MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cascoly
3951
« on: April 15, 2011, 13:19 »
When introducing a new system in beta status, these kind of bugs sometimes happen for non Fortune 500 companies. It is not very pleasant though, but we are working on delivering a good service.
the whole POINT of a beta test is that a small group of outsiders test the product BEFORE it's released on its regular audence. too many companies now think that by labeling something as beta they can get away with releasinbg untested programs on the public. steve
3952
« on: April 15, 2011, 00:57 »
. Do you find that many people buy a download or they just link back to you in exchange for a free image? As I understand the site, you can link back to various size images (so the image will show in a web page, but they haven't actually got the file itself. If they want to buy a downloaded file they pay $1 etc. depending on size and usage?
Steve
exactly - most people to the site dont buy - but it's worth it for the links and the occ'l adsense clicks
3953
« on: April 14, 2011, 13:05 »
in the same place you set the right click protection [security & priivacy], you can also set the largest image you'll allow to be downloaded -- i set all mine to medium. this noly affects the 'share' images, but doesnt restrict what users can buy.
unfortunately, this has to be done for each gallery individually
steve
3954
« on: April 13, 2011, 14:37 »
i use smugmug for my portfolio, and also allow anyone to use websized images if they link back - resulting in a PR 3 for my webpage
steve
3955
« on: March 26, 2011, 12:49 »
first step would be to review the numerous other ideas & discussions on this forum prioposing what you propose. then show us how your idea will be different. a solid proposal which specifically addresses previous problems will still be met by slepticism, but you'll have a better chance
3956
« on: March 22, 2011, 14:18 »
the problem is SS specifically says that editorial is more than just newsworthy - so ANY rejection as 'not newsworthy' is therefore nonsense - there must be some other reason - vreviewers who use that reason must be ignorant or lazy
3957
« on: March 22, 2011, 14:13 »
i've been a wsftp pro user for well over 10 years, but also use filezilla more & more -- oddly they each perform a bit differently - for images now i mostly use filezilla
3958
« on: March 20, 2011, 21:14 »
yep, their rejections have become totally arbitrary - esp fior editorial - their staf stikll think that editorial MUSt be newsworthy when the managers keep saying that's not the case - i just resubmit after aweek or so and they get accepted - real waste of time but they dont seem to care
my other peeve is that stupid hyperalert captcha they use - it's rare i can even read their first attempt - just what are they worried about? other sites with much greater secuerity cocerns use simple 6 letter codes and sem to do fine
3959
« on: March 03, 2011, 15:12 »
>>>>>>:>So I say focus foremost on the first part of the advice I gave: "Find under-represented subject matter." And if you can truly marry that with part two: "offer a bold and unique approach" you'll not only have some of the few available pics for a given search, but you'll secure yourself "best of the bunch" status for some time.
missing in this and other suggestions is any recognition that the images alsoi have to be something that buyers will want and need! i've got plenty of under-represented subjects, but there's a reason they're under-represented! they're not images that designers need!
s
3960
« on: March 02, 2011, 13:38 »
i've had same results recently withSS - rejections of entire batches all with same reasons - "not newsworthy", or "it wont sell", etc where usually they would accept similar. the editorials are the worst - resubmitting gets many of them accepted, but it's a waste of everryone's time having to play this 'guess who's reviewing' game
3961
« on: March 01, 2011, 16:58 »
i use smugmug pro
there's also the open source GALLERY2 which is relatively easy to install and maintain, but does require some php knowledge; it has excellent support onlineif you do encounter problems.
i ran a GALLERY2 site for about a year, but my hosting company was somehow incompatible with a GALLERY2 upgrade and i decicded not to invest the time debugging, so switched to smugmug
s
3962
« on: March 01, 2011, 16:49 »
one bug in their gps locator is that if you start to enter a location, you can't then decide not to - you first get an error msg saying to zoom in, but there's no way to cancel.
it's gpoing to result in a lot of badly tagged images - better to just ttake the gps info if it's supplied w the image
3963
« on: February 25, 2011, 15:41 »
i've conducted this experiment several times over the past few years, inadvertently, while traveling for 3 weeks or more - i've tracked and have never seen any solid correlation.
for most of us, sales are just not reliable indicators from month to month - even with a 3 or 4 month smoothing of the sales curve, there's still too much noise. a few ELs more or less can completely skew the results.
the best i can say is that sales slowly trend upwards whether i submit new images or not. results may be different with no submission for 6 months or more, but that's a riskier experiment
steve
3964
« on: February 25, 2011, 14:54 »
back in pre internet days of telecommunications, i worked with several groups that started as ad hoc lists and developed into useful organizations PNG graphics format began this way in usenet and compuserve discussions ESC - educational software coop from ESC site at http://edu-soft.org : ----------- The forums on CompuServe operated much the way newsgroups do now. People posted and replied to messages in threads. The forums were devoted to various topics, with subsections in each forum for different interests. In 1992, in CompuServe's Education Forum (EDFORUM), a group of software developers got together and started a somewhat informal group they dubbed the Educational Software Co-Operative. Andy Motes, author of the popular School Mom program, was the chief organizer. The group generated enough interest that it was granted its own section in EDFORUM. ------------ the other organization was the Assoc of Shareware Professionals http://www.asp-software.org/steve
3965
« on: February 25, 2011, 14:36 »
while i basically agree with the other comments about a 'links page', i'm willing to give it a try, so add me to the list: steve estvanik / cascoly software http://pix-now.com powered by smug mug i've developed and maintained my other web ventures for over 15 years, and can help with asp/vbasic, java, and SQL; i've got bandwidth on my sites to host a database for the immediate future. I concentrate on adventure travel, candid/editorial people & architecture details steve
3966
« on: February 01, 2011, 17:35 »
it's the reviewers that are unpredictable on SS - some dont know that editorial is not a synonym for newswoerthy - i just had a large batch rejected for npot newsworthy - looks like reviewer didnt even bother to look at most. many of these were similar to other images that other SS reviewers had accepted
3967
« on: January 31, 2011, 20:23 »
I've been facing variations on problem for over 30 years. First, with slides and classical stock agencies [often called rights managed, with examples like Corbis, and Getty]. I went thru multiple physical organizing systems - by shoot, by slideshow, by topic, etc, eventually settling on metal filing boxes for over 35,000 slides organized by category. I also kept a simple spreadsheet list of slide numbers and captions. Ive shot digital since 2001 and problems quickly multiplied with the greatly increased number of images that were now created. Most photographers arent computer programmers, but some computing oriented approaches are helpful. Rather than choose a software solution and force it to fit your needs, take some time to analyze what you currently have and what youd like to be able to do. At that point you can decide what sort of workflow system works best for you. Only then do you need to decide what actual software might be needed. http://cascoly.com/mssub1.asp
3968
« on: January 24, 2011, 13:49 »
>>>>20 dollars a month is a ridiculously low price to pay for your site being advertised, if i pay $20 to google, those ads go directly to my site - here i'm paying $20 / mo for ads that only go to my site x% of the time other than pricing, i'm interested in the concept and would be wiling to work on a communal project or continue the brainstorming. i have several 1and1 accounts with extra bandwidth that could be used for prototyping my website is http://pix-now.com run thru smugmug
3969
« on: January 06, 2011, 22:15 »
there's absolutely nothing unethical about selling the same product at different prices in different markets, esp'ly when the usage license varies. there MAY be business or other marketing reasons for not doing so, but variable pricing is part of any market system. you can buy the same items for half price at costco that you find at full price elsewhere.
i sell the same maps on ebay and amazon -- on ebay they bring about $2-3 each, on amazon people pay $10 or more. if they order direct from my website the price is cheaper.
3970
« on: December 23, 2010, 14:58 »
fwiw just found first usage of my stock on a russian news site http://generation.by/news3291.html [ google does a good translate of the page]
3971
« on: October 01, 2010, 17:58 »
on yesterday's Rachel Maddow, intersting use of istock photos by an anonymous group that's spent over $160K against Rep defazio of OR - their home page uses several istock images - shown in the video below, and doesnt reveal these are models, insteaad implying these are real supporters they showed tghe images on istock, but didnt mention the photographer's name steve http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#39449958
3972
« on: October 01, 2010, 17:44 »
i've had smugmug for about a year too, w same results - but after try ing red bubble, fine ARTS et i wasnt really expecting much income - those other sites ely mostly on internal views [ie, non buyers], so a smattering of sales over time
i do like smugmug - it's much easier to mange than Galerry2 which i had before. i use it as an online archive for other website and it does bring in a samll amt of adsense $. i've started submitting to hubpages and smugmug makes it really easy to add images to my writing
steve
3973
« on: September 28, 2010, 19:30 »
ive only upl'd 4 images to istock this year, since it takes so long to submit, AND their sales have been miserable compared to other agencies; for me IS consistently comes in 5 or lower
so i'm not bothering doing anything - if what's there sells, fine, i've already done the work. oddly, this month is about twice my monthly avg over the past year
steve
3974
« on: September 28, 2010, 19:25 »
there are some places where a tripod just isn't realistic. I've used a trek pod for several years http://www.pix-now.com/Travel/Peru shows our Andes trek where i used the monopod most of the time. we were limited in the total baggage weight we could bring for the 2 week trek, and since we would be camping at 14K' and going over 16K' passes many days, i didn't want to have it in my daypack. in addition, on a trip like this, you don't have the luxury of being able to deploy a tripod every time - it's hard work, and you need to keep moving to cover the distances needed. in addition, exertion at altitude doesn't make your handheld shots any steadier! so, for me, the monopod lets me reach places i otherwise would not see and still take acceptable images - my images from this trip are accepted & sell at all the major agencies, including alamy. another way i've used the monopod is on long car trips - where we need to cover 500 - 600 miles per day. these aren't photo days, but a monopod let's me stop quickly, get some pix and keep moving steve
3975
« on: September 24, 2010, 21:40 »
Hello,
I did a little more research on this, and it appears that the issue was our "Problem Keyword Alerts" and not an image rejection. We provide feedback to users when they've entered a keyword that we suspect will be problematic.
In this case, the keyword alert uses language that's not specific enough.
We're going to modify the language to:
Apple - Not allowed if isolated or artwork of Apple Inc. designed products. Apple Inc products are unacceptable for commercial use. Re-classify as editorial if newsworthy. Images of fruit (real apples) are acceptable.
As always - please flag these issues for Support, since they'll be able to track down the problem (and answer) quicker than the forums will.
Thanks!
Scott Product Manager Bigstock
you'll need to do more than check for apple -- your keyword alert keeps telling me i can't use the word 'newport' as in Newport, Oregon, you probably need a more generic explanation that makes it clear you're ONLY flagging an item if it refers to a trademarked product. luckily, we can just ignore the msg and the images are accepted, but it certainly can cause confusion steve
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|