Author Topic: review times?? (Read 19365 times)

cobalt · « **Reply #75 on:** October 24, 2023, 05:28 »

Again I had some seasonal ai illustrations inspected within 14 days. But not everything. There must be some reviewers going through the queue and picking out some seasonal content earlier.

I really appreciate that. So I added some autumn content in the hope it still has a little chance.

My ai photos seem to reviewed at around one month which is also an improevment.

Overall my backlog has decreased from having 300 files in the queue to around 100.

If it stays like this I am fine, it makes timing seasonal content a lot easier.

But just in case I am already uploading a little easter and even summer.

erik trikowich · « **Reply #77 on:** October 24, 2023, 13:37 »

Quote from: MatHayward on October 24, 2023, 11:15

They pointed out that when they hired me, they were hoping for "human intelligence". Clearly, that didn't work out so this one was a swing and a miss.
Mat

But in reality, whose intelligence is it? Or are you hinting that if you work with artificial intelligence for a long time, become a cyborg

And is it worth understanding that you are no longer associated with Adobe Stock at all?

cascoly · « **Reply #78 on:** October 24, 2023, 15:39 »

Quote from: Injustice for all on October 23, 2023, 19:14

Quote from: cascoly on October 23, 2023, 13:21
the problem isnt just the long review times - it's random chance of review - many here reporting reviews of a week while others have images stewing for months.

i recently had a handful of images rejected (for the usual vague 'quality' reasons) that were submitted about a week ago, while many others (including AIM) have been there for 2 months

maybe it depends on the quantity you send,I never have such long times,a couple of weeks max,because I send about a thousand contents in a year.
...

while i've had over 700 images accepted at SS over the last 2 months, i've limited my uploads to AS to 50-100 per week. I continued to upload in order to get in line for the long review times.

meanwhile i have only had a few rejections since the end of august but none approved since then either.

worse, the system still rejects ai-gen for lack of model release -- it just rejected a series sent a month ago - and when you click to re-submit, it shows it knows the image is ai-gen but now has an addtl box to click that says "people here are fictional" and even worser, after making the changes, and saving or submitting again (the prompts vary!) nothing happens - the image doesnt show up in 'new' or 'submitted'

[i've send a msg to suppoort]

Injustice for all · « **Reply #79 on:** October 24, 2023, 19:25 »

Quote from: cascoly on October 24, 2023, 15:39

Quote from: Injustice for all on October 23, 2023, 19:14
Quote from: cascoly on October 23, 2023, 13:21
the problem isnt just the long review times - it's random chance of review - many here reporting reviews of a week while others have images stewing for months.

i recently had a handful of images rejected (for the usual vague 'quality' reasons) that were submitted about a week ago, while many others (including AIM) have been there for 2 months

maybe it depends on the quantity you send,I never have such long times,a couple of weeks max,because I send about a thousand contents in a year.
...

while i've had over 700 images accepted at SS over the last 2 months, i've limited my uploads to AS to 50-100 per week. I continued to upload in order to get in line for the long review times.

meanwhile i have only had a few rejections since the end of august but none approved since then either.

worse, the system still rejects ai-gen for lack of model release -- it just rejected a series sent a month ago - and when you click to re-submit, it shows it knows the image is ai-gen but now has an addtl box to click that says "people here are fictional" and even worser, after making the changes, and saving or submitting again (the prompts vary!) nothing happens - the image doesnt show up in 'new' or 'submitted'

[i've send a msg to suppoort]

yes now you have to check the box that states that the people are not real,so when you sent them there was no option to check the box and they were rejected?and then you couldn't even send them again...what a mess!

so the fact that you had few rejections until August and then none approved,confirms my weird theory that there is an increase in the rejection rate towards the end of the year,and that therefore the quantity uploaded affects rejections.

Dog-maDe-sign · « **Reply #80 on:** October 25, 2023, 16:10 »

Quote from: MatHayward on October 24, 2023, 11:15

Quote from: Dog-maDe-sign on October 23, 2023, 07:05
Hey Mat, don't you think Adobe should hire some new employees, with human intelligence, for real contents review?

I tried suggesting that, word for word. They pointed out that when they hired me, they were hoping for "human intelligence". Clearly, that didn't work out so this one was a swing and a miss. Thanks so much for the helpful suggestion though

Mat

Thumbs up for you, Mat
.g

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: review times?? (Read 19365 times)

cobalt

MatHayward

erik trikowich

cascoly

Injustice for all

Dog-maDe-sign

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors