MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: DELETED  (Read 1611 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 26, 2017, 09:05 »
0
?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: February 27, 2017, 10:03 by Liorpt »


« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2017, 09:22 »
0
.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2017, 10:04 by Liorpt »

outoftheblue

« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2017, 16:15 »
+1
Difficult case.
It's an attempt at stuffing as many keywords as possible into a title.
And not in the best possible English.
Yet all words are relevant, so not actually spam.

« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2017, 17:19 »
+6
I don't think it is difficult at all - if Shutterstock cared at all about their collection, they'd weed out garbage like this. The keywords are terrible and the titles are completely unhelpful to a buyer. I looked at some of the other images in this contributor's portfolio and it's stuffed with this sort of rubbish.

Nothing wrong with the images; everything wrong with the metadata.

Photodune Reject

« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2017, 23:00 »
0
I don't think it is difficult at all - if Shutterstock cared at all about their collection, they'd weed out garbage like this. The keywords are terrible and the titles are completely unhelpful to a buyer. I looked at some of the other images in this contributor's portfolio and it's stuffed with this sort of rubbish.

Nothing wrong with the images; everything wrong with the metadata.

Plus One!

If this site had a program called, "MSG Got Talent" you would be Simon Cowell.  :)


« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2017, 23:51 »
0
"title spamming" not working anymore there are some contributor using "keyword spamming" instead and seem that work well.

« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2017, 01:41 »
0
Don't know if the mountain example is spamming without the image. If they are relevant it isn't spamming as he/she hasn't repeated any keywords. Each is a different phrase.

« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2017, 02:38 »
0
   DELETED
« Last Edit: February 27, 2017, 10:01 by Liorpt »

« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2017, 02:57 »
0
I guess all those phrases are in the auto suggestions provided by SS....so using their own keywording tool is probably...ok? (So long as there are all those things in the pic - or at least they are reasonable).
Seems wrong though. If you report it, will be interested to hear reply!

« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2017, 03:47 »
0
   So I'll ask this, and state that I have an interest in it (eliminating unfair competition). Is it legitimate to report?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The container shot is spam report it to compliance@shutterstock.com

« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2017, 04:23 »
0
I guess all those phrases are in the auto suggestions provided by SS....so using their own keywording tool is probably...ok? (So long as there are all those things in the pic - or at least they are reasonable).
Seems wrong though. If you report it, will be interested to hear reply!
There's also a problem with the suggested keyword corrections when you upload. If you click one of the suggestions and it is already in your keywords it puts it in as a repeat rather than just deleting it.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Deleted

Started by vonkara Dreamstime.com

11 Replies
4098 Views
Last post March 05, 2009, 00:23
by epixx
Deleted

Started by Milinz Veer

0 Replies
1285 Views
Last post June 12, 2009, 03:24
by Milinz
0 Replies
1289 Views
Last post July 31, 2009, 08:35
by takestock
5 Replies
3005 Views
Last post November 26, 2010, 08:45
by Michaelp
2 Replies
2663 Views
Last post April 14, 2011, 07:12
by texelart

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results