|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sean Locke Photography
7401
« on: November 10, 2008, 15:12 »
I think you are correct and I looked at the RF as the agency and the L as him, when it was Shoosh as the RF (the real Yuri) and the RM was from the agency under his name.
So, just to clarify, the RF that is to stay up, which is the same stuff on micro, is not listed under his name, but "Shoosh".
7402
« on: November 10, 2008, 15:10 »
That was the first "exclusive" get together. There is another one in Berlin: www.istockalypse.com . There are all kinds of member led meets under the Meetups forum. They're much better now, that people in your "team" back off when it's your turn, so you can come up with something that isn't shot over your shoulder by everyone. IMO, they're more about meeting people, not as much shooting stuff that sells a ton.
7403
« on: November 10, 2008, 13:33 »
Yep, that's all it was. You can see my pics in my port. Tix were $500, iirc.
7404
« on: November 10, 2008, 13:30 »
Makes me think "How much does he make on Alamy with that %100"...
7405
« on: November 10, 2008, 12:56 »
Cmon lagereek, spill the beans. The only place I'd be surprised to find her is alamy, since quality and search are tough there.
7406
« on: November 10, 2008, 01:03 »
So, you're saying his intent was to upload the micro concert series as "L", under his name, and the RF version is what is not supposed to be there, under Shoosh? That makes even less sense having it listed RM there and RF micro.
That can't be correct at all.
7408
« on: November 09, 2008, 19:59 »
It may just be me, but there are just certain things that say to me "this should command a high price", and I'm talking about individual sales, and not volume.
7409
« on: November 09, 2008, 19:56 »
Yeah, I'm not specifically saying Getty has to allow it or anything, but you could certainly sell them on your own site if you wanted.
7411
« on: November 09, 2008, 18:19 »
I don't think this is the type of group that should be selling micro. True high end stuff should be kept for higher priced collections.
7412
« on: November 09, 2008, 18:16 »
And once an image is licensed as RF it can never be licensed as RM, even if it is taken off the RF sites.
Pssst.... sure you can. You just can't sell exclusivity or history data with the image. http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/rm-vs-rf/To the OP, guess it pays to keep a tighter reign on what you're putting out there.
7413
« on: November 09, 2008, 10:35 »
7414
« on: November 07, 2008, 17:03 »
Yeah, you can also sell your expensive equipment! 
7415
« on: November 06, 2008, 22:26 »
Because, if they delete your poor words, you don't learn the lesson on how to keyword. An xray is an xray, not every disease on the planet.
7416
« on: November 06, 2008, 22:25 »
 Mom always said, don't play ball in the house!
7417
« on: November 06, 2008, 22:16 »
 Yuri, yuri, yuri !
7418
« on: November 06, 2008, 18:31 »
Nice work!
7419
« on: November 06, 2008, 08:30 »
Here's a good, though not too active forum, for modeling: http://cube.phlatt.net/forums/spiraloid//index.phpThe guy who modelled gollum runs it. I think your eyes are too small and high. Are you working from image planes? Eyes should be around halfway up the face.
7420
« on: November 06, 2008, 00:12 »
I think what he was trying to say is: that if new files (from old or new contributor) are not allowed to climb up the best match, the collection would eventually start looking a little stale.
Ok, guess I wasn't reading it that way. Thanks...
7421
« on: November 05, 2008, 23:46 »
Why does everyone seem to assume that only new contributors can provide "newer, fresher" images?
7422
« on: November 05, 2008, 16:22 »
yeah, I wonder how many more 'big shooters' are going to enter the microstock arena in the next few years.
Maybe a few less, if everyone would stop blogging about their month by month money stream and how to succeed in microstock, and all that.
7423
« on: November 05, 2008, 06:30 »
Maybe I'll have time to make a video on the subject
7424
« on: November 04, 2008, 19:18 »
7425
« on: November 04, 2008, 17:09 »
Because iStock markets their _exclusive_ collection as being a set of images that are _exclusively_ available on iStock. Putting the same image or similars on RM sites dilutes that campaign.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
