Author Topic: Interesting New Feature - galleries and profile (Read 17081 times)

WarrenPrice · « **on:** November 12, 2012, 11:03 »

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=125816

admin edit: changed the subject so we can find the thread in the future

cthoman · « **Reply #1 on:** November 12, 2012, 11:18 »

Better late than never. It only took them a few years to implement my suggestion.

Regardless, a good feature that was much needed. It will be interesting to see what they came up with.

microstockphoto.co.uk · « **Reply #2 on:** November 12, 2012, 11:27 »

I know it's a different thing but... it may easily turn out to be a better option than my own web site on Photoshelter (where sales are non-existent, and I even pay for storage).

Microbius · « **Reply #3 on:** November 12, 2012, 11:32 »

Doesn't work for me, I am one of those getting the reported bugs

EmberMike · « **Reply #4 on:** November 12, 2012, 11:36 »

The new Display Name and portfolio URL features are currently broken. You can't set them.

cobalt · « **Reply #5 on:** November 12, 2012, 11:44 »

I wish we had that on Getty...

sc · « **Reply #6 on:** November 12, 2012, 13:01 »

It's a server load issue - because we are all trying to do the same thing at the same time. They have posted about it in their forums a have implemented some fixes - It worked for me now.

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=125817&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #7 on:** November 12, 2012, 13:45 »

Anyone else want to show how they've chosen galleries? It's not really pimping as there aren't any buyers here, but I'd be happy to comment on other people's choices to make suggestions if others want to do the same.

Here's my gallery set. I figured I'd move the order around seasonally, as sales indicate.

Elenathewise · « **Reply #8 on:** November 12, 2012, 14:49 »

What do they mean by "public" sets - does it mean these images will be offered for free? I am confused by the word "public" - my entire portfolio is publicly accessible on SS, anyone can explain what would be the difference?

sc · « **Reply #9 on:** November 12, 2012, 14:55 »

Quote from: Elenathewise on November 12, 2012, 14:49

What do they mean by "public" sets - does it mean these images will be offered for free? I am confused by the word "public" - my entire portfolio is publicly accessible on SS, anyone can explain what would be the difference?

Explained here
http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/introducing-portfolio-pages

Noedelhap · « **Reply #10 on:** November 12, 2012, 16:45 »

Quote from: Elenathewise on November 12, 2012, 14:49

What do they mean by "public" sets - does it mean these images will be offered for free? I am confused by the word "public" - my entire portfolio is publicly accessible on SS, anyone can explain what would be the difference?

It's comparable with Istock's lightboxes; you can create various sets of similar photos or illustrations for display on your profile page. It allows customers to easily find images from the same collection, thus increasing sales.

Elenathewise · « **Reply #11 on:** November 12, 2012, 16:55 »

Ok - thanks! That makes sense.

KB · « **Reply #12 on:** November 12, 2012, 17:48 »

Quote from: Noedelhap on November 12, 2012, 16:45

It's comparable with Istock's lightboxes; you can create various sets of similar photos or illustrations for display on your profile page. It allows customers to easily find images from the same collection, thus increasing sales.

Too bad (for me, anyway) that they don't allow footage to be added to these.

lisafx · « **Reply #13 on:** November 12, 2012, 17:52 »

Too bad they didn't do this years ago when I had relatively few files, instead of now when I have to organize over 7k images if I am going to benefit from this feature...

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #14 on:** November 12, 2012, 17:59 »

Quote from: lisafx on November 12, 2012, 17:52

Too bad they didn't do this years ago when I had relatively few files, instead of now when I have to organize over 7k images if I am going to benefit from this feature...

It's a lot easier to organize given that you can search in the catalog manager interface and then select everything from that search to add to a set. Give it a try with some top categories (senior couple, gorgeous husband...) to see - even if you only do 10 sets you'll get some boost from a nice portfolio page with galleries. It's tons better in that respect than iStock's interface...

WarrenPrice · « **Reply #15 on:** November 12, 2012, 18:10 »

Lisa, it may take a few seconds to find and sort your 7k images but ... it should be well worth the effort. As Jo Ann pointed out ... the manager does the work for you. Many of your files will be in more that one "set." Just do key word search and move the entire search to the new "set."
Took me some time to figure out how easy that was. The part that is kicking my butt now is how to use social media ... or, is will social media really offer benefit?

@ Jo Ann, are you using social media ... facebook, twitter, etc?

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #16 on:** November 12, 2012, 18:27 »

I really don't want to mix SS up with my personal facebook and I don't have a "business" one that's separate. I do have Linked In and Twitter, but I've never seen any point in using them for business purposes (and I know every business on the planet thinks that this is the hot thing, but I'm not convinced you do anything but piss people off

That's a long way of saying "No"

WarrenPrice · « **Reply #17 on:** November 12, 2012, 18:38 »

my thoughts too.
Looked at your sets. All I can offer is envy.

gillian vann · « **Reply #18 on:** November 12, 2012, 18:46 »

Quote from: jsnover on November 12, 2012, 18:27

I really don't want to mix SS up with my personal facebook and I don't have a "business" one that's separate. I do have Linked In and Twitter, but I've never seen any point in using them for business purposes (and I know every business on the planet thinks that this is the hot thing, but I'm not convinced you do anything but piss people off

That's a long way of saying "No"

thank you for saying it, cos I too think you just annoy people. Lately I've been unliking Pages on fb cos I'm just annoyed at how often they post, and the content is drivel. Don't get me started on Twitter! and Pinterest is a dirty word, even though it's fast becoming the ItGirl of social media.

I too have portfolio envy

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #19 on:** November 12, 2012, 19:06 »

Quote from: WarrenPrice on November 12, 2012, 18:38

my thoughts too.
Looked at your sets. All I can offer is envy.

I looked at your sets, and I think my feedback would be to break things down a bit more to avoid too many unrelated images in a group. So in the Travel & Tourism section, for example, you have a ton of pictures of people racing dirt bikes, some vintage cars, some food, some isolated flowers, etc. Even if you had to travel to get the bluebonnet pictures, I don't think I expect to see isolated flowers in that section.

I'm trying to decide if I should set a maximum on how many images I put in a set. The thinking is that if it gets too big, no one's going to look at the last pages, so we're better off to keep it to one or two.

WarrenPrice · « **Reply #20 on:** November 12, 2012, 19:19 »

I see what you mean. My port (key wording) needs some work. Any time I used a state for keyword ... it also got to be travel/tourism.
I need to fix that before I get 7 thousand images.

I'm hoping this will give buyers a better tool to find me with ... without getting pissed off about "unintended" spam.

gostwyck · « **Reply #21 on:** November 12, 2012, 21:14 »

Quote from: jsnover on November 12, 2012, 18:27

I really don't want to mix SS up with my personal facebook and I don't have a "business" one that's separate. I do have Linked In and Twitter, but I've never seen any point in using them for business purposes (and I know every business on the planet thinks that this is the hot thing, but I'm not convinced you do anything but piss people off

That's a long way of saying "No"

So true. I hope SS aren't falling into the trap of over-complicating their product like IS have done so absurdly. The KISS principle has worked very well for SS so far.

cthoman · « **Reply #22 on:** November 12, 2012, 21:26 »

Quote from: gostwyck on November 12, 2012, 21:14

So true. I hope SS aren't falling into the trap of over-complicating their product like IS have done so absurdly. The KISS principle has worked very well for SS so far.

I'm just happy I can finally put a link to my website. I'm sure that has cost me some money over the years in lost freelance work. It's shocking that it took them this long to implement that.

gostwyck · « **Reply #23 on:** November 12, 2012, 21:32 »

Quote from: cthoman on November 12, 2012, 21:26

I'm just happy I can finally put a link to my website. I'm sure that has cost me some money over the years in lost freelance work. It's shocking that it took them this long to implement that.

Not really. Their job as your agent was to sell your work via their own portal rather than promote your own which excludes them.

cthoman · « **Reply #24 on:** November 12, 2012, 22:32 »

Quote from: gostwyck on November 12, 2012, 21:32

Quote from: cthoman on November 12, 2012, 21:26
I'm just happy I can finally put a link to my website. I'm sure that has cost me some money over the years in lost freelance work. It's shocking that it took them this long to implement that.

Not really. Their job as your agent was to sell your work via their own portal rather than promote your own which excludes them.

Their job is to make money for themselves. I'm just a not-so-necessary evil.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Interesting New Feature - galleries and profile (Read 17081 times)

WarrenPrice

cthoman

microstockphoto.co.uk

Microbius

EmberMike

cobalt

sc

Jo Ann Snover

Elenathewise

sc

Noedelhap

Elenathewise

KB

lisafx

Jo Ann Snover

WarrenPrice

Jo Ann Snover

WarrenPrice

gillian vann

Jo Ann Snover

WarrenPrice

gostwyck

cthoman

gostwyck

cthoman

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors