MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - dragonblade
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 33
551
« on: June 01, 2018, 22:37 »
Gosh a weird thing has just happened. That blue bar that advances across the upload box (which indicates the progress of the upload) has suddenly shrunk back to the beginning and disappeared. Bizarre.
Edit: And now the blue bar has started again. And close to the same time, the same file had been transferring to SS via FTP and was over 20% and then dropped down to about 2%. Weird. Meanwhile the upload of that very same file at Pond 5 seems unaffected.
Update: And now Pond 5's uploader has disappeared. The website reverted back to my existing uploads with no sign of the new file that I had been uploading. I just hope Pond 5 uses FTP as well. I'm sick of these integrated website uploaders - they can't be trusted for large video files.
552
« on: June 01, 2018, 22:29 »
This is really annoying. Ive made a few attempts to submit a 4k video to VB using their uploader. Within the upload box, there's a message that says: "Warning - Navigating away from this popup will stop your uploads." Okay fair enough. But sometimes I check back in about 20 minutes or an hour and this upload box has disappeared. So I have to start the whole upload process again from scratch. Ridiculous.
Does anyone else experience the same issue? Maybe I'll use their FTP service instead.
553
« on: May 31, 2018, 22:00 »
What is acceptable will differ from application to application, and from person to person. An untrained eye will not notice heavy compression, while a professional editor can spot it right away.
When it comes to movement / motion in a video with a low bitrate, I would say that even an untrained eye will see that there's something amiss. A few years ago, an Australian TV channel was broadcasting sports at very low bitrates. Every time a player on the field moved at a quick pace, their limbs would become a pixelated mess.
554
« on: May 31, 2018, 03:14 »
Very good points though like I already mentioned, I generally shoot my time lapse sequences in Raw anyway. Ive heard a lot of good things about Da Vinci Resolve but haven't tried it as yet.
555
« on: May 31, 2018, 02:49 »
It's VirtualDub that's giving me those strange figures. Though some images sequences I import into there have a true 16:9 aspect ratio. Unfortunately, I don't have the $$$ for After Effects. Stretching or scaling could be viable options if I could find some programs that did that. Though that may introduce unwanted distortion. I wonder if there's freeware available that could crop still images in 16:9 and batch process. Cos those images simply need a little extra trimming.
556
« on: May 30, 2018, 23:52 »
I have some time lapse videos that I want to submit for stock but I have a dilemma with the aspect ratio. I do my cropping of the Raw stills in Lightroom. And although I crop them as 16:9, it seems that Lightroom does not do a perfect 16:9 crop. Because after exporting, I find that the cropped images don't exactly meet the specifications for the HD and 4k aspect ratio standards. For example, an image sequence might be 4096 x 2303.89 instead of 4096 x 2304. Or alternatively 1920 x 1079.80 instead of 1920 x 1080. Or 3840 x 2159.89 instead of 3840 x 2160.
Of course one thing I could do is add a little bit of black to the bottom or sides of the image to produce the required pixel dimensions, allowing for a true 16:9 aspect ratio. Though one thing I notice about some stock sites like SS is that they don't like mattes or borders etc added to videos. So doing such will probably get my TL videos rejected. Would there be any solutions to this issue?
Edit: Actually, I'm wondering if this is something that is really worth worrying about at all. If I did add a bit of black to the clips to make them precisely 16:9, it would only be a few black pixels that encroach into the image area. The amount of black would be so tiny that I wonder if reviewers would even notice. Unless they have automatic systems that detect such things? I guess I may as well submit one anyway and see if it gets accepted or not.
557
« on: May 30, 2018, 21:40 »
I am not sure what it would take for a landscape image to become unsaleable... perhaps megapixel size, but I am not sure what else. But is the life of a landscape REALLY unending?
Ansel Adams landscapes are still popular.
558
« on: May 30, 2018, 19:50 »
It's been a while since Ive read Videoblock's technical requirements. I read them when I first signed up but have since forgotten some of the finer details. I read them again just now and was surprised to read that the minimum bitrate they accept is 50,000 kbps. That seems unusually high if you're submitting HD content. None of my HD cameras capture bitrates anywhere near that figure and I wouldn't exactly call them cheap cameras. They're definitely not point and shoots. Among them is a Panasonic G6 which has a fairly good reputation for HD video and produces a bitrate on average about 23,629 kbps or thereabouts. I have an older GoPro model that boasts a lower bitrate than that.
Thinking about this some more, I'm curious why they accepted a 1280 x 720 video from my Panasonic G2 since the bitrate for that clip would have been around 5,812 kbps.
559
« on: May 16, 2018, 01:18 »
Dust spot would have to be on the sensor. The lens has been cleaned and the dark spot appears in footage with and without the underwater housing. I wouldn't trust myself to open up the camera or the lens lest I stuff it up. I enquired about getting it serviced / cleaned at a camera shop but they said the cost would be prohibitive because of the tiny size of the sensor. The guy reckoned it would cost just as much to buy a new GoPro which is not an option for me cos money is tight at the moment.
560
« on: May 15, 2018, 21:07 »
The newer GoPros record at 45 or 60 mbps, but of course it can be set to lower bitrates to save space, which is probably why you saw the 15 mbps clips. I wouldn't use that unless I had to though.
I have an older GoPro Hero 3 Silver and as far as I know, the bitrate can't be changed. I don't really have any choice but to use those clips for stock as Ive got some nice footage from that camera. I won't colour grade those clips however. Though there's an additional issue. It looks like my GoPro has some dust on the sensor - sometimes it shows up as a dark spot in the footage, depending on the background colour. For some scenes, I could 'hide' that dark spot by importing the background colour from Photoshop and filling it in. Unfortunately, with some scenes with busy, constantly changing backgrounds, it would be impossible to fix.
561
« on: May 15, 2018, 12:25 »
Yea it's Panasonic AVCHD. Hmmm Ive checked the bitrate of individual clips from my Panasonic and GoPro cameras and generally, the Panny files appear to have a higher bitrate. Some of the GoPro clips are 15469kbps and 15270kbps. Whereas two random Panasonic clips are 23050kbps and 32636kbps respectively. Recently, I did some light grading of Panasonic footage that I shot through a microscope of aquatic organisms and I didn't notice any degradation of the image. So I guess I'm good to go.
562
« on: May 15, 2018, 11:09 »
Some beautiful footage there. I especially liked the lone tree immersed in the water.
Increasinglydifficult, would AVCHD clips be okay to colour grade without too much damage? I would only be doing minimal grading with mine.
563
« on: May 15, 2018, 10:51 »
Are you using ftp or the contributor portal drag and drop?
Ive tried both options with the same results. No matter what I do, certain images cannot be submitted (despite them meeting all the technical requirements.)
564
« on: May 15, 2018, 10:06 »
Thanks for the reply, Matt. By the way, when I'm uploading to Adobe Stock, I'm still experiencing those technical issues where some of my images will not make it through the portal. I'd say roughly half of the images I try and upload don't make it through. Trying multiple times and on different days doesn't seem to make a difference. It's hard to build up a decent sized portfolio on Adobe Stock when so many images cannot be submitted.
565
« on: May 15, 2018, 09:24 »
Just wondering if the Adobe Stock website is currently down? Ive been trying multiple times but I cannot access it. A message comes up saying: "503 Service Unavailable -No server is available to handle this request."
566
« on: May 12, 2018, 07:38 »
Thanks for the link! That did the trick.
567
« on: May 12, 2018, 01:53 »
I joined Videoblocks some time ago, uploaded one video but have not accessed the site since. Just now, I tried to log on but couldn't remember my password. So I used the option where it sends a message to my e-mal address to reset my password. I used my main e-mail address as this is likely the one I signed up with. However, I get the following message: "The email address cannot be located." I didn't receive any e-mails from Videoblocks or Storyblocks in that account either. Checked my spam box too but nothing in there. I then requested Videoblocks to send e-mailks to all of my other e-mail accounts in the hope that one of those may be the account that I signed up with. I got the same message above with all of them. I also checked the individual accounts but got no e-mails from the company. Checked all the spam boxes too.
I'm considering maybe joining again with a new account. The dilemma is that amongst the videos I will submit will be the same video that is currently on my first account. Is there any risk that this will be detected and me being accused of being a video thief?
568
« on: May 10, 2018, 23:49 »
I cannot upload photos at all at the moment. I keeping trying again and again and keep getting an error message. Extremely buggy.
569
« on: May 04, 2018, 00:28 »
Sorry if the topic title sounds a bit drastic. I haven't submitted videos to SS for quite a while but it sounds like things are starting to get a bit miserable there from a video shooter's perspective. It looks like there's been an increase in the dreaded $1.50 video sales. Some people are reporting that they're only getting $1.50 video sales these days and no more 'big' sales. I hope this isn't the new norm.
570
« on: April 18, 2018, 20:40 »
Ah excellent. Thankyou for the info. I'll have to start familiarising myself with Premier Elements.
571
« on: April 15, 2018, 09:08 »
The professor never got back to me. Maybe it fell through. I sent him another e-mail but he never replied. However, recently, I submitted the photo to an art exhibition where it received some positive praise. Actually, another photographer from the same exhibition wants to do a swap with me. He wants to display my surface tension photo at his place and in return, I can choose one of his photos. First time Ive done such an exchange.
572
« on: April 15, 2018, 08:19 »
You need to find an option called "interpret footage" or something similar in your software.
I played around with the software for a bit but couldn't find what I was looking for. I wonder if other software programs make this kind of thing easier. I do have Adobe Premier Elements which I haven't used yet. And I'm considering downloading Open Shot and trying that as well. All you're telling the computer to do is change the playback speed, just like with film. If you have filmed 50 frames per second, it will play back at half the original speed played back at 25 fps. Instant slow motion. 
Theoretically, yes. But the tricky thing for me is working out how to do this with software. Like I said, it's so much easier with film (at least for me.) Dead easy. Run that 54fps footage through a projector and it's instant slow motion!
573
« on: April 15, 2018, 00:53 »
Maybe it had something to do with shutter speed. I think I was using 180-degree, so the shutter speed would have been 1/125.
When cine film cameras run at high speeds, they utilise faster shutter speeds compared to filming at standard speeds (24fps.) So yea the 180 shutter principle still stands regardless. Sounds like you did everything right. By the way, I used to shoot a lot of super 8 movie film. And sometimes I would run the film at 54fps and project it at 24fps for smooth looking slow motion. Watching the footage was like poetry in motion. I wish digital was that easy.....I once shot some 50p footage with my Panasonic G6 with the intention of producing slow-mo footage. I output it as 25p with Sony Movie Studio but the footage came out at normal speed (no slow motion.)
574
« on: April 13, 2018, 12:15 »
Yea Ive contacted them just then. And yes, they don't have my payment details quite yet so I assumed they would simply put my payment on hold when I reached the threshold.
575
« on: April 13, 2018, 11:26 »
I rarely check Getty's ESP site as it's not the most user friendly. In actual fact, I haven't checked in ages. So tonight, out of curiosity, I downloaded some sales reports just to see how things are going. I started with December 2017 and noted that I had made a $31.24 sale amongst the other sales for that month. Down below, it said that my net payment was $101.13. So looks like Ive made payout at last.
I then checked January and February's sales reports from this year. And down below on each of them, it says that my net payment is $0.00 and 'Minimum payment not met.' How can this be? By the way, I haven't given Getty my payment account details yet so the funds haven't been sent to me.
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 33
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|