MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - skyfish
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18
51
« on: September 23, 2016, 09:23 »
I remember one photographer which after similar but accidental case stopped all stock activities. He was threatened to loose a day time job. In my case during interview for a contracting i was requested to shut down all online shops and portfolios. If for me it was a condition for future contract, for him it was a consequence of HR research about him.
52
« on: September 22, 2016, 02:05 »
I think it is different. By how it works. In this case it can be more controllable. And it is not only that you brought a photographer to the site then receive referral money. This is a common reference share as i understood. He wants to put in a ref program just every sale made by you or through your outlet, not only from photographer which you invitedto the site. Again brainshtorming on MSG...
53
« on: September 22, 2016, 01:46 »
Welcome new ideas, next - convince an investor. Anyway the old rule is to not keep all eggs in one basket. So why not something new?
54
« on: September 20, 2016, 01:46 »
Glitch? In my case all worked immediately. Try to contact support.
55
« on: September 20, 2016, 01:36 »
May be you sync your e-mails and after sometime try again?
56
« on: September 20, 2016, 01:15 »
Synced. Worked quickly. Uploaded one image to test the interface. First impression - interface ok but to update the order of keywords i would prefer to have a miltiline field with possibility to drag&drop keywords inside and to see all keywords in the same time. No scrolling, which takes a lot of time. This is for desktop, for mobile devices this part will depend from screen size of course. Anyway, and this too can be automated because you have statistics. User can update a little. Can be an optional function to be enabled/disabled by user. For now i gave up to drag/drop/scroll - it takes too much time. Categories - why not to give one default category? From Adobe or selected by user?
57
« on: September 20, 2016, 00:37 »
Good news! What about editorials? Finally?
58
« on: September 19, 2016, 08:09 »
For all time they accepted only few images with effects from me. I didn't like the type of images exactly which they accepted usually. I noticed that "practice" with only one type of images affects my work with clients and i found other ways to sell images and other images. Feeling myself more free. About effects usage - with ss i had always feeling that they defined a "niche" for everybody and attempt to do something different only creates rejections.
59
« on: September 18, 2016, 02:48 »
For now all "revolutionary" technologies or are on theoretical / working concept stage or can give something usable for web only. Greeting all new, i will keep DSLR for normal and big printable works. Clients prefer clean sharp images when they pay real money.
60
« on: September 15, 2016, 01:43 »
DT is alive, but their policy regarding model releases is strange and i take this case as personal, they do not accept any model release. All the years. Their reason is strange - nationalities and countries of model AND photographer should match (they didn't accept release given even at Yuri workshop in Aarhus - participants remember?). The same copy of release was accepted by all agencies and for other models no problems with releases. They don't sell good enough to do exclisive shots for them only.
61
« on: September 14, 2016, 23:58 »
BTW there is a commercial value. This photo is a perfect match for some blogs, i saw articles exactly related to collection of pieces of glass on beaches!
62
« on: September 13, 2016, 09:13 »
I always had thoughts that some agencies can be involved in regular leaking of highres photos. There can be some reasons.
63
« on: September 13, 2016, 08:05 »
Personally when I'm out shooting stock or on assignment I don't want some silly phones in camera or other stupid android hokus pokus. I dont even take a mobile with me. I don't want to be reached or disturbed let alone talk or make conversation. Just want to come back home with good shots.
but that's you , gyllens!!! we discussed this at our last family reunion only last week. my eldest was complaining how old she felt sitting in a bus or whatnot and be the only one not having her head stuck to a smartphone . she complains it's either ipod or giant cans before, and now it's a park full of kids doing whatyoucallit and grownup with smartphone waiting for an emal from a friend.
she says, why wait for a reply from that invisible friend when there are tons of lonely people sitting next to you or walking by you every single minute doing the same thing... waiting for an email from that invisible friend
the world has come to be infatuated by an invisible friend with a face shaped like a smartphone.
Mixed feeling. Here is the same, people prefer remote communication. Do they feel themselves more physically secure with online communication than with real one?
64
« on: September 13, 2016, 03:56 »
Voted + for PixelBytes, even it is a hard way when it is not just ad hoc expressions
65
« on: September 13, 2016, 03:03 »
The dream for consumers it is to have from a small piece results of DSLR quality, with which they can play after, or use directly. It is not there yet, but will come. And many physical limitations of a small piece will keep market of DSLR alive very long time more, but shrinked. And current smartphones are very good often because user will never see at 100% on his screen. Small prints hide the problems too. Anyway i will not risk to shoot wedding with a smartphone, but often provide such photos additionally if quality is acceptable.
66
« on: September 13, 2016, 02:46 »
Don't forget about contract. They or you are clients first of all. I include in contract even level of retouching, because for every wedding complexity of work is different. Nobody is perfect, but clients want "enhanced reality". We do our best, and happy smile has its value, for sure. Price is always calculated as "tailor-made service", and proposed packages serve only for general orientation. Every case is different. Conditions from client are different too, and there should be a balance, protecting both sides. Example: request to shoot video non-stop during several hours is something what should not be requested if you want to hire just one person for affordable reportage.
67
« on: September 12, 2016, 01:50 »
Agencies and contributors have different "meaning of life". After that everything is predictable.
68
« on: September 05, 2016, 10:03 »
Just i can guess that in their search query (the real one on backend) there are some conditions in code, then the result is sorted according to these conditions and presented to viewers (and viewers can be selected too - by any condition, location, company/partner etc). Some companies generate false views/reads of records with help of bots or hired followers, with different geographical locations. Anyway we cannot see exactly their kitchen to proof something. May be these are really good images
69
« on: September 05, 2016, 03:54 »
Views and likes are not bad things but useless for pocket :-)
70
« on: August 31, 2016, 13:13 »
I received, but for now have nothing to tell
71
« on: August 23, 2016, 11:06 »
Some days ago discovered that ss does not allow anymore to change (make lower) payout sum, and demand to contact support. Contacted. Still no answer. Probably they wait for end of month.
72
« on: August 22, 2016, 05:32 »
It is down in Belgium
73
« on: August 21, 2016, 14:14 »
Do you get any compensation for lost sales, or is it just a case of banning the infringer?
you never get any cash, the agency just pockets the cash they earn from your stolen work as far as I know.
So why they will be interested to close ingringer's account quickly?
74
« on: August 11, 2016, 11:12 »
Thank you for finding. The file in question started to return from first days in other places, it is better to delete than keep it in free section. Other files are not sold so active, but anyway, nothing to expect from these files for me at FT
75
« on: August 11, 2016, 06:04 »
FYI - it is warning for all to check, and i repeat - i didn't click that option to change, it was "no" when i sent the file. Fact that there is probability 0 may be ok, but contributor only should decide to give something for free or not. If you rent your apartment using service of agency and they let it for somebody for free will you be ok with that? Sure no. No subject for discussion.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|