MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pacesetter
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 30
551
« on: May 07, 2022, 00:33 »
Several months ago I set up a shop on Etsy (inspired by someone selling in the same niche / different country and how he gets his sales - primarily from a Facebook group as he showed on his Youtube channel), complete with mockups, pricing and print paper options, but have not published it. I still need to test out prints on various paper to see how they look and then adjust options accordingly. Thing is, I actually lost interest before I even got started and with all these fees people talking about, makes my interest wane even further. Figure if these platforms are losing revenue from customers and are beginning to hit sellers to make up for it, with fees in the 'hope' of making sales, then unlikely this shop will ever see the light of day.
ETA just went back to Etsy to look at that shop I mentioned above and it is no longer selling on Etsy! Maybe (just maybe I don't have any proof) he joined the boycott or whatever is happening there with sellers. No mention on anything on his Facebook group other than he was still selling on Etsy in March. If this is the case, hope they get some better results with their protest than what MS did.
552
« on: May 07, 2022, 00:25 »
I sell POD on 3 or 4 sites, one is a good seller the others are just to get my images promoted.
Which one is a good seller?
553
« on: May 06, 2022, 20:05 »
Kinda like looking for a new captain of the Titanic after its hit the iceberg and the incumbent captain bails outta ship on the most luxurious of lifeboats.
554
« on: May 06, 2022, 16:55 »
What the chart shows is lower prices don't translate into more sales but rather the same or less sales and lower commissions.
555
« on: April 30, 2022, 17:50 »
Thanks Alex for posting your report. For mine, the award for the biggest steaming pile of turds goes equally to Shutterstock and Adobe Stock for the month of April. My video ports at both agencies have increased significantly (over 50% each) in the past 5 months only to still have falling earnings.
556
« on: April 26, 2022, 18:25 »
Thanks for this Jo Ann, interesting read.
557
« on: April 25, 2022, 18:11 »
and does contributing to that site devalue my work elsewhere.
The problem is it's devaluing the value of photography across the whole market.
Is earning an extra 20 bucks a month worth it? If you were earning $2,000 a month from microstock agencies, would you still be doing this?
But it's not your fault. The whole perception of the value of photography started a while ago. It started with Getty, then free sites started with Unsplash, and so forth. And the latest assets to be hit are now videos.
This whole perception that cheap = more, is not working. It just means cheap = cheap. Agencies are just trying to grab existing buyers from other agencies.
(And btw, if you are getting a kickback for promoting these sites, can you please state so?)
Yes very well said Annie and great to read your thoughts on this.
558
« on: April 24, 2022, 23:58 »
...
Anyway, besides that, I am reminded of the time contributors were falling over themselves to sign up for the $5 payment from Adobe (I didn't) for use of selected images for 12 months in whatever capacity it was (I think free offers). I said it then that this exercise was more than just acquiring images for more liberal use by the agency......
how many of your images (that qualified for AS program) earn $5 from adobe in a year? that's the actual decision artist made when choosing which images they'd submit
Yeh sure, that's probably a similar decision as to why the contributor above uploads to Freepik, not that I would upload there either. I was approached by Vecteezy and similarly didn't respond to their invite to upload. Just a more general observation, for all the price cuts happening I'm not seeing more sales. Perhaps others are. Just the same sales for less. Actually it is less sales for less earnings.
559
« on: April 24, 2022, 07:02 »
For all the talk about Alamy, that was the only agency so far I requested my account be closed. Pathetic with not a single sale for over a year.
Anyway, besides that, I am reminded of the time contributors were falling over themselves to sign up for the $5 payment from Adobe (I didn't) for use of selected images for 12 months in whatever capacity it was (I think free offers). I said it then that this exercise was more than just acquiring images for more liberal use by the agency... imo it was a good bit of research and testing contributors' willingness to surrender, and lookie now ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘ the cut to commissions for videos.
560
« on: April 22, 2022, 18:26 »
I could be okay with some of these lowered commissions if there was an increase in sales volume, but there isn't. It was the same on Shutterstock and now on Adobe. Just had my occasional video sale on Adobe which use to be most commonly $28. Yesterday's video sale: $6.30.
561
« on: April 20, 2022, 18:29 »
"Laughing in the purple rain" is in the same league as "Money won't make you happy".
Money won't make you happy but it can buy you a better quality of misery.
I think it was Gene Simmons who said: 'Sure, money can't buy you happiness. But it can buy you everything else.' I'm sure he speaks from experience.
562
« on: April 18, 2022, 20:54 »
Second best month ever for a $2.70 RPD overall.
563
« on: April 13, 2022, 06:37 »
Ah something weird just happened. Though the submitted video didnt show in the pending approval, it must of been accepted and has now appeared in my port. So there you go, video hasn't been lost to the ether after all, just temporarily lost visibility.
564
« on: April 13, 2022, 05:19 »
There's something currently wrong with Shutterstock's submission process where submitted videos are not showing in the pending approval. This just on the heels of the recent disappearing image and video files from ports.
565
« on: April 12, 2022, 21:19 »
Looks like something is happening with videos today.
All the ones i've submitted this morning have vanished from the "to submit" list but the pending shows 0.
Same thing happened to me today. That's the beauty of Subberstock. You just never know what you gonna wake up to: Disappearing images, disappearing videos, submitted content vanishes, downward 'adjustments' to earnings, rejections one day, acceptances the next.
566
« on: April 12, 2022, 06:52 »
If it is over for video then I don't see any future with images either. The interview was an interesting read. I sometimes wonder how Doug Jensen is doing these days as he made good dollars just on Shutterstock alone.
567
« on: April 12, 2022, 00:26 »
Sales are a shocker so far this month and when I compare to the same time period in 2021 and 2020, it's actually worse than what I thought.
So looking at Shutterstock for the same period in April (to date) comparing current earnings in 2022:
2021 : 5%
2020 : 4.5%
I would have to multiply current earnings x 20+ times to be at levels in 2021 and 2020 when I had smaller ports (much smaller in 2020).
569
« on: April 09, 2022, 20:54 »
I have been at this for over 12 years full-time I have plenty of files on a lot of sites (non-exclusive) so yes P5 Exclusive is earning me the best now for my time!
Hey jjneff so you find Pond5 Exclusive worth it by the looks of it. How many videos do you have on Pond5 Exclusive compared to the other sites? No need to mention numbers but just comparatively? Off Topic: Really miss your updates on YouTube.
570
« on: April 08, 2022, 19:08 »
Gee so all agencies purchase their algorithms from Walmart.  Last month, dopamine hits left and right. This month, only rising cortisol and blood pressure.
571
« on: April 07, 2022, 19:15 »
Iiiitttttttt's baaaaaccccckkk...
572
« on: April 04, 2022, 18:19 »
The future prognosticator suggests that if you really keep putting in the hard work you could double these results in the next month.
Strewth! If I can achieve that, contributors on Facebook group will scream at me: 'Show us your port!!'
573
« on: April 04, 2022, 18:04 »
We're now into the 4th day of the new month and it's about this time I like to conduct an early microstock performance review.
For this task, I needed to deploy high-powered performance computing systems to calculate the total gross contributor earnings on my Shutterstock portfolio.
This allows for fast and accurate calculations where large voluminous sets of diverse and complex data are involved.
I'm sure my stock contributor colleagues will agree the results of these calculations are extraordinary:
By the 4th day of April 2022, my Shutterstock port had generated an eye-watering earnings amount of:
0.10 cents !!
I just can't explain this incredible result.
574
« on: April 01, 2022, 17:46 »
Not bad: second-best March overall, behind March 2017.
That your pictures sell well, I am not surprised and is also known to me. They are very good.
That you can still increase, triggers in me the question: Do you still upload regularly?
Not really. A few items a week, if any. Mostly old stuff previously discarded for not being good enough. There is not much increase from where I stand. For the past few years, I'm oscillating around similar amounts, and that's more than OK.
And probably good video sales as well.
575
« on: April 01, 2022, 07:20 »
In terms of total earnings across the four agencies I contribute to (Sstock, Adobe Stock, iStock, Pond5) I just had my BME - exceeding my previous BME (which incidentally was back in June 2020) by 26 percent. So pretty happy with this result and feel my recent content upload activities are beginning to produce results. I am also seeing much better results on Adobe Stock and Pond5. Already starting well for April with a couple of sales on Pond5.
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 30
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|