MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cdwheatley

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20
276
Really slow from the 22nd of Dec. to the 3rd of Jan.

277
Thanks guys,

 Good input. CD sir you are right I owe you a beer. But don't forget the other end of the lens as well. Keep shooting.

Bet,
AVAVA

Is there still a place in downtown Seatle that serves (Widmer Hepa*&&%*&^* spelling??) on tap. Good beer!!!  :)

278
123RF / Re: Do you make $100/month at 123RF?
« on: November 24, 2008, 14:52 »
Right around $100.00 a month since may, 300-550 images with no upward trend.

279
I only say that because I noticed a difference going from 13 mp to 21mp. I would imagine going to 45mp would be quite a jump in magnification. Same reason you need better glass with the larger cameras because they look like sh***t at 100%  :)

Its the same thing with audio and extremely high sample rates. Not much margin for error because you can hear everything.

280
I'm talking about the difference between shooting with 8mp vs. 45mp.  All things being equal it would be much harder to get a sharp image at 45mp or perceived sharpness..no?? all problems being magnified that much more.

Then again, if you downsized from 45mp back to 8mp things would be equal again.

281
I am wondering if a monopod might be necessary to get sharp images at 45 megapixels. Mistakes are magnified that much more at 100% crop, true/false??? Not that you can't get sharp images handheld but your normal percentage might drop a bit which could be frustrating. With that said, I hate using the monopod  :P

282
Off Topic / Re: Looking to rent a camera
« on: November 18, 2008, 18:27 »
ahha!! Thats where that pm came from  :). I haven't been able to find anything up where I'm at. I'm thinking West Palm Beach which is an hour south of me.

Riffmax, What kind of camera are you looking to rent and where do you want to use it?

I have a 5d that you can borrow if you want. You just have to come up and get it  :)

283
Dreamstime.com / Re: Our very own cdwheatley featured!
« on: November 18, 2008, 18:09 »
Mucho appreciated everyone  :)

284
Dreamstime.com / Re: Our very own cdwheatley featured!
« on: November 17, 2008, 17:55 »
Thanks Lisa and Jo Ann :)

 The two of you offer a lot to this community.

285
Dreamstime.com / Re: Our very own cdwheatley featured!
« on: November 17, 2008, 15:01 »
Thanks guys!
Using your wife as a model can be difficult sometimes. I often wonder who is running the show..haha!!

She does have a photogenic "single" younger sister (BTW). She lives in the UK.

286
Dreamstime.com / Re: Our very own cdwheatley featured!
« on: November 17, 2008, 13:29 »
Thanks  :)
I didn't know today was Christmas..ha!!

I did merry the model silly. I'm a lucky dude  :P

Hopefully it helps sales a little?

Made my day/week anyway, love my job!! :)

THANK YOU DREAMSTIME!! :)

287
Off Topic / Re: IS this lightning effect real
« on: November 16, 2008, 20:05 »
The main part of the lightning seems way to thick. The strike looks like it is the size of a house.  The scaling is off.

288
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 10, 2008, 16:27 »
Ok, this is really strange. The monitor from said dead computer is toast as well..hmmm??? I tried hooking it up to 2 new computers and it doesn't work at all, just says no signal. I am starting to think the crazy power fluctuations where I live did the damage. Is this possible??

I live about 10 miles from a nuclear power plant(YIKES!) and power surges are crazy. Almost everything in my house is hooked up to battery backup voltage regulator units except the dead computer and monitor. The battery backup died a few months ago and I never replaced it. Is it possible some components in the computer would get damaged and others not? Just a thought.

Geopappas, I'm not certain if the hard drive is dead or not, I only tried to hook it up once so far and when it didn't respond like the other hard drives I just shut it down and decided to work on it later.

289
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 10, 2008, 12:57 »
GeoPappas,
Thanks for your input. I'm sorry I wasn't more clear about the cd drive, its actually a DVD lightscribe device. The cables are the same as SATA hardrives.

As Tubed mentioned above there are no jumper settings to adjust on SATA drives.

The dead computer beeps once when fired up and then quickly dies after that. I'm not worried about saving the old computer. Sometimes its better for me mentally just to move on..haha!!

The C: drive did have some files on it that I wanted to recover. Nothing too important though. I also have an IDE hard drive from 6 years ago that I want to recover. External drive case sounds like it might work  :)

290
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 09, 2008, 13:05 »
Ok, i realize i am a little late into this conversation, and I may not know what I am talking about but.... here is my two cents...

If the rescue computer isnt booting when you attach the third problem drive.. then it must be trying to boot from that drive or something??  That is set in the bios .. edit: oh yeah.. i bet that is it.  You have your computer set to boot from the CD first (if it can) and then try your hard drives.  Since you are attaching your problem drive to the cd spot, it tries to boot from there first.  So change it to trying to boot from the regular hard drive first (in the bios).  The other drives didnt cause a problem because there was no boot info on them.


if that doesnt work though my suggestion would be to buy an external drive case that you can just slip your problem drive into.  That makes it very simple to just stick your third drive in there and connect it to a usb port and then hopefully access your files.  Once you are done, you have a useful external drive case when the same thing happens again :)

Thanks Leaf,
I suspect you might be right that the computer is trying to boot from the cd rom drive first. The sales guy at the store mentioned the external drive case as well. Could be an easy fix without messing with my bios... At least I know there are many options.

I've put the rescue task on the back burner at the moment but will post here when I figure it out for anyone who is interested.
Thanks again everyone  :)

291
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 08, 2008, 16:05 »
Thanks Rob,

I will probably try the linux thing, thanks for the tip  :)

I think its the mother board because its had some processor overheating problems in the past and it does get power just won't boot.

Its amazing how much cooler the new computers are running now.

292
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 08, 2008, 15:38 »
Tubed,
Ok,  how about in english now  :) that makes my head hurt.

All 3 drives are seagate coming from the dead computer. The C: drive with the OS in it is the only one that will not boot up using the same method I mentioned in my first post.

I am trying to recover the drive by installing it in a new vista 64 system, not sure if it makes a difference but the drive I am trying to recover has 32bit xp-pro on it???

Seems to me,  having the operating system on the drive is the hick-up since the other drives I recovered were recognized right away just like an external hardrive.

As for the dead pc/computer: won't boot at all, light comes on for a second and then power vanishes.

293
Computer Hardware / Re: Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 08, 2008, 14:28 »
dbvirago,
Thanks! no network, not sure if I'm computer savvy enough to use your advice without destroying the new computer. I thought maybe I could just switch a jumper or something so the computer would recognize it as a slave drive. Funny thing, I don't see any jumpers on the sata drives, haha! I'm guessing you have to switch it in bios??? is that right?

Might have to just take it to the shop..hmmm.


Jonathan dude, lol!!
Nope, I'm an idiot!! not the first time. Just extremely unorganized and carefree, some stuff backed up on external drives, some not  :) I'll never learn.

I'm not even sure whats on the drive exactly other than programs and misc. bs. (Its a pc btw) I was hoping for the quick press the botton dummy fix but seems unlikely. Lucky for me the important stuff was on the 2 drives I was able to save. I tried to keep the OS drive just to run programs.

USC should be fine against those hippies up north..haha




294
Computer Hardware / Dead computer hard drive rescue???
« on: November 08, 2008, 12:33 »
I had a computer die with 3 Sata hardrives in it. 2 slave drives and one with the OS on it.
I was able to rescue the files from the 2 slave drives by attaching to the Cd rom cables in a new machine. Computer recognized them like an external hardrive, very relieved:). Bad news is, this isn't working for the 3rd drive with the OS on it...hmmm?

Does anyone know how to get the info off the OS drive? Using the above method the computer won't boot.

Any advice welcome.

295
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The New best match and the 80/20 Rule
« on: November 06, 2008, 11:30 »
If they want to protect their revenue they should make the best match favour the best images not the exclusives, because they have to pay more to the exclusives and customers are likely to prefer the best images at the top wether or not exclusive images.

I would disagree. Even though they make a bigger percentage that image most likely is also at a dozen other sites. This increases the chances of it being purchased somewhere else instead of IS which for IS decreases its download volume, file revenue, and overall value.

Exclusive files increase value for IS as a whole. The more they have of something that someone can't get anywhere else the less influence the competition has on them. They then have more control on their operations and pricing.

If you have the exact same thing that everbody else is offering, what's your competitive advantage? Service or price. And since service really isn't a big factor in micros ("we're the micro with the best service" So what, who cares?) you're left competing on price. And competing prices only go lower.

This makes a lot of sense to me. There must really be a problem with people shopping on Istock and buying at say... Fotolia for peanuts unless contributor is Emerald. Why advertise a file that can be bought cheaper elsewhere. Takes business away and maybe they don't come back?? hmmm??

Obviously not true in all cases but maybe its happening enough to change things around somewhat to see if it makes a difference.

296
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The New best match and the 80/20 Rule
« on: November 05, 2008, 23:59 »
I think what he was trying to say is: that if new files (from old or new contributor) are not allowed to climb up the best match, the collection would eventually start looking a little stale.

Does anyone know how a file climbs best match these days? The few sales I have had on new files don't seem to be helping much.

297
Software - General / Re: my test: PS CS3 vs CS4
« on: October 28, 2008, 21:54 »
I have no idea how much of a difference 64 bit makes over 32 bit, not an expert. But, I will say that I don't find myself waiting for things to happen like my 32bit dual core system, mainly with mark III files,  5d worked fine.

Everything moves much faster with very little lag. It gets pretty anoying when you are zoomed in trying to paint levels or something and there is lagtime to see what you've just painted. Its hard to work like that.

Anyone that does a lot of photoshopping and is considering buying the new 5d, be aware that you might need to upgrade your computer also.

Since cs4 was designed with 64bit in mind, I would bet there will be some benefits to running 64 bit instead of 32bit. Just have to wait and see I guess.


edit:
I just did the same test on 12.9mp 5d files and it took 23 seconds..

298
Software - General / Re: my test: PS CS3 vs CS4
« on: October 28, 2008, 20:35 »
Just for fun I tried the same test on cs3 with 21mp mark III running a quad core with Vista 64 and 6gb ram. It finished right around 39 seconds..  :)

299
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS Changes best match Algorithm Again!
« on: October 22, 2008, 18:06 »
Hoping things change here also. It will be important to see what happens from here. Will files that get downloaded move up the best match? Or will it just stay as it is? I don't see any movement at this point.

I would like to think they would let the files that are selling the most drift back to the front. Heavy weighting by views seems a little silly. Hopefully they are just mixing up the order a bit as a starting point.

300
Off Topic / Re: LOL
« on: October 21, 2008, 23:25 »
Hillarious!!! :D

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors