Author Topic: Reviewers are a joke (Read 5318 times)

Slovenian · « **on:** November 04, 2011, 04:00 »

" Reason: • severe vignetting..sorry..."

Yeah, added vignette to a couple of images accepted everywhere you ff-ing muppet!

Michael Lancaster · « **Reply #1 on:** November 04, 2011, 06:44 »

lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Paulo M. F. Pires · « **Reply #2 on:** November 04, 2011, 06:49 »

I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

FD · « **Reply #3 on:** November 04, 2011, 08:33 »

Quote from: CoisaX on November 04, 2011, 06:49

Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"

Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.

Slovenian · « **Reply #4 on:** November 04, 2011, 09:31 »

Quote from: Michael Lancaster on November 04, 2011, 06:44

lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites

Quote from: CoisaX on November 04, 2011, 06:49

I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo

(or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

avava · « **Reply #5 on:** November 07, 2011, 22:20 »

Quote from: Slovenian on November 04, 2011, 09:31

Quote from: Michael Lancaster on November 04, 2011, 06:44
lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites

Quote from: CoisaX on November 04, 2011, 06:49
I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo (or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

BS is nice to me.

Mantis · « **Reply #6 on:** November 10, 2011, 19:09 »

Quote from: AttilaTheNun on November 04, 2011, 08:33

Quote from: CoisaX on November 04, 2011, 06:49
Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"
Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.

I know how to spell immature and you fit that bill pretty well.