501
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS Announces Commission Increase for May 2008
« on: April 30, 2008, 15:47 »
when's this announcement coming? i wanna know what i'm getting paid

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 501
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS Announces Commission Increase for May 2008« on: April 30, 2008, 15:47 »
when's this announcement coming? i wanna know what i'm getting paid
![]() 502
Cutcaster / Re: Cutcaster« on: April 29, 2008, 15:44 »
oh no, not another - dum dum dum
My vote: 3 LuckyOlivers against it ![]() 503
General Stock Discussion / Re: Time to spend cash« on: April 24, 2008, 22:13 »
I read about the better beamer. Was looking into it as well. The initial investment just keeps on growing (and I realize that this lens won't be much good for stock so the return on it financially might not be very good - however its a personal choice)
504
General Stock Discussion / Time to spend cash« on: April 23, 2008, 12:39 »
So, its that time of year for me to go out and spend some serious cash on equipment I probably should be getting, but here is the initial list that I am going to order:
Canon Telephoto EF 500mm f/4.0L IS (Image Stabilizer) USM Autofocus Lens Wimberley Gimbal Type Tripod Head II - with Arca Swiss-Type Quick Release Base (Requires Plate) Wimberley P40 Arca-Type Quick Release Plate for Telephoto Lenses - 5.9" (150mm) Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Autofocus Lens Hoya 58mm Ultraviolet UV(0) Haze Multi-Coated Glass Filter Canon EF 1.4x II Extender Canon 2x II Extender EF - Autofocus Case Logic SLRC-4 SLR/Computer Backpack - for Photo or Digital SLR Outfit with a 15.4" Laptop Computer, plus accessories Now, I have to ask those who use such materials whether they believe that the Canon 2x II is worth it. As well, I currently own a 100-400L but is the 500mm that much better for wildlife and sports The 500mm will obviously be limited for stock and such but my passion is wildlife - especially birds - so thats why I want it. I also own a 30D so I will lose autofocus with that lens (planning on a 5D MK II upgrade) I'm thinking of dropping the 50mm f/1.4 and the 2x until then Any suggestions? 505
Dreamstime.com / Re: Additional Format« on: April 23, 2008, 11:51 »
thanks, i think i'll just go outside and enjoy the weather before smog ruins that :p
506
Dreamstime.com / Re: Additional Format« on: April 23, 2008, 11:48 »
For the dollar they want to pay, I can tell them where to go.
Pay 50 bucks or something for an extended license, and you can have that raw file - ![]() I'm not in a very good mood today lol 507
Dreamstime.com / Re: The DT contests« on: April 23, 2008, 11:46 »
Sure:
http://www.dreamstime.com/the-sporting-life_winners-44 the first three are winners - two of which I've already stated I strongly disagree with Just peruse through and I believe most will disagree with the picks 508
Dreamstime.com / The DT contests« on: April 23, 2008, 11:20 »
I don't know who votes on these things but seriously, only the bike rider should have gotten a top-three for this sports theme. And the ratings for others were terrible - there's a photo of a kid playing hockey that looks dark and the composition is also nothing exciting, yet it got a higher rating than mine from what I can see (also hockey - but has action and such)
Am I bitter? Kind of. Why? Not because I thought I should win, but because this particular contest had so much potential (and some people did have great shots) to bring out great sports shots but instead was brought to some stupid poses and terrible sports ideas (two of which won) That is my rant - if I offended on of the two people who won that didn't take the bike photo, sorry, but I'm calling it like I see it, so too bad 509
General Stock Discussion / Re: Get over rejection and then... BIG 5 are cheating us!!!« on: April 17, 2008, 13:50 »file him under the category of crap disturber. Yes I'm the CEO of all the sites. I usually take a magic marker and draw facial hair when I make public appearances to stay in cognito. 510
General Stock Discussion / Re: Who`s Next??????« on: April 17, 2008, 12:25 »
Canstockphoto
MostPhotos Albumo Zymmetrical PantherMedia ScanStockPhoto YayMicro VectorStock MicrostockPhoto Fotomind ImageCatalogue StockPhotoMedia Geckostock ImageVortex USphotoStock Regimages Thephotostorage Paxxion Photola moodboard Order is irrelevant. Only 20% will survive (at most) - I pick YAYMICRO because its got the dumbest name 511
General Stock Discussion / Re: Get over rejection and then... BIG 5 are cheating us!!!« on: April 17, 2008, 12:18 »
file him under the category of crap disturber.
no good can come from this thread other than "justice" gets banned.... ....and "justice" for all? 512
General Stock Discussion / Re: Get over rejection and then... BIG 5 are cheating us!!!« on: April 17, 2008, 11:13 »
who is this guy? seriously
513
Mostphotos.com / Re: My assesment of "Most Photos" after my first month.« on: April 16, 2008, 14:12 »
It's the latest version of LO syndrome. Not wasting my time...
Just a thought though, I'm not creative with names, but can't someone who's trying to come up with a stock site come up with a decent name. "MOSTPHOTOS"?! I'm boycotting because of the name ![]() 514
LuckyOliver.com / Re: NEWS - Closing the Doors« on: April 15, 2008, 19:00 »
Classy guys, but seriously people - look - just take a look when someone says "NEW STOCK PHOTO SITE"
If guys with class and what seemed to be a good idea couldn't make it work for most, why would you submit to a site just pops up saying "we're awesome, we pay you 70% of Zero" Wake-up call for those who are always positive about rando-startups. I feel sorry for Bryan, he did a good job of communicating with us and put together what seems to be a good site. I have 108 credits if anyone is close. If someone wants to "buy" an extended license of my pics, I'll be pretty happy too ![]() Thanks Bryan for all your efforts. Good luck in the future --hopefully you read this 515
New Sites - General / Re: StockRiot« on: April 11, 2008, 13:26 »
another site? when will it end? seriously...such a waste of time
516
Albumo.com / Re: Closing Account @ Albumo« on: April 11, 2008, 09:16 »
This is the reason why I do not join sites that are not established and not backed by huge corporations that are proven. I still haven't joined Snapvillage because they don't have FTP that I can see.
I make enough money between SS, IS, DT, FT, BS that I don't need to waste time looking for pennies at third-rate websites. LO is joining that, the fact they lowered the payout to $25 is really nice though, so now I may get a payout a year (only had one payout ever at $115) Stick to what works, the effort it takes to track all these sites isn't worth it 90% of the time. 517
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia rejects for similar photograph« on: April 06, 2008, 12:17 »
Fotolia review is crap. Period. They don't explain anything and when you e-mail them for an answer, they give you more censored generic crap. Pardon my language. I am just enraged with that site because it used to be my 3rd best earning site, now its falling out of the top 5.
Crap. Again, I'm a bit angrier than normal. But still - stupid rejections happen all the time there. Maybe its me though - maybe for 2 years I've been producing technically inferior photos that reviewers at iStock and Shutterstock just don't see. Hoo-ra for better agencies. That is my rant. 518
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Newbie HELP -What's a good lens to start with? Finally purchased my first DSLR« on: March 31, 2008, 09:37 »
600mm f/4 IS
![]() Don't be cheap when it comes to lenses. LIke you said, you will get it back. The 17-40 f/4 is fantastic, and its not that expensive. And you really don't need IS anyways. PS - beware of 14 dollar batteries. Might not be a good idea 519
Computer Hardware / Re: How to speed up Photosohop« on: March 28, 2008, 10:34 »I built a computer specifically for that - kept freezing at first because stupid BIOS was set to look for SLI and all my memory slots are filled with RAM.Very good machine. A hardcore one Its great. No problems anymore. Only cost 1000 dollars cdn 520
Computer Hardware / Re: How to speed up Photosohop« on: March 28, 2008, 09:22 »
I built a computer specifically for that - kept freezing at first because stupid BIOS was set to look for SLI and all my memory slots are filled with RAM.
Duocore 2.33 GHz 1333 MHz FSB 4GB of RAM DDR2 800 Was using Vista, now back to XP for reliability Photoshop CS3 Bridge CS3 XFXforce 680i SLI LT motherboard GeForce 8500GT DVI for the monitor 3 hdd's - 160 for programs and the operating system, 300 and 400 GB for the storage of files. Works like a dream now that I ironed out the bugs. 521
Shutterstock.com / Re: Frustrating rejections again at Shutterstock« on: March 27, 2008, 08:40 »
NOthing has changed. Woke up this morning to find 28 out of 30 rejected for "Composition" and "Poor lighting" meanwhile I have other photos with similar "composition" that are getting downloads daily and I have photos of a goalie playing hockey in which I can't control the lighting and the lighting is perfectly fine. Here is an example at DT:
http://www.dreamstime.com/hockey-goaltender-image4079577 EDIT: Its stupid crap like this that makes me want to go exclusive at IS. In the end I hope that these companies get what they deserve for hiring idiots or trying to save money by using machines. That said, I know that SS has been good in the past so I hope they return to that level - but given the recent events, it just seems to get worse. 522
Shutterstock.com / Re: Frustrating rejections again at Shutterstock« on: March 26, 2008, 09:38 »
Lack of controls over reviewers are really annoying for everyone. Thats why if I feel a photo is good enough I will reupload it until it gets through and it usually does (especially if other sites accept it first try).
Worked a bunch of times and now I have great sellers because of it 523
General Stock Discussion / Re: Canon XT vs. Canon XTi.« on: March 25, 2008, 08:19 »
Used an XT for over a year. Then jumped to 30D and now moving towards MKiii, but XT is a good camera at ISO 200 and lower if you don't have the money to spend. Just be prepared that sometimes you will need to spend time to fix certain areas of photos.
Not everyone can afford Nikon D3's like Rinder, but you can improve photoshop skills to compensate a little. 524
Yaymicro / Re: yaymicro - new microstock site« on: March 25, 2008, 08:16 »Yap and I'd wish you would have kept it private for a while like all other people did here. You know what kills Yaymicro? "Yaymicro" - Thats just as bad a name as "Snapvillage" and/or "LuckyOliver". 80/20 rule. 80% of your revenue will come from 20% of the sites (if not now, but eventually) - your time to upload to the remaining 80% isn't worth that 20% - 525
Adobe Stock / Re: Just not worth the effort (for me, anyways)« on: March 24, 2008, 17:24 »
Got a few responses back from my questions and they don't answer questions very well, if at all. They just paste their generic crap (same answer in two different responses) and don't give a crap about what you are saying.
So...I will stop uploading, leave whatever files I have and that will be my way of telling them where to go - I'd rather not deal with robots ![]() |
|