were a big complaint for the last year on other sites. LO for exampl http://www.microstockgroup.com/index.php?topic=2472.0 now it's not important.  :-\

1592
Microstock News / Re: Moodboard
« on: November 11, 2008, 12:57 »
The site looks good - almost like another Lucky Oliver.  Anyone selling anything there? 


At moodboard we dont make photographers jump through hoops to see higher earnings.  If pictures are strong enough from the outset, and photographers are happy to give us image exclusivity, well team them with the moodboard collection that enhances their best features.

Another micro dead end site added to the list and a weak watermark.


Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors