pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: SS new world record: review time 15 ( fifteen) SECONDS  (Read 10553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #75 on: September 28, 2016, 03:52 »
0
of course there is no bot, bots cant check for trademark infringment, but they do use automated processes to prescreen images for other issues. its not rocket science, as soon as the image is not deemed in focus, its rejected, and then we moan to cs, and then a person will tell you to resubmit,

What about those blurry backgrounds, how do bots know, what they are and not reject them for focus?

I had rejections for blurry effect in water. If was a bot, i think they search on exif speed data. If was sn human, I think he is stupid


Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk


« Reply #76 on: September 28, 2016, 05:02 »
0
Speed doesn't matter if you use tripod....

« Reply #77 on: September 28, 2016, 06:19 »
+1
Water is moving.... I allways use tripod with water, but it's not the same effect at 3 seconds or at 1/250 seconds


Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

« Reply #78 on: September 28, 2016, 08:42 »
+1
There's a significant difference between saying "there is no bot" and saying "we don't use any automated screening, it's all done by human reviewers".    They're hiding behind the word "bot" which means different things to different people.   Obviously when 15 photos are accepted or rejected in seconds, an automated system was responsible. 

Rinderart

« Reply #79 on: September 29, 2016, 00:07 »
+1
Tell Them, I've done all I can. They wanna Play that way. Nothing we can do. and Im tired.. I did a last test today I sent a Completely new release today with 7 new Images submitted before.. twice now. release taken from there Legal Page. The model is in My Port more than 250 Times over 3.5 years "WITH" BTW a 11 year Old release. Rejected again. I can only assume I have no clue anymore how to fill Out a release. Im done.

« Reply #80 on: September 29, 2016, 09:35 »
+1
The real story will come out in time.  Keep in mind that automated screening isn't speculation, it's fact - a few years ago, in their SEC filings, they said they were using it, and obviously saw this as something investors would like to hear.  The problem is they've tried to go too far, too fast.  Remember early (80s and 90s) attempts at handwriting and speech recognition?

 

« Reply #81 on: September 29, 2016, 11:21 »
+1
Sure, it's totally feasible that Shutterstock has enough curators ready and going 24 hours a day to accurately review all 1,000,000+ weekly uploaded stock images, and their releases, within seconds of the images being submitted. Why would anyone have conjectured that it's an automated system?
« Last Edit: September 29, 2016, 11:52 by Daryl Ray »

Rinderart

« Reply #82 on: September 29, 2016, 23:14 »
+1
With all respect i don't think the word "Curators" is approaiate for the review staff at SS or any Other Micro site. Curator is a Museum Or Fine art gallery occupation. this is about In focus and no Noise basically.

« Reply #83 on: September 30, 2016, 02:29 »
+1
I got a wonderful combo of upload-approved-sold in 5 minutes

« Reply #84 on: September 30, 2016, 02:43 »
+1
I got a wonderful combo of upload-approved-sold in 5 minutes
Now that is an interesting record I'd like to beat!

« Reply #85 on: September 30, 2016, 02:49 »
+3
I got a wonderful combo of upload-approved-sold in 5 minutes
Now that is an interesting record I'd like to beat!
Keep in mind we're talking 36 cents

« Reply #86 on: September 30, 2016, 05:07 »
0
So you managed to remove that "Why?". It was funny though.....

« Reply #87 on: September 30, 2016, 08:56 »
0
So you managed to remove that "Why?". It was funny though.....
Yeah...I liked it, but it made communication very hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

« Reply #88 on: September 30, 2016, 09:39 »
0
Why?

« Reply #89 on: September 30, 2016, 11:31 »
0
Why?
It was the best conversation engaging signature ever.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

« Reply #90 on: September 30, 2016, 12:24 »
0
Why?




....Just kidding...


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
4209 Views
Last post May 02, 2011, 14:52
by daveh900
41 Replies
7248 Views
Last post May 03, 2012, 17:21
by luissantos84
11 Replies
2957 Views
Last post May 28, 2012, 03:34
by fotografer
1 Replies
1649 Views
Last post March 18, 2014, 07:01
by nicku
2 Replies
1002 Views
Last post July 23, 2018, 17:42
by increasingdifficulty

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results