pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - a.k.a.-tom

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 44
301
LuckyOliver.com / Re: Last payout from Lucky Oliver...
« on: July 17, 2008, 12:48 »
Got mine first week of July... as they said i should ("end of june").   8)=tom

302
Shutterstock.com / Re: how fast SS reviews nowdays ?
« on: July 16, 2008, 16:44 »
I haven't uploaded anywhere in a few months.... then just did some at SS last week and got reviewed and approved in 24 hours. 

303
General Stock Discussion / Re: Will you or Won't you??
« on: July 16, 2008, 16:42 »
With patience in short supply these days and contributors anxiously looking for return (and rightly so) on their work from new agencies- How about the next "Start Up" site?

Will you be diving straight in and uploading your full port or adopting a "Wait & See" approach?


I am really gun shy now......     8)=tom

304
Microstock News / Re: Another victim...
« on: June 27, 2008, 15:42 »
Whoa!!

 I just checked it out and I am pretty sure that's all Darrell's work.  I sent an email off to him asking some details.
    Such as if he will be asking in other photogs.... who knows.. he may be wanting to keep it exclusive this time around....

if he mails me back, maunger,  I'll let you know.   8)=tom

305
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia missing credits?
« on: June 21, 2008, 08:33 »
gee,  where have I heard all this before?    to this day ( couple years later) I have not been given an explanation. 

306
Adobe Stock / Re: Legal or illegal site?
« on: June 19, 2008, 22:07 »
fotolia...      gee where have I heard that name popping up before....

307
General Stock Discussion / Re: What about USPhotoStock
« on: June 19, 2008, 22:00 »
riffmax.... there are plenty of threads on usps going back years......   they have a history around here... 

check out their stats...   largest folio vs sales     you should quickly see for yourself if  it is worth it.  btw,  I was with usps for over a year, emphasis on was. 

308
General Stock Discussion / Re: boss site for nature
« on: June 18, 2008, 16:08 »

Dullegg, Why don't you just build the portfolio and try a local gallery.
Your satisfaction with truly appreciative audience at the gallery would
be better served, then seeing "once in a lifetime" shots "splattered all over the place".

Agreed! This has also worked for me. For sure, try the gallery route.   

Something else that opened some doors (actually a lot of doors),   we donated some of our large landscape/nature prints  to charity auctions.  The pictures pulled in some very respectable money and.... the 'advertising' did us good. We got nice response (other sales and for hire work) and...  helped the reputation of, and name recognition of our company locally.  Also, by networking with the other 'donators' and auction buyers, we've have become a first consideration when someone needs a picture taken.
  One example.  A picture was needed of a historic building. I went out, spent about 10 minutes, shot about 6 pix, submitted one....  $500. 

I am a big advocate of pimping your own work. Instead of pennies for a sale(in the micros),  you could pull in hundreds and even light 4 digit money when you are published. Try it!!!   Definitely, try charity auction, just have your name and/or company name out there for all to see. Advertise, advertise, advertise.   8)=tom

309
melastmohican--  Quite often you can find out how your work is being used just by sufing the net under your name, tag or name of the picture.  I've found plenty of my stuff out there. I just found one last night.  Some Maine tourism agency is currently using one of my pix on their title page. Give it a shot, see what turns up.
      This kind of tags onto one of your other threads.  Nature/landscape does sell....   it just doesn't sell well.  Again, try pimping your own work. Shoot out some emails, snail mails and make some phone calls.
     As far as restrictions,  while most agencies are pretty much the same, there are minor differences.  As advised, you need to fine tooth comb the agreements you made with each site.  8)=tom

310
Crestock.com / Re: Enough is enough
« on: June 18, 2008, 15:43 »
They must not be interested in nature shots.


Bro, most micros aren't interested in nature shots. I know, I've been pushing them for years now. It's not that the pix are bad (mine aren't and your's probably aren't either), it's just that most micros don't have a customer base that are interested. You gotta remember, they are in business to make money. They aren't going to load up on nature shots if they can't sell them. We've seen micros devoted exclusively to nature....   go belly up.
    As some had mentioned in another thread, you'd do better with your nature work going RM in the macros...  or sell direct to publishers and art directors.
  Don't take it so personal.  Fact is, if you want to have a shot in this micro biz, you have to have a pretty diversified portfolio.   Branch out a little and you'll do fine.   8)=tom

311
General Stock Discussion / Re: boss site for nature
« on: June 16, 2008, 22:28 »
thanks tom , thanks leaf...
what about selling direct to nature magazines eg ducks unlimited,etc...
or are we talking big time difficult impossibilities...
ie. like dreaming of selling to nat geog.  ::)
thanks ppl!

That's what I'm currently doing.  I was first noticed in the micros, then contacted by an editor in a large publishing comp.  Of course, it's work selling yourself too.  That's the advantage of micros and macros,  they do that part.  But, they also take a large cut of the pie.  By free lancing direct,  I'm not sharing the pie with anyone else.  Is it easy?  Well, let me put it this way.   If it was easy,   there wouldn't be micro and macro agencies.   
   But it's possible. Honestly, I was in the right place at the right time.   ..........and no,  I don't think I'll ever make it to Nat Geo. I'm not that good.   LOL 8)=tom
 

312
General Stock Discussion / Re: boss site for nature
« on: June 16, 2008, 16:52 »
IS and SS  both give me reasonable return on my nature shots. I won't get  rich on my nature stuff in micros.  I do far better  pimping my work myself.  Natural Life Stock was supposed to be  'pure nature',  but it started taking on anything out of a camera.... and it failed.  I had a decent 'folio there and never sold one pic in the year it was in extistence.

Landscape/nature will sell on micro,  but it does not sell well.  AND as you've been advised,  that which sells is usually unique and well above the average. So  dullegg, if that's all your shooting,  forget making a bundle in micros.

Macro and RM will serve you much better.   If I stumble across another micro 'nature' site,  I'll let you know.  Please do the same.  8)=tom

313
Featurepics.com / Re: No sale in 4 months!
« on: June 15, 2008, 21:53 »
Never sold a pic on FP.    8)=tom

314
I confess I used the translator.  My russian has waned since I learned it in the military back in 1969-70.  Ya don't use it, you lose it.  Some I can read and understand...., some.. I can't any longer.  My fluency has dropped to the level of tv & movie russki.  Welcome, none the less! 8)=tom

315
i'll reply this afternoon. 8)-tom

Modified:     
Здравствуйте. Мой русский не той, какой она была. Я забыл многое начиная с 1970 года. Добро пожаловать на MSG. 8)=tom

316

this is my first thread, ....


Nice job, fotoKmyst!    Indeed,  WE asked THEM to look at OUR pix.  They didn't ask us.. just to turn them around and tell us they sucked.

 Enjoyed your first, hope to see more.   

BTW, if you can get a compliment out of the MIZ...  you really are doing well!! :D   I too enjoy MIZmania!!  It's the best!!   8)=tom


317
Adobe Stock / Re: Censorship at his best on FT forums...
« on: June 13, 2008, 06:56 »
funny to read these comments.... I have almost come to a stop uploading to ALL my micros...  In over a month, I've  only sent 3 pix to SS (all rejected, didn't like the way I cropped them...pix of a hydroelectric dam) and 2 of the same pix to StockXpert (not reviewed since 5/24 & will probably be rejected there too).

I am not totally ready to give up on SS & IS.... but all others INCLUDING FT (which I gave up on well over a year ago)....   I stopped.

I'm prepping all my work for Alamy now.  Unless you have a folio the size of  the Congressional Library... the ROI is becoming less and less attractive in the bulk of the micros.    ....at least for me.

 8)=tom

318
bluewren... welcome to the gang!!!    8)=tom

319
General Stock Discussion / Re: Them and Us Challenge
« on: June 10, 2008, 15:37 »
no problem  8)=tom

320
Adobe Stock / Re: I am going to buy Mercedes S class!
« on: June 09, 2008, 16:02 »
... I had my first subscription sale today, 0.27! yeah! I am in dillema now, whether to buy Mercedes or BMW?

Not bad choices, Chode.... but I'm a little partial to another.

With my first sub sale I'm getting me an Audi AS8 ABT...  yeah.. that's what I'm getting! 8)=tom


p.s.  I'll probably start with the plastic model I saw the other day at Wally World for only $5.69...  and tax.

321

The point:  I shoot what I want which is primarily landscape & nature, and I get paid to do it  and I am still doing what I enjoyed doing when I shot my first 35mm picture  47 years ago.

I'm a lot like you in the sense that I shoot what I like and upload it.  If people buy it, great.  If not, oh well.  I am not really into photographing people.  But I love hiking and nature. :D

I agree with both of you!  If either of you are ever out this way, give me a shout and we'll strap on a backpack and head out on a trail. :D

Watch out!!!   You might just hear a knock on the door!!! LOL....
BTW, Where is 'out this way',  Nativelight? 8)=tom

322
General Stock Discussion / Re: Honeymoon is over...
« on: June 07, 2008, 12:55 »
But they are insignificant so far on most of the sites, so the honeymoon is still going strong.  I don't see all the buyers switching to subscriptions.  It seems that most of them want to pay per download.

Agreed!  Same experience here. There was no sub explosion for me... yeah, a couple, but nothing significant.  8)=tom

323
.
..........I shot a lot of photos before I ever got paid for any of them and would continue to take pictures if I never received another penny because I love it. .....................

I turn 60 in a couple months.  I've been shooting a 35mm since I was 13 years old.   I never sold a pic until less than 2 years ago and only then because my wife asked me if she could post some of my stuff on a microstock site.  I had no clue what the heck that was and I wasn't all that interested.  When the stuff started to sell,  I looked at it.  Wife said, you make more money shooting people on phones, ladies posing 54 different ways on the same chair and the like.  I thought about that,  I did actually spend  several hours shooting isolateds of anything in a little white box ....once.   
    I hated it. This was work.  I didn't want to screw around with models, models idiosyncrasies, model releases and the like... so I never shot people for sale in the microstock world.  I just continue to shoot what I want.  If someone else likes it and wants to buy it, that's okay with me
     If no one else likes it and no one wants to buy it .....  that's okay with me too.

I was soon asked direct from a publisher about my work and after a couple meetings in Starbucks and several cups of coffee later,  I now free lance for hire and have had entire articles written around series of pix I've taken... having fun.  This lead to being noticed elsewhere by others and now.............   my wife and I turn down work.  We pick and choose what we want to do.  I make far, far more bucks doing this than I ever will on microstocks.  I will never forget that I actually felt embarrassed when handed my first check for pix that were published in a magazine article.  That I should be given this much money for having fun out on a trail in the woods hiking with my wife  'n taking pictures. (I don't feel that way anymore, now I just say 'thanks').

   The up side.  We just went away for our anniversary.  Of course we shot pictures.  I will no doubt sell some of those pictures.  And the entire trip will become a write off as a business trip. The lodging, the travel, the food, the phone calls... the works.  I have a great accountant.

The point:  I shoot what I want which is primarily landscape & nature, and I get paid to do it  and I am still doing what I enjoyed doing when I shot my first 35mm picture  47 years ago.

On the other hand,  my wife and daughter are now shooting 'traditional microstock' pix.  They like it, more power to them, I think the will be good at it too.

As for me.....  I look forward to next weekend when I will hike up a mountain trail, be the only human within ear and eyeshot.. and sit on my fat backside until the magic hour when I'll snap off  several dozen pictures......  for my own personal enjoyment.

Then,   .....I'll sell some.  8)=tom

324
.........Shoot what you like and how you like to make it.
Create imagery that matters to you.
Produce work that you can look (back) upon and feel proud of.
Trust that you will be successful if you are passionate enough.

Be the best you can be at making your kind of stuff and you will be rewarded in far more ways than money can ever matter. Go for it.


Amen.  I couldn't agree more, SD!!  Well put!   8)=tom

325
....... even I got one...   I would imagine that this was just some generic  bulk mail.  I can't see IS  actively seeking my exclusitivity....  really...
 8)=tom

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 44

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors