MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noodle

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 37
376
Going through my files, out of curiosity..

So, do I belong to jail for titles like this?

qte
Panama City, Panama - August 29, 2015: Panama city skyline is seen at night on August 29, 2015 in Panama, Central America
unqte

That's the word Panama x 4 times and I have a few of those actually :)

This is NOT blatant spamming
Blatant spamming is like the examples they gave prange,prange,prange

This is what happens when a code is written to filter certain criteria and no sensible human checks it over

Mass confusion and anger
Usually happens when you try to do things in a quick way without thinking it through
Multi Billiondollar company run by ijits

377
General Stock Discussion / Re: -
« on: June 30, 2016, 21:00 »
~!!

378
Not spam, some contributers have had images deleted already.
Kurvah"

379
This is bovine feces man!
Some contributers are having images deleted now!

SS has screwed up big time

380
StockPhotoMedia.com / Re: Rude Microstock web site
« on: June 30, 2016, 11:17 »
Why anyone supports these useless little sites like these is a mystery to me.

5000 images and 9$ in sales?
If their a micro and not even in the low earners on the list, that outta tell ya something

381
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens
« on: June 17, 2016, 06:10 »
You can consider renting a lens for your vacation to try before you buy.

383
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Termination
« on: June 10, 2016, 11:47 »
Please Sweetsixty, give us a general idea of what was the problem with your image so maybe we can give you some feedback...

Why? This can only be resolved between him/her and Shutterstock

no...so we can flame him

384
^^ i agree

Just not worth it. Remove it and foggetabout

385
Alamy.com / Re: Any tips on keywording/workflow?
« on: June 03, 2016, 06:30 »
Its automatic

386
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Termination
« on: June 02, 2016, 06:06 »
If  your account is terminated because you used someone elses material, and this seems to be the most common reason for terminating an account, then you have the sympathy of noone.

SS  doesnt terminate accounts nilly willy. 

387
General Stock Discussion / Re: Fotolia new logo
« on: June 01, 2016, 15:46 »
Who cares - just sell images.

388
Not a site I've uploaded to .....any thoughts as to whether they are worth a punt? Why did people leave?

btw "we scaled our sales team" the sort of Corporate gobbledegook I hate presumably they mean "increased"

Thats what i would assume, but you know a scale tips both ways. So you can say it one way while actually meaning the opposite.

Anywho, i also would like to hear from contributers experience with them

389
General Photography Discussion / Re: Rejected
« on: June 01, 2016, 08:13 »
I was going to say there is some serious banding going on :)

It got rejected because if there are names / numbers on boats, motors,etc it needs property release
You can submit as editorial

390
Just submit as editorial - keep ppst processing to a monimum for stock , your only getting pennies

I gather you enjoy shooting planes. If so keep doing it for the joy of it and whatever you can sell and make a few bucks consider it as a bonus

391
It seems that the more ignorant a person is, the more dogmatic they are with their opinion

392
Shutterstock.com / Re: Clip Packs Opt OUT?
« on: May 24, 2016, 21:57 »
No opt out possible

393
Here is a very educational site that you may findhelpful:

Cambridgeincolour.com

394
Alamy.com / Re: Righets Managed
« on: May 19, 2016, 18:06 »
Even if the person is unrecognizable or off inthe distance, you have toanswer "yes" to people in the image.

395
Shutterstock.com / Re: Accepted
« on: May 19, 2016, 05:10 »
If you want critique on it, i suggest posting a 100percent crop in the critique forum on SS or on here if you want.

If you have IS on your camera , it is good to turn it off when using a tripod.
Also, soft is a term used very loosely. Downsizing an image when an image is "soft" can give make it seem sharper. But sometimes soft just really means oof. Cant fix oof in software, has to be nailed when you take the shot.


396
Shutterstock.com / Re: Accepted
« on: May 19, 2016, 04:56 »
The sharpening tool should be used sparingly.
It will not make an oof image infocus, it only gives the illusion of that by increasing the contrast.
Focus should be nailed in camera.

397
Finally, the thiefs port is shut down

Good work you guys!

398
whats your opinion about my profile on fotolia im just debutante : https://us.fotolia.com/p/205952409

Should read " Im just thief"

399
Thats very cool!

Thanks for that!

400
WHAT A DEAL!!!

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 37

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors