MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Red Dove
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 31
551
« on: July 26, 2013, 09:30 »
Almost there...let us hope IS will learn from this shambolic episode and execute our July PP in a swift and efficient manner. I am an optimist, it has to be said....but I've also been kown to wander down to the local pond and throw bread to imaginary ducks.
552
« on: July 25, 2013, 06:13 »
Rather her than me. Anyway, the To Do List (which is of course subject to change as is the person in the GM role)
- Return my sales revenue to at least 2012 levels - Drag the PP program and your IT infrastructure into the 21st century - Overhaul your donkey of an uploading/keywording process - Teach your minions to engage with the community in a civilised/professional manner - Treat us like the shareholders we are as opposed to dimwitted peasants - Make Lobo your footstool - Stop fiddling with the collection. It is what it is and customers pay for the image that suits their purpose/needs irrespective of whether an exclusive made it or an editor thinks its nicer than everyone else's. - Build up a Vodka stash in the filing cabinet. You're going to need it
Feel free to add further imperatives as you wish.
553
« on: July 22, 2013, 14:54 »
My total earnings in three years at MP are less than I made on SS this Sunday.
Still, its nice that they finally got around to writing to you.
554
« on: July 22, 2013, 13:42 »
^^ The "solution" is probably vodka.
555
« on: July 21, 2013, 13:30 »
Is there a boardwalk or a pier? You could have the Model facing the camera with the sea and sunset behind her and the model looking like Edvard Munch's "The Scream"
556
« on: July 21, 2013, 08:23 »
Cliche stuff but how about:
- happy model waving out to sea in anticipation of her husband returning with a trawler full of whelks (or unhappy model waving out to sea as her viking husband returns with a longship full of women and beer)
- model skipping barefoot through the surf, although it would be better if she was on a white horse.
- model drawing words of love in the sand with a big stick
- model eating a really big ice cream whilst fighting off attacking seagulls
557
« on: July 21, 2013, 08:01 »
I wouldn't worry about it - maintenance might mean a bit of dusting or simply retrieving the IT Director's wig from behind the main server.
Of course, for some here and on the SS forums it might mean anything from a search tweak to improve or destroy their numbers to a complete overhaul of the matrix and therefore a redefining of reality as we know it.
558
« on: July 21, 2013, 07:55 »
The editors should have gone to Specsavers.
559
« on: July 21, 2013, 07:50 »
I remain appalled and quite frankly astonished that nobody senior to their fool of a "moderator" has bothered to acknowledge or reassure the people who pay their wages that this is of serious concern and is rightly very high on, or at the top of their to do list.
When it comes to working and communicating with their shareholders* I can't decide whether Istockphoto are arrogant, naive or just a bunch of dim bulbs.
* If you consider our portfolios as an asset and contribution to their success.
It's reminiscent of some situations I've been in, particularly with acquisition situations. "Worker bees" are not authorized to make decisions, issue statements or express opinions. New "consultants" and middle & upper management comes in. Meetings increase but action items are few and far between. Lots of discussion without any real activity. No real master plan and those in lower level positions are left wondering what they are allowed to do or say, policy changes are not well communicated internally, lots of confusion and many are just trying to stay under the radar to keep a paycheck coming in.
You're bang on there Bear....that is until by some quirk of fate a good thing happens - at which point there is a general stampede to claim the credit for it. I believe this is called a meritocracy. Looks like 40-50% of May has come in - no doubt someone at IS will try to sell this as a success and ask for a pay increase at their next performance review. Bleeuuucchh.
560
« on: July 20, 2013, 13:19 »
I remain appalled and quite frankly astonished that nobody senior to their fool of a "moderator" has bothered to acknowledge or reassure the people who pay their wages that this is of serious concern and is rightly very high on, or at the top of their to do list.
When it comes to working and communicating with their shareholders* I can't decide whether Istockphoto are arrogant, naive or just a bunch of dim bulbs.
* If you consider our portfolios as an asset and contribution to their success.
561
« on: July 18, 2013, 13:57 »
I posted this on June 12 in the iStock PP forum, got banned quickly thereafter and later the post was deleted.
I have a buddy that works in IT at iStock and he told me that iStock cut the banana rations of the monkeys who key in the PP data and the monkeys went completely bananas!! (pun intended) The monkeys are essentially rioting, destroying equipment and throwing feces all over the place. Total disaster.
Yes but this is an insult to our hairy relatives since given enough monkeys there is a good chance the problem would be fixed in a couple of hundred years, whereas the humans at IS will never get it done.
The fact IS still haven't fixed a simple problem speaks volumes about the condition and maintenance of their IT infrastructure and makes me wonder whether the PP has EVER been correctly calculated and paid out.
562
« on: July 17, 2013, 11:01 »
If you get a response to a comment in the PP forum its either a meaningless platitude at best or scorn and derision at worst. I wrote to Contributor Relations....three days ago....No reply as yet although I see someone has posted a vacuous response in the PP forum.
IS' attitude seems to be "send us an e-mail or comment in the forum and we'll ignore it later". As for being "escalated up the chain" what does that mean? On the basis a large swathe of your suppliers have not been paid for services rendered it ought to be the first thing on Ellen Desmarais' To Do List now that other important stuff like who makes her coffee, where is her parking space and the location of the staff canteen have been dealt with.
563
« on: July 17, 2013, 10:12 »
There are kids out there with buck teeth and flat foreheads who do a better job running their ant farms.
The complexity involved with having to deal with them either as a buyer or a contributor is a weakness that IS have tried to sell as diversity and exclusivity. The recent "simplification" of their collection into main and other spurious strata, plus the price drop feels like a continuation of a knee-jerk strategy and is not a game changer IMO. If it doesn't work I forsee the break up of the collection altogether into new agencies grouped around exclusives, indies and perhaps a higher tier collection based on the old Vetta - parts of which GI will keep or sell off as they see fit.
I forgot to add, in line with other comments, I don't think exclusivity has been a big selling point for buyers for some years now.
564
« on: July 16, 2013, 03:35 »
Maybe the IT chappies* should stop watching endless re-runs of "The Big Bang Theory" and read more books about computer bits and bobs. Or they should buy some new gear.
*In all probability they are in the same boat as IT crews I've seen at much larger blue chip companies; under-resourced, underpaid, overwhelmed and generally dropped in it whenever the claggy stuff hits the fan. But I still want me loot and sharpish!
565
« on: July 15, 2013, 08:42 »
566
« on: July 15, 2013, 06:06 »
The IS Partner program has Shifted from knackered to FUBAR
567
« on: July 14, 2013, 10:30 »
Looking at my own port most popular has changed from:
Most DL + Time
to
Most DL/Time
Or, any new stuff that picks up immediate sales in short order rises to most popular. Some of this work has maintained position but not all. However,it does seem to have shaken my port up and I'm seeing more DL via both old and new stock - which has more than made up for the diminishing returns on my old bestsellers.
This suggests to me that SS changed the algorithm in an attempt to monetise more of the existing database and also to boost new content from the influx of contributors arriving in lifeboats from IS.
Other theories are available of course. Some are claiming a dearth of sales on any images, new or old.
568
« on: July 14, 2013, 01:30 »
It's halfway through a Canadian weekend (give or take), and I've only had one PP sale through, from 3rd. I know I only have a small port, but I usually see more than that, especially if this weekend is May AND June. It sounds like I'm not alone in seeing far fewer sales than expected (though do correct me if I'm wrong), which is a) reassuring, it's not just that my port has gone down the plughole, and b) concerning, what is going on with PP?
Its knackered mate.
569
« on: July 13, 2013, 12:06 »
Got one DL yesterday and another one appears to have dribbled out this morning. I doubt anyone will try to resolve this until Monday now - when someone from IT strolls in after their coffee and croissants and whacks the main server with a mallet.
570
« on: July 12, 2013, 10:04 »
What fool decided to bring it out in baby puke yellow?
571
« on: July 12, 2013, 10:01 »
Hmmm....People who promise easy money usually have holes in their shoes and smell like a pub carpet in my experience. And if they don't I'm even more suspicious.
572
« on: July 10, 2013, 12:47 »
Clearly the company doesn't have enough people or they hired the cheapest people possible to implement and manage their IT strategy or they have other priorities.
It really is past time someone further up the IS food chain stepped in and exhibited some leadership qualities and communicated to the contributor community direct. I'm heartily fed up with the flatulence expelled by their most windy mouthpiece.
Just imagine, if the buyers were buying and their payments to IS were being held in limbo because of a front end IT issue. Would the situation remain unresolved for a week? I think not.
573
« on: July 09, 2013, 07:15 »
They haven't sorted out the GI sales muddle, which they have said they're going to sort out before they start PP. No sense of urgency, deadlines are made and missed. I wonder how many people worked evenings and weekends on this? Silly question, probably.
I suspect the only person working evenings and weekends in their IT department wields a vacuum cleaner.
574
« on: July 09, 2013, 03:55 »
I'm up 20% on the first half of 2012 thanks largely to a great April 2013
I'll be happy if keep that growth over the second half of 2013 but outcomes at DT are very hard to predict. My earnings graph is more like a seismograph at the apex of a major earthquake.
575
« on: July 09, 2013, 03:38 »
About the same for me. My port has always been "main" collection anyway because I was too idle to take advantage of P+
It seems a bit premature to gauge impact, particularly as there are other factors; the fabled summer slow period for example where those of us without images of elfin girls prancing through the buttercups tend to suffer. I'm certainly down on last year but that's due to IS relegating all my best sellers to the wilderness and their foot in mouth management style, coupled with their arrogant treatment of customers and a porcine business strategy concerned only with getting their snout in the trough and keeping it there at all costs.
Edit. Apologies for the rant but every time I think about IS these days it induces a fizzing sense of indignation and betrayal.
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 31
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|