MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - rjmiz
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 29
501
« on: February 06, 2008, 18:23 »
I literally use about 10 distinct and different methods for isolations in photoshop. Those are just 10 I use. There are about 10 more that I don't use.
The best, The MIZ
502
« on: February 06, 2008, 18:17 »
I often ponder these thoughts:
1. When reviewers do their reviewing, do they do it on a calibrated monitor?
2. Do they examine images at 100%.... or do they go even further to 150, and even 200%? (where artifacts will surely start to form at that resolution)
3. Are reviewers diligent enough to keep their monitors cleaned on a daily basis where there will be no confusing a mark on the screen with an artifact?
4. Am I being too paranoid, or is it really true the reviewers hate me?
Best to you, The MIZ
503
« on: February 06, 2008, 13:03 »
Photoshop Tutorial - for Beginners and Intermediate UsersThis technique is very popular and used often in Apple's advertisements. It's a very EZ method and only takes like 3 or 4 steps or so. You'll be amazed at your accomplishment and sit there wondering why you never attempted this before! Enjoy and post any comments you have here http://www.microstockpix.com/forum/reflect/reflect.html
504
« on: February 04, 2008, 08:59 »
"Why is it that every monkey who buys a camera thinks they are a photographer? "
Monkey? Please explain. It's always been my contention anyone shooting a camera is a photographer. I mean what else would you call them? When I drive my car I'm a driver. When I swing a golf club I'm a golfer.
When I criticize orher people...I'm an *
Be well, The MIZ
505
« on: February 03, 2008, 15:08 »
Please allow me to clarify my claim "That overexposed" Images are easier to post process.
It's my fault for assuming the reader would know that any highlights that are clipped, or gone to pure white (255) are NOT recoverable. I assumed the reader would know that ALL information in that portion of the image is lost forever and can never be recovered.
I was referring to over exposed, where information in the image would still there. Photoshop can only work with information that is still contained inside the image.
I apologize for not making that clearer.
Best regards to you, The MIZ
506
« on: February 02, 2008, 18:37 »
I have to smile sometimes when people refer to noise in a photograph. Back in the days when I was in the high school photo club, we used to call it "GRAIN".
With the onset of digital imagery we now refer to it as noise, and as though it were a bad thing. Well thats not always the case in the fine art photography circle. (which by the way, is my REAL passion)
As far as my experience goes with noise, I virtually have none. My camera is a Canon 1Ds Mark II and rarely if ever, produces any noise. I never shoot above 400 ISO, and I tend to OVER expose rather than under expose my images.
It's a known fact in the post processing end of this hobby, that over exposed images are easier to recover and make salvageable ; The same does not hold true for underexposed, and/or backlit subjects.
Sorry I could be of little help. Good luck with your work, The MIZ
507
« on: February 02, 2008, 03:14 »
I have. Its on my website. In order not to spam this forum, I limit my tutorials to only 1 per week. I really don't think anyone would appreciate my jamming up this forum with my clutter. Perhaps next week.
The best to you, and your weekend, The MIZ
508
« on: February 02, 2008, 03:07 »
Are you referring to "Blend if"
509
« on: February 01, 2008, 19:20 »
Noise will happen on occasion, but thats if you use curves or levels to make adjustments. With this method, it either works or it don't. There is no in between. By deploying a screen blend to a layer in itself does not produce noise per se. The problem can be created by many factors ISO, small camera sensor, poor exposure etc.
Thats why I developed this technique. A bit less noise results (not much though). I use Neat Image Plug-in for heavy duty noise. Problems with noise usually occur in situations where you have "Underexposed" an image, and are attempting to brighten the underexposed potions of that image. Most methods I have seen in the past use curves or levels.
There is another option to consider here to. That would be the Shadow/Highlight adjustment found under "Image>Adjustments>Shadow/Highlights." in Photoshop.
I hope this helps. Be well and have some fun this weekend, The MIZ
PS I would also like to mention that I lean towards Over exposure rather than under, simply because of the noise you mentioned about. It's been my experience that I have less problems adjusting images that are "Over exposed" rather than the other way around.
510
« on: February 01, 2008, 19:09 »
I want to humbly thank those who support my ideology. My only real motive to posting here in this great forum, is to help others, and have an occasional laugh once in a while.
Some of you see it the way, as were my intentions all along.
Many thanks to you. The MIZ
512
« on: January 31, 2008, 07:21 »
If I may please:
I have been using Photoshop now for 10 years. I don't expect anyone to dare think that I am an expert at this. All my tutorials are techniques I have developed all along my learning process.
NOT any one of them are copied or plagiarized. I simply developed these techniques by reading and watching tutorials myself in my 10 years.
I make no qualms about promoting my site, yes I do. However, it is NOT a Microstock related forum. Instead it is targeted strictly as a Fine Art photography site, and photoshop tutorials. It is not a commercial site, it is privately owned and operated by myself. It is a rather small collection of members....maybe 50 I think, no more
I did not believe my site would conflict with this forum simply because this site is apples, and mine is oranges. I did not intend to cause a ruckus or upset this forum. For that I apologize.
I will therefore desist posting tutorials, and lay low.
I am truly sorry if I offended anyone at all. The MIZ
513
« on: January 30, 2008, 11:39 »
Ok, I'm not gonna argue. Thanks for your feed back.
Bye, The MIZ
514
« on: January 30, 2008, 06:06 »
Gee you sound as though you don't like me very much. Especially after your rude remarks to me. This is the second time.
If you don't like me please just don't read my posts here. Move on with your negative attitude, I really don't appreciate it, or you.
Thanks for your unkind words to me, The MIZ
515
« on: January 29, 2008, 23:21 »
Contakt, I think your making a mistake. DT is a professional, and reputable business. It strives to keep it's professional edge at all costs.
What I hear you doing is "Projecting" the worse case scenario your mind can conjure up. Relax and take a deep breath. Gather your thoughts, and rethink what you just posted.
Contact support at DT. But don't go in "heavy handed" as you did here. Be pleasant, and inquirer about their polices regarding disabled images. Then come back here and tell us all what you found out.
Be well my friend and the best to you, The MIZ
516
« on: January 29, 2008, 23:00 »
Some of you know me, and perhaps some newbies who were not around last Winter don't. I usually am absent from this forum 9 months out of the 12. The reason being I'm out shooting Landscapes in the Spring, Summer, and Fall. I do not upload to stock sites 9 months out of the year. So where am I going with this post? Be patient and I will give you some of my "Super Secret Photoshop Tips" for FREE. Most of my tutorials are produced during the 9 months I'm absent from stock sites. So I want to share with all my good friends here in Microstockgroup some of the "tuts" I produced this Summer. I'll start with this one, and please bear in mind that I am more than willing to help anyone along with this hobby. Enjoy and be well, The MIZ http://microstockpix.com/forum/pt6/pt6.html
517
« on: January 29, 2008, 21:51 »
ahemmm...why that would be... http://www.microstockpix.com/I can't understand even why you needed to ask that question. Be well my fiend, The MIZ
518
« on: January 29, 2008, 18:36 »
what?! Is this about making money or your love and ability to create images?
They said this would happen, everything good in my life would soon be capitalized on, and made commercial. (I just recently found out that the tooth Fairy were my parents. I'm devastated)
Be well, and make a lot of money if that's what floats your boat, The MIZ
519
« on: January 29, 2008, 12:56 »
One little note that you may find useful is:
In the tutorial I used the History Brush set to darken "Darken". If you have any dark spots on a light background you would like to remove, simply set the History Brush to "Lighten". This will eradicate any dark spots on a light surface like perhaps dust on your sensor.
Enjoy life, The MIZ
520
« on: January 29, 2008, 01:33 »
Anyka, If dust is a problem for you in your images, I have a simple solution. Here is a tutorials of mine I did some time ago about getting rid of dust in your images. I hope you find it helpful. I have like 65 or more quick tutorials that are avaiable on my site. Here's the link for the dust. http://microstockpix.com/forum/dust/dust.htmlBe good to yourself, The MIZ
521
« on: January 28, 2008, 18:11 »
Sorry but it changes just about everyday...so that would be an annoyance to the readers of this forum. Besides, their busy working on their images. heheheeh
Always do your best, The MIZ
522
« on: January 28, 2008, 15:43 »
PLEASE NOTE
My links in this post may not work correctly now as I have updated my images
523
« on: January 27, 2008, 13:20 »
Anyka, Here are the answers to the questions you ask. Please do not hesitate to ask again if I do not fully explain the process to the point you understand. It is most important that I make clear to you the process so that you too can begin to do the same things I do. how much is photo, and how much is photoshop? On rare occasions I will do an entire image in PS. 95% of the time Its a mixture. Below are examples of 100% photoshop (PS) http://www.microstockpix.com/pages/hat.htm http://www.microstockpix.com/pages/feb%2014.htmAnd theses below are a mixture http://www.microstockpix.com/pages/concepts.htm http://www.microstockpix.com/pages/deal%20in%20a%20box.htmIn the images above with the books; the books are real, but the titles are photoshoped the mouse and monitor are real, but the planet, and the graph on the monitor are PS. The image with hands shaking; The hands are real, the suit sleeves they are wearing were created by me in PS. Originally the pics of the hands were two friends in my kitchen wearing short sleeves. The money is real but manipulated in PS, the building in the background was taken of my bank out of my car window in the parking lot. The plastic case is a case that held a USB hub I recently purchased at Best Buy. It's interesting to note that the hands shaking, appear in over 35 images I have created in the last 2 1/2 years. The plastic case was used over and over for about 20 images submitted in the last 2 weeks. ....but the roses on the red background are a real reflection? NO! every image you see on that page with reflections are FAKE. PS again. If you you would like to know the secrets of the reflections I will demonstrate it to privbately if you ask. The process would be to lenghty to explain here. But I can tell you it's not just a matter of inverting a copy the image....no no, that would not work for any of those images because all the images have corners that angle away if just inverted. Another words you must "SKEW" the reflections in order for them to look natural. Here is a diagram demonstrating what I mean  If I may be of any further assistance . I'm just an email away. Please don't hesitate to ask for advice or help. I live to help others, I love doing as much as I do creating the images. Be well my friend, The MIZ
524
« on: January 26, 2008, 21:00 »
Would you read this same book on microstock 20 times?That's the title of this thread. the reason is to drive home a point I have been advocating for some time. Well, the truth is I would not read the same book, or watch the same movie for that matter more than once. BUT!...what if every time you read the book, or watched the movie, and I told you it would change every time. Would you do it? ...maybe? Maybe some of the story lines would sound or look familiar, but it was definitely different every time. So follow me with this thought it mind. What if, I told you could upload the same image to any stock site, 5 times or more and every time you uploaded the image it was different...but still familiar. Well, this is a concept I first put into practice about 2 years ago on Shutterstock. What I'm about to show you are 8 basic images that have managed to turn into 63, thats Sixty Three images, all different but all VERY, very familiar. So here they are all 63 that were conceived only by 8 images. Judge for yourself. http://www.microstockpix.com/Now don't be perplexed, confused, or start saying "but I can't do that"....because YOU CAN! it's not difficult, and if you need any help at all in getting started, I would be more than happy to help you on your way to get started. Since I am retired, I would welcome anyone at all seeking advice or help in your attempt to follow along. The biggest hurdle is maybe the first 2 or 3 images, but after that you start to get the hang of it and the image ideas just start coming naturally. Be well and live well. The MIZ
525
« on: January 22, 2008, 13:02 »
Well, Its not exactly a tutorial like most of you are used to me making, but it's rather a demonstration of a new FREE plug-in I discovered for photoshop. This plug-in produces "clean results" in my demonstration video. Have fun and if you would like a copy of the plugin, or the video please feel free to use it for any benevolent reasons you may have. Email for download instruction Here is the link http://www.microstockpix.com/laundry/
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 29
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|