MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Poll

On Shutterstock, how many images do you need to earn $10,000 month

5,000
23 (6.7%)
7,500
9 (2.6%)
10,000
13 (3.8%)
12,500
5 (1.5%)
15,000
10 (2.9%)
17.500
11 (3.2%)
20,000
37 (10.8%)
22,500
2 (0.6%)
25,000
13 (3.8%)
27,500
0 (0%)
30,000
36 (10.5%)
32,500
5 (1.5%)
35,000
6 (1.7%)
37,500
4 (1.2%)
40,000
170 (49.4%)

Total Members Voted: 318

Author Topic: How many images do you need to achieve $10,000/month  (Read 60335 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: October 02, 2014, 13:02 »
+17
Hi All,

Just a quick share in case it is of help. We uploaded 3,200 images 6 years ago we have not uploaded since, last month was $1,007 at Shutterstock. In the six years those 3,200 images have returned $95,800 at Shutterstock. If people share numbers we can all get a much better idea of what we can expect from our efforts. Hope this helps.

Cheers,
J


Ed

« Reply #26 on: October 02, 2014, 13:52 »
+1
The only other agency that is targeting midstock customers is stocksy. But they are doing it with a niche, while istock also sells objects on white to that segment.

There are many, many, many agencies out there that target midstock customers.  It's not just Stocksy.  Most of these agencies do not allow you to also submit the same images to microstock agencies.  Superstock and Inmagine come to mind off the top of my head.

Rinderart

« Reply #27 on: October 02, 2014, 16:28 »
+2
Good Thread leaf. about 6 years ago I asked the powers that be if I could open another account as a factory type thing. I had 10 strong players that wanted to do it, They said no at that time. Im a full time photographer and painter and have been long before Microstock, I also do a lot of old time catalog client work for interior decorators and furniture makers so Im kinda stingy with uploading so much for the possible income, Only so much time in a day and at 71 im slowing down or trying to.

Where I live and lifestyle, My expenses are very High so Microstock even in the best of times only accounts for maybe 30/35% of what I need to generate..so, I have to keep the paying jobs and do Micro as a supplement. I only have 5333 Images and 150 Footage clips but based on my income only from SS I estimate to make 10K a month would be in the 30K range. I would still like to do a group thing and My pardner and I will be discussing this during a trip coming up Monday and, I would not necessarily do it on SS. Also, I have no idea how we would handle the accounting part of it. There have been group "Factory" people since day one..wizdata and chinatiger come to mind back in the early days, these guys had tens of thousands in 2005. We would be looking for 8/10 folks that do specific subjects so we can be a one stop shop.portraits,food,lifestyle,travel etc,etc.

conceivably, we could have at least 80,000 images or so right off the bat. Symbio,Faa...whatever. interested? lets chat. By PM.

« Reply #28 on: October 02, 2014, 17:17 »
0
i find this ironic, even coming from leaf himself.
why should this be a hypothetical question when we can extrapolate from real earners
from the sean locke to yuri arcurses to dolgachoves etc
i know it is about ss and when sean locke was earning big money, he was with IS
and no doubt could have earned less with ss being that he just joined.
also, that exclusives of IS are difficult to extrapolate with ss since they earn no doubt alot more
with IS ie before the great eff-up when the owner sold it to big gorilla. guerilla G ;)

still, the number is more realistic if u took these real people, don't u think????

fritz

  • I love Tom and Jerry music

« Reply #29 on: October 02, 2014, 17:37 »
+3
52196 files

stock-will-eat-itself

« Reply #30 on: October 02, 2014, 17:46 »
+6
What I find interesting is the three peaks in earnings at 20k, 30k and 40k.  The latter I understand, but do the other two represent particular types of portfolio?

The 20k and below peaks are pro shooters with budgets for each shoot, the 40k and above are the zero budget shooters saturating the libraries.

Problem is the saturators are killing the pro images that attract the buyers in the first place.

At some point MidStock needs to establish itself again or the libraries will become stale as the pros will have moved on.

« Reply #31 on: October 02, 2014, 18:03 »
+4
Based on my average monthly return for this calendar year with 8 agencies (top and middle tiers), I would need 18,000. Unfortunately, to create that many images would take another 15+ years.

However, I would never join a factory. The problem with groups is that ultimately they always perform down to their lowest common denominator. Aspiring, creative and productive individuals are always better off on their own. So, in the above factory suggestion: the accounting would be crucial !

Rinderart

« Reply #32 on: October 02, 2014, 18:34 »
0
I agree with that. A bigger piece of the pie is my Motivation in essence a mini pro stock site or Port.

"The best of Royalty Free" as it were. Of which I own the name.

certainly not for anyone and certainly non exclusive. It's just an Idea I've had for years. Not much More. But, I may act on it. whats to lose? nothing. Im pretty sure I can get 10 with 10,000 images. all it would be is like joining a new site but Like said the accounting would be tough But doable.

Back to topic.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2014, 18:48 by Rinderart »

« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2014, 22:40 »
+25
i find this ironic, even coming from leaf himself.
why should this be a hypothetical question when we can extrapolate from real earners
from the sean locke to yuri arcurses to dolgachoves etc

Using Sean, Yuri, Dolgachov, Monkeybusiness and the like to suggest what someone will make on Shutterstock is like using Brad Pitt, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts to figure out what you will make if you go into acting. 

« Reply #34 on: October 03, 2014, 07:17 »
0
What I find interesting is the three peaks in earnings at 20k, 30k and 40k.  The latter I understand, but do the other two represent particular types of portfolio?

The 20k and below peaks are pro shooters with budgets for each shoot, the 40k and above are the zero budget shooters saturating the libraries.


I think you're probably spot on.

« Reply #35 on: October 03, 2014, 07:19 »
+2
i find this ironic, even coming from leaf himself.
why should this be a hypothetical question when we can extrapolate from real earners
from the sean locke to yuri arcurses to dolgachoves etc

Using Sean, Yuri, Dolgachov, Monkeybusiness and the like to suggest what someone will make on Shutterstock is like using Brad Pitt, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts to figure out what you will make if you go into acting. 

haha.. good analogy. 

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2014, 07:24 »
0
The 20k and below peaks are pro shooters with budgets for each shoot, the 40k and above are the zero budget shooters saturating the libraries.
So if you spend no money, you only need 2x as many files?
I guess you didn't mean these figures literally.

Valo

« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2014, 07:32 »
+2
I need 30K images, so that makes me a semi-pro then, which is about right.  ;)

« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2014, 09:03 »
+11
I would need 18,000 to 20,000 images, but I don't think it would work that way. I think your return per image drops some as you add more. How much of a drop would be really hard to figure out. Not to mention, sales on Shutterstock aren't as consistent as they used to be. I used to be able to know almost exactly how many sales I would get on a weekday. Now it's up and down more.

Also, I'm a zero budget shooter "polluting the library."

« Reply #39 on: October 03, 2014, 11:39 »
+2
i find this ironic, even coming from leaf himself.
why should this be a hypothetical question when we can extrapolate from real earners
from the sean locke to yuri arcurses to dolgachoves etc

Using Sean, Yuri, Dolgachov, Monkeybusiness and the like to suggest what someone will make on Shutterstock is like using Brad Pitt, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts to figure out what you will make if you go into acting.

LMAO, hey... we can't dream, can't we?
seriously, good point.


« Reply #40 on: October 03, 2014, 11:46 »
+3
I would need 18,000 to 20,000 images, but, sales on Shutterstock aren't as consistent as they used to be. I used to be able to know almost exactly how many sales I would get on a weekday. Now it's up and down more.
Hi All,

Just a quick share in case it is of help. We uploaded 3,200 images 6 years ago we have not uploaded since, last month was $1,007 at Shutterstock. In the six years those 3,200 images have returned $95,800 at Shutterstock. If people share numbers we can all get a much better idea of what we can expect from our efforts. Hope this helps.

Cheers,
J

the first poster sums it all up . Mr. Jonathan Ross said repeat 6 YEARS AGO, HAVE NOT UPLOADED SINCE 8)
ie. it worked 6 years ago . not today since new images are scant earners.
my case is the same, ie. consistent earners were uploaded many years ago.
and robhainer's point i agree too. uploading xxx,000 today will not make an increase in earning in equal expectation six+ years ago.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2014, 12:24 by etudiante_rapide »

« Reply #41 on: October 03, 2014, 12:43 »
+1
I'm not more of the Adam Sandler type?  No?  George Clooney it is! ;)


Hobostocker

    This user is banned.
« Reply #42 on: October 03, 2014, 13:47 »
0
the 40k and above are the zero budget shooters saturating the libraries.

Problem is the saturators are killing the pro images that attract the buyers in the first place.

At some point MidStock needs to establish itself again or the libraries will become stale as the pros will have moved on.

but agencies are buyers think otherwise.

Tror

« Reply #43 on: October 03, 2014, 14:06 »
+2
I'm not more of the Adam Sandler type?  No?  George Clooney it is! ;)

Hehe, at least your Icon makes me think more of Bruce Willis :-) Stock hard :D

« Reply #44 on: October 03, 2014, 14:24 »
0
I just remembered that this sort of discussion is probably banned under the amendments to the SS contract.

« Reply #45 on: October 03, 2014, 15:47 »
+2
I just remembered that this sort of discussion is probably banned under the amendments to the SS contract.

I would hardly think this could be considered as sharing of detailed sales data.

« Reply #46 on: October 03, 2014, 15:52 »
+2
I would need 18,000 to 20,000 images, but, sales on Shutterstock aren't as consistent as they used to be. I used to be able to know almost exactly how many sales I would get on a weekday. Now it's up and down more.
Hi All,

Just a quick share in case it is of help. We uploaded 3,200 images 6 years ago we have not uploaded since, last month was $1,007 at Shutterstock. In the six years those 3,200 images have returned $95,800 at Shutterstock. If people share numbers we can all get a much better idea of what we can expect from our efforts. Hope this helps.

Cheers,
J

the first poster sums it all up . Mr. Jonathan Ross said repeat 6 YEARS AGO, HAVE NOT UPLOADED SINCE 8)
ie. it worked 6 years ago . not today since new images are scant earners.
my case is the same, ie. consistent earners were uploaded many years ago.
and robhainer's point i agree too. uploading xxx,000 today will not make an increase in earning in equal expectation six+ years ago.

This makes most sense.  What worked in the glory days is much more hard to do now.  My case I keep adding photos and income stays flat or drops.   Would take more images than by myself I can produce to get me to 10k/month on just SS before my old images lose their value.

« Reply #47 on: October 03, 2014, 15:53 »
+2
As I recall, and I haven't gone back to check, the injunction is against releasing information that has come into our possession as a result of our membership of the site that would not be known to the general public. I don't recall anything being said about it being okay to release info as long as it is not classed as "detailed sales data".  Perhaps SS can clarify this.

« Reply #48 on: October 03, 2014, 15:56 »
0
I'm not more of the Adam Sandler type?  No?  George Clooney it is! ;)

LOL!  I would not mind having Adam Sandlers bank account.   But hopefully your wife will agree with George Clooney.  😉 ;D

« Reply #49 on: October 03, 2014, 16:04 »
+2
As I recall, and I haven't gone back to check, the injunction is against releasing information that has come into our possession as a result of our membership of the site that would not be known to the general public. I don't recall anything being said about it being okay to release info as long as it is not classed as "detailed sales data".  Perhaps SS can clarify this.

Scott made a good reply in the TOS thread, stating Again, the spirit of the clause is to prevent the disclosure of specific information to competitors of Shutterstock.   

Hi All,

Gbalex, youre right about the customer TOS.   Most of the changes to the customer ToS were in the category of cleaning up -- items that may have been ambiguous for customers or not perfectly aligned with the day-to-day reality of working with them.  Therefore, were explaining those changes directly to customers, but didnt wrap that in a larger contributor communication. 

The most obvious exception is limitations on Web use and digital sizes.  The historical limitation was 800x600 pixels.  Given dramatic advancements in display technology, we were overdue to modernize our standards. The new ToS does a better job of meeting customer needs while continuing to prohibit the redistribution of images.  To properly license your images on a global scale in an era of Retina displays and a wider array of devices, we need to accommodate modern technology, but we also take copyright violations very seriously.

Earnings

Tyler to respond to your question about earnings:

As stated,  it's not an issue to talk in general terms about your best month ever, worst month ever, isolated individual transactions, most popular image, or information of a very similar, generalized nature.  For that reason, the following examples would not be a violation of our ToS. 

Quote

- I had a BME on SS last month
- I just got a $100 SOD sale on Shutterstock
- I just got an extended license on this image
- I only got 50 sales today
- I just passed the $500 mark and am now in the next earning level
- I get about 100 downloads a month on Shutterstock


The following examples could be a violation of the ToS, depending on the context.  Again, the spirit of the clause is to prevent the disclosure of specific information to competitors of Shutterstock.   

Quote
- I earned $1000 on Shutterstock last month
- I earned $1000 on Shutterstock last month, $500 from subs $300 from OD and $200 from video
- Here's a screenshot of all my Shutterstock earnings...

Participating anonymously in an online poll or speaking with family and friends casually would not be an issue for practical purposes.

With respect to Cobalts post, Ill say that our confidentiality agreement has a very specific purpose that has been outlined above.   We continue to strive to be transparent, fair, supportive and open with our contributors.  We do want Shutterstock to be a place that contributors hold in high esteem and respect your concerns and feedback.


Best,


Scott
VP of Content



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
38 Replies
16816 Views
Last post February 06, 2009, 23:50
by lephotography
17 Replies
7771 Views
Last post May 14, 2010, 10:37
by fotografer
2 Replies
4661 Views
Last post September 15, 2013, 12:07
by leaf
9 Replies
5824 Views
Last post May 23, 2021, 23:42
by cristianstorto
0 Replies
962 Views
Last post February 17, 2024, 19:29
by The Mighty Jungle

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors