551
Adobe Stock / Re: Keyword sorting tool update
« on: June 12, 2015, 14:03 »
Yes catagories are a PITA esp when you have sub and sub sub catagories
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 551
Adobe Stock / Re: Keyword sorting tool update« on: June 12, 2015, 14:03 »
Yes catagories are a PITA esp when you have sub and sub sub catagories
552
Dreamstime.com / Re: Do you believe that DT is dying?« on: June 11, 2015, 10:08 »
they should really lower their payout threshold to $50
it would be in line withother agencies esp seeing they dont have volume sales 553
Canon / Re: Is the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens a sharp lens?« on: May 24, 2015, 11:30 »Nope. Edges are too blurry, unsharp depending on focal length, etc. generally not a good choice. There are better ones for the same or less money out there.Could you please enumerate them? I am looking also to buy this lens just because I've heard that is sharp. Or if this lens is sharp then which range? Quite a good lens If people are dissatisfied, they either have a bad copy of the lens or are Nikonians lol You can always rent a lens and see for yourself The praise versus discontent with this lens is heavily weighted on the praise side of the scale People say this and that, best to see for yourself as stated. 554
Canon / Re: Is the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens a sharp lens?« on: May 20, 2015, 13:00 »
It is a very good walk around lens
Probably my most used lens Its versatile and a nice range for all purpose lens, i use it on a 5d m2 Like almost all zooms they are weaker technically at the ends i.e. 24 and 100 mm just because of the nature of the construction of any zoom, but it is a fine lens one that i wouldnt hesitate to recommend 555
Shutterstock.com / Re: Buying tips for Contributor on SS« on: May 19, 2015, 21:50 »
#1 - yes you need to open a seperate buyers acct
#2- you may want to ask ss about this via email 557
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Review Times« on: May 17, 2015, 19:28 »Yesterday I had some reviewed from 29 March so yours should be done soon. I don't think that many people lose much money by a week extra in review at canstock. The problem is my batch is closing in on a month for review Waiting sucks 558
Symbiostock - General / Re: Symbiostock Trademark owner Robin Murarka« on: May 15, 2015, 21:50 »
Does anyone think that Leo has to some extent be culpable for this?
after all he must have agreed to some deal with Robyn - whether that was for a monetary gain or otherwise. this whole thing seems like a big convoluted mess... i still have my legacy site, it functions, but its a far cry from what we were all led to beleive it would become - and hoped it would become. 559
General Stock Discussion / Re: Strategies for Free Usage Requests?« on: May 11, 2015, 20:20 »
that is priceless
i too would rather take a more genteel approach, but in this case he had already done work for free ,so he had it coming 560
123RF / Re: Is the site down?« on: May 09, 2015, 12:42 »
Uploaded a batch then when i go to process it takes me to login page when i login it puts me back to upload page
Cant process my omages. ![]() 562
Photography Equipment / Re: Need some advice for Lens Hood for Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens« on: May 08, 2015, 10:32 »The first one looks to deep for a 24 mm end of the lens Ah, i see 563
Photography Equipment / Re: Need some advice for Lens Hood for Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens« on: May 08, 2015, 09:55 »
The first one looks to deep for a 24 mm end of the lens
564
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Reports First Quarter 2015 Financial Results« on: May 07, 2015, 07:32 »
No payment yet hopefully today although they technically have intil the 15th
565
Shutterstock.com / Re: Oringer gets $28 million grant« on: May 02, 2015, 14:29 »
I would like to know what mcro pays $10 royalty?
566
General - Stock Video / Re: SS footage sales -- what's going on?« on: May 01, 2015, 15:34 »
I dont sell alot of footage but my last clip got me $96 which was a very pleasant surprise, since i didnt know you could get that ,uch
567
Shutterstock.com / Re: Oringer gets $28 million grant« on: April 30, 2015, 17:53 »
hire some competant reviewers!
568
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Reviewers Beating Me Up.... Anyone Else?« on: April 30, 2015, 05:27 »
Reviews have become a frustrating , unfair, and unpredictable
569
123RF / Re: Completely Broken« on: April 29, 2015, 08:53 »
My last 2 batches uploaded never showed up in pending or anywhere else, i had to email them and then they were processed
So something is messed up 570
Selling Stock Direct / Re: Any sales on Zenfolio?« on: April 27, 2015, 11:31 »
Why does this guy get a minus 1
Hes only asking a question? 571
Canva / Re: Question for Lee@Canva - What are your image requirements and policies?« on: April 24, 2015, 06:09 »
What?! Lol 572
General Photography Discussion / Re: What is this antique agricultural machine called?« on: April 04, 2015, 21:10 »
Prototype rickshaw
573
General Stock Discussion / Re: $250 for Nike wearing logo pix« on: April 03, 2015, 21:12 »Whats wrong with that? You are selling for $19.99Custom photography they want to pitch to Nike for $250. Sigh. ummm, no, not really I dont have any model released fit athletes in action with Nike product in the shot that I'm selling as an unlimited royalty- free license in my porfolio ![]() 574
General Stock Discussion / Re: $250 for Nike wearing logo pix« on: April 03, 2015, 16:58 »Custom photography they want to pitch to Nike for $250. Sigh. And how many will be falling over themselves to submit in hopes of getting $250? 575
Dissolve / Re: Introducing Dissolve« on: March 29, 2015, 18:11 »
No further response from them on these issues...
I guess when you don't say anything, your actually saying a whole lot Adios muchacho |
Submit Your Vote
|