1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray
« on: June 13, 2025, 23:03 »
Yeah, I'm on about the past few months... probably less than $0.10 to $0.15 when May and June are all wrapped up.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray« on: June 13, 2025, 23:03 »
Yeah, I'm on about the past few months... probably less than $0.10 to $0.15 when May and June are all wrapped up.
2
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray« on: June 13, 2025, 07:34 »
Historically, it worked out to about 50 cents per download for videos. Now they've finalised their exciting updates to how they calculate payouts... it seems more like 10 to 15 cents.
3
Adobe Stock / Re: Continuing their downgrading of contributor earnings, only $4 for each freebie« on: May 23, 2025, 22:04 »what sells are on there are mainly editorials of specific places/landmarks/businesses, as well as newsworthy content. Did you Photoshop out some people at the bottom left? 4
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS has closed my account after 3 years of inactivity« on: May 22, 2025, 05:19 »And why in the world would ANYONE continue to contribute to this agency when a buyer has to pay $79us for a single HD clip and the contributor "earns" pennies? This was the same agency that years ago promised "the more you contribute, the more you'll earn." An agency that, at the time, was paying contributors a minimum $23us for an HD clip. If that isn't worth legal action, I don't know what is... if the buyer is paying $79 for a clip, then you're not getting pennies. you're getting $8.85 to $71.60 depending on the resolution and your commission rate. You might want to figure out the details before you consider any legal action. 5
Pond5 / Re: My Pond5 Download Trend« on: May 16, 2025, 23:40 »You probably don't sell videos on iStock. Authors who sell know that for 99% of videos, authors receive from 2 to 9 dollars. Basically, the author receives less than 5 dollars.As for getty, this is not a classic stock. This stock sells videos at very low prices. If you meant iStock, you probably should have said iStock. But you didn't. And those prices do not only apply to exclusive content, but please, do continue guessing and making stuff up to support your position. We all love it when you do that. 6
Pond5 / Re: My Pond5 Download Trend« on: May 15, 2025, 03:51 »As for getty, this is not a classic stock. This stock sells videos at very low prices. Yeah, so cheap! Lol https://www.gettyimages.com/plans-and-pricing 7
General - Top Sites / Re: Envato/MotionArray graphics in stock footage?« on: March 28, 2025, 22:20 »
No
8
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray« on: March 13, 2025, 01:13 »
479 downloads so far... 1,173 last month. Estimated downloads for March based on current figures... pretty much exactly the same as February.
9
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray« on: February 12, 2025, 07:02 »
Artgrid is Israeli owned.
10
General Stock Discussion / Re: DeepSeek« on: February 01, 2025, 14:17 »
Always refreshing to read a different type of crazy every once in a while. A well earned respite from the stoker2014 show!
11
General Stock Discussion / Re: DeepSeek« on: January 31, 2025, 03:59 »
So it wasn't Taiwan leaving the UN?! Make your mind up!
12
General Stock Discussion / Re: DeepSeek« on: January 31, 2025, 00:15 »
So Republicans led to the emergence of the 'Chinese monster', as they were in power in 1971. Excellent... sounds like you're finally starting to understand. 13
Off Topic / Re: Worst First starts« on: January 28, 2025, 21:59 »
So... "Biden gave Russian Na.zi putin permission and the green light to occupy and genocide Ukraine" is a factual statement because... Biden said things to Putin, and nobody knows what things he said to Putin, but it's possible that one of the things he might have said to Putin is that 'you have the green light to occupy and genocide Ukraine'?!
I've heard it all now! So because Trump also said things to Putin that I don't know about, I can also make up absolutely anything and just present it as fact?! This is fun! Trump should be sent to the electric the chair because, not only did he give the green light to Putin to invade ukraine and commit genocide, he also signed an agreement to work with Russia to develop time travel technology so that the US and Russia could go back in time and eliminate every ukranian that ever existed. They'd then stop ukraine from ever being created in the first place, thus eliminating its very existence. It also came to light that trump absolutely despises stoker2014, an infamous member in some stock photography/video forum. He said that although he loves the poorly educated, stoker takes things too far, and portrays his fans in a bad light. trump was of the opinion that stoker might be a Biden plant to make him and his supporters look bad. How do I know all this? Well, trump and Putin have had a bunch of phone calls and meetings over the years, and although I don't know everything they spoke about, they probabaly said all that stuff at some point. So it must be true. 14
Off Topic / Re: Worst First starts« on: January 26, 2025, 02:21 »You just don't know that World War III has been going on for 10 years. They didn't tell you that on your local TV. It's considerably closer to 11 years than it is 10... maybe they didn't tell you that on your local TV. 15
Off Topic / Re: Worst First starts« on: January 24, 2025, 21:16 »
So... answering a question in the off topic section is fine, but answering a question in the off topic section by providing a source for your statements... is off topic?!
16
Off Topic / Re: Worst First starts« on: January 24, 2025, 12:50 »SpaceStockFootage, I don't respond to nonsense and trolling. Especially since I have no desire to engage in your education. Yeah, it showed that a slight majority of the country would prefer Trump as their next president. That's pretty much it. For some completely insane reason, you seem to think it showed that all Americans want Joe Biden to be sent to the electric chair. 17
Off Topic / Re: Worst First starts« on: January 24, 2025, 05:19 »1. Support for the flow of illegals into the US.Be specific.which progressives have ever supported violent offenders? evidence pleaseThe evidence is the entire policy of Biden and the Democrats over the past 4 years. 1. Support for the flow of illegals into the US. What support? 2. No deportation policy. Well they seemed to do pretty well without a policy... deporting more than Trump 3. Friendship with totalitarian china. Define friendship? What exactly did Biden do that Trump didn't, and vice versa... that somehow indicated friendship? 4. Lifting sanctions against terrorist iran. Biden implemented more sanctions against Iran than Trump. 5. Inviting putin to attack Ukraine. Biden, even before the full-scale Russian invasion, said many times that russia would not be punished for genocide and the murder of Ukrainians. How did he 'invite' Putin to attack Ukraine?! I'd be very surprised if he ever said ''russia would not be punished for genocide and the murder of Ukrainians". You got a link for that quote? 6. Ineffective sanctions against Russians. What would you suggest? What additional sanctions will Trump be implementing? 7. Failure to supply Ukraine with the necessary weapons. What obligation does he have to supply Ukraine with any weapons? Has Ukraine supplied necessary weapons to Isreal and/or Palestine? If not, should Zelenskyy go to the electric chair? If not, why not? 8. As a result, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians were killed. Did Biden kill them? Surely if they had sufficient weapons already then it wouldn't matter... so they don't have sufficient weapons. Which, logically, means that no world leader has provided sufficient weapons to Ukraine? So do they all need to be executed? Every world leader? Does the fact that Zelenskyy didn't have sufficient weapons in the first place mean that he should be executed? 9. No policy aimed at terrorists in north korea. You sure about that? Does Trump have a policy aimed at terrorists in North Korea? Did he? Or was it just the odd meeting, handshake, pat on the back, telling the media how much they love each other and then back to business as usual? 10. No fight against drug cartels that import deadly fentanyl-based drugs into the US. None? So the DEA just sit around playing minesweeper and solitaire in the office all day? The amount of fentanyl seizures doubled under Biden. I'll ask again... where do you get your 'news' or so called 'facts' from? Is it some crazy Facebook group or weird Youtube channel with the word 'truth' in the name? Do they intersperse their lies with the occasional flat earth and anti-science content? 18
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock video maximum file sizes on different agencies« on: January 22, 2025, 11:03 »
ProRes codecs are all mov files. Unless they're MXF files, but that's not really something to worry about when it comes to stock. H.264 codecs can be MP4 or mov files. Or mkv, but that's not all that common a format for the stock agencies.
19
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shuterstock about to get eaten by Getty« on: January 08, 2025, 08:39 »I see that Getty is acquiring Shuterstock, which means that the Shuterstock board is selling their company. The merger name is nonsense, the letter clearly states that Getty will control everything. It's a merger. The letter doesn't clearly state that Getty will control everything. If the Shutterstock board were selling their company, then Shutterstock shareholders wouldn't own 45.3% of the shares of the new company after the merger... and there wouldn't be six Shutterstock board members on the board of the new company. Sure, Getty is getting the better end of the stick, but they're worth more so it makes sense. But hey, just make stuff up as you see fit... it's what we've come to expect by now, and we wouldn't have it any other way. It's a refreshing reprieve from reality. 20
General Stock Discussion / Re: Getty Images and Shutterstock are reportedly "exploring a merger"« on: January 03, 2025, 23:00 »
So Getty, Shutterstock, Pond 5, and Envato (plus all the other smaller agencies that Getty, Shutterstock, Pond 5 and Envato have bought out over the years) all owned by one company?! Cray cray! Give it 5 years and they'll be bought by Disney or Amazon!
21
Off Topic / Re: Movie Juror No. 2« on: January 03, 2025, 22:27 »
I thought the acting was good and the overall production value was excellent, but the plot was obviously a cunning ploy to elicit sympathy for Ukraine, perpetrated by Donald Trump and JFK Jr.
Why else would Fauci try and get it banned? I mean it's set in 'Georgia' for crying out loud... could they be any more obvious? And I have a friend who works in a movie theatre and she saw the manager talking to some guy in a black suit and shades handing him a package, then I saw the manager sprinkling some powder on all the popcorn and he told all the staff to keep their mouths shut. When all the customers left they had kind of blank looks on their faces, which is common with mind control drugs. Need I say any more? 22
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray« on: January 02, 2025, 01:20 »The owners of motionarray (an isralie company) seem to be about lying, and thieving. They "demanded" people agree to a new contract, "promising" more sales (but in essence were licensing content cheap, selling "ai" data), now they talk about stealing more money from people... So just like the majority of every other stock site who's done exactly the same? Apart from the promising more sales part... pretty sure none of them have ever done that. 23
Pond5 / Re: Pond5 he is definitely dead« on: November 11, 2024, 23:19 »I never get 40% commission anymore, it's turned into a myth. Just imagine you get 40% of the Net License Revenue rather than the list price... and you'll almost always get 40% commission! 24
Pond5 / Re: Pond5 he is definitely dead« on: November 01, 2024, 04:39 »
Last month was my best month on Pond5 since October 2022.
25
DepositPhotos / Re: PNG files« on: October 28, 2024, 22:53 »
It's pretty standard when they introduce something new...wait until there's plenty to choose from before announcing it. If they added a png filter straight away, then people would be a bit disappointed if they only got 1, 10 or 100 images to choose from.
|
Submit Your Vote
|