|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - U11
51
« on: July 12, 2016, 12:32 »
52
« on: June 30, 2016, 15:27 »
here is my suggestions to SS  1) create /run a report which extract problematic image IDs per customer, it can be a heavy process from performance stand point but contributors cant do it from their side at all unless SS is expecting us to go through thousands of pictures one by one 2) make sure you(SS) validate the title field during submission/update 3) have a postmortem analysis around this Repeated Words communication failure
53
« on: June 28, 2016, 10:25 »
the email looks fishy (I also got it), I don't feel comfortable to load my official ID to the (wufoo.com ?!) site . Can I at least blur out the ID number to reduce a risk of fraud ?
They don't ask for your ID
so what Please provide a government issued photo ID with a valid expiration date, e.g. passport, driver’s license, state ID, Country ID card, etc.
means?
54
« on: June 28, 2016, 10:03 »
the email looks fishy (I also got it), I don't feel comfortable to load my official ID to the (wufoo.com ?!) site . Can I at least blur out the ID number to reduce a risk of fraud ?
55
« on: May 13, 2016, 13:00 »
Pond5 with more sales
56
« on: May 05, 2016, 14:36 »
Top 100 on shutter stock. Vast majority of vector and Illustrator Folks.
http://www.microstock.top/index.phtml?p=1
looks like those on top with hundreds thousands vectors are running some automated scripts on some limited subset of vectors creating different color/background duplicates
57
« on: April 01, 2016, 09:38 »
it will likely be a few months from now.
could you please also consider to support ability to migrate some existing RM editorial to RF editorial
58
« on: March 24, 2016, 11:25 »
they will become public domain some day but agencies will continue sell them
59
« on: March 24, 2016, 11:12 »
How many pictures FAA have?
Now i think that to get 1 cent from every subscriber is practically impossible
60
« on: March 24, 2016, 11:03 »
assuming some customer will stream only 1000 pictures a month and you will get all his money for your only picture he downloaded you'll end up with 1 cent.
Is my calculation too pessimistic?
61
« on: February 25, 2016, 16:29 »
62
« on: February 11, 2016, 16:02 »
logically speaking because your RM on alamy dont have to be exclusive (as per contract ), alamy suppose to contact you to verify if you've licensed the picture somewhere else before selling your picture with some exclusive rights
63
« on: January 25, 2016, 14:12 »
yes "Pixels" sounds very digital (i would say last century digital), where "fine art" is analog (for most of the people)
64
« on: January 23, 2016, 14:34 »
I'm struggling to see what the downside could be
VCG is Visual China Group and my experience with copyright enforcement in china is negative. I am also not very optimistic regarding business transparency
65
« on: January 22, 2016, 17:04 »
I am sick of these lies and corporate BS
lets wait for numbers, who knows 
66
« on: January 22, 2016, 14:16 »
I don't see anything about it on the getty artists forum but I did notice that the forum is a ghost town.
their forum is "private" and heavily moderated/restricted they learned a lesson during the Google drive unrest 
67
« on: January 22, 2016, 14:11 »
It is in the FAQ (see a link in a first message) What content will Getty Images represent after the transition?
GI will represent Corbis creative stills, Corbis Motion content, and Corbis archival and documentary content, inclusive of the prestigious Bettmann and Sygma archives, via the GettyImages.com website.
68
« on: January 22, 2016, 13:27 »
69
« on: January 06, 2016, 12:24 »
my advice is
answer honestly to yourself why you want to be in Stock Photography ?
and then think if Stock Photography is a right/effective/reliable way to achieve that
70
« on: December 30, 2015, 11:44 »
As I just posted in another thread - my last sale on Alamy netted me $3.50.
Getty sales bellow 1 dollar is not rare either
71
« on: December 10, 2015, 10:43 »
a bit more than 2000
72
« on: December 10, 2015, 10:17 »
I am calm, there's still time
74
« on: October 21, 2015, 22:07 »
the reviewer refused half of the files claiming that the image subject is too specific/niche oriented and that was not generic enough. The day after all I sold 5 timorese pictures. Don't really get the logic.
are those 5 sales justifying your and your reviewers effort financially?
How can you possibly answer that until the images have been on sale for a lot longer?
it is possible to answer my question (care to read it again?) it was about 5 sales which already happened. And my point is that those 5 sales are not a proof of guaranteed future sales.
75
« on: October 21, 2015, 07:56 »
the reviewer refused half of the files claiming that the image subject is too specific/niche oriented and that was not generic enough. The day after all I sold 5 timorese pictures. Don't really get the logic.
are those 5 sales justifying your and your reviewers effort financially?
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
