Author Topic: DELETED (Read 4311 times)

BigBubba · « **on:** February 26, 2017, 09:05 »

?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BigBubba · « **Reply #1 on:** February 26, 2017, 09:22 »

outoftheblue · « **Reply #2 on:** February 26, 2017, 16:15 »

Difficult case.
It's an attempt at stuffing as many keywords as possible into a title.
And not in the best possible English.
Yet all words are relevant, so not actually spam.

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #3 on:** February 26, 2017, 17:19 »

I don't think it is difficult at all - if Shutterstock cared at all about their collection, they'd weed out garbage like this. The keywords are terrible and the titles are completely unhelpful to a buyer. I looked at some of the other images in this contributor's portfolio and it's stuffed with this sort of rubbish.

Nothing wrong with the images; everything wrong with the metadata.

Photodune Reject · « **Reply #4 on:** February 26, 2017, 23:00 »

Quote from: Jo Ann Snover on February 26, 2017, 17:19

I don't think it is difficult at all - if Shutterstock cared at all about their collection, they'd weed out garbage like this. The keywords are terrible and the titles are completely unhelpful to a buyer. I looked at some of the other images in this contributor's portfolio and it's stuffed with this sort of rubbish.

Nothing wrong with the images; everything wrong with the metadata.

Plus One!

If this site had a program called, "MSG Got Talent" you would be Simon Cowell.

noppasinw239 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 26, 2017, 23:51 »

"title spamming" not working anymore there are some contributor using "keyword spamming" instead and seem that work well.

Justanotherphotographer · « **Reply #6 on:** February 27, 2017, 01:41 »

Don't know if the mountain example is spamming without the image. If they are relevant it isn't spamming as he/she hasn't repeated any keywords. Each is a different phrase.

BigBubba · « **Reply #7 on:** February 27, 2017, 02:38 »

DELETED

sarah2 · « **Reply #8 on:** February 27, 2017, 02:57 »

I guess all those phrases are in the auto suggestions provided by SS....so using their own keywording tool is probably...ok? (So long as there are all those things in the pic - or at least they are reasonable).
Seems wrong though. If you report it, will be interested to hear reply!

dpimborough · « **Reply #9 on:** February 27, 2017, 03:47 »

Quote from: Liorpt on February 27, 2017, 02:38

So I'll ask this, and state that I have an interest in it (eliminating unfair competition). Is it legitimate to report?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The container shot is spam report it to [email protected]

Justanotherphotographer · « **Reply #10 on:** February 27, 2017, 04:23 »

Quote from: sarah2 on February 27, 2017, 02:57

I guess all those phrases are in the auto suggestions provided by SS....so using their own keywording tool is probably...ok? (So long as there are all those things in the pic - or at least they are reasonable).
Seems wrong though. If you report it, will be interested to hear reply!

There's also a problem with the suggested keyword corrections when you upload. If you click one of the suggestions and it is already in your keywords it puts it in as a repeat rather than just deleting it.