Quote from: Stu49 on December 14, 2010, 12:20
can we have Alamy on the list pls ?? now they accept smaller images !
+1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Stu49 on December 14, 2010, 12:20
can we have Alamy on the list pls ?? now they accept smaller images !
Quote from: sharpshot on November 02, 2010, 12:26
I uploaded some over 10 days ago but they are all stuck in "Images without metadata". I can see the titles and keywords, they're OK with all the other sites, so what's gone wrong?
Quote from: tamasvargyasi on October 11, 2010, 16:57
Just two minutes ago I`ve got in. Hope it worth the wait.
Quote from: louoates on May 28, 2010, 22:02
Is Yay still in business?
260 of my best = 0 sales this year.

Quote from: Michael on April 17, 2010, 21:32Quote from: franky242 on April 15, 2010, 17:24
Hey, I am happy to inform you that my first images got accepted by Polylooks and I even got the payments for those credited to my Zoonar account - unfortunately the acceptance ratio was not ideal:
I started uploading the images to Zoonar on Wednesday and applied for approval of the accepted ones on Polylooks this morning (CET).
The images carried an "applying for Polylooks" icon in the images managing section of Zoonar.
Now when I just checked my Zoonar account, I saw that some of them were accepted by Polylooks, the photos now carry either an "accepted" or "rejected by Polylooks" icon - having said that I need to mention that the approval rate is not that excessive - I am rather new in microstock with only a limited portfolio but the approval rate of Zoonar was much lower as with DepositPhotos for example and out of those Polylooks again only accepted about 70% (although the initial announcement to me sounded like almost all photos accepted by Zoonar will make it to Polylooks) so that my ROI is much worse as with the same images on DepositPhotos unfortunately, about 40%!
Hope others out there are performing better!
Sorry i overlookes your question, we have many to do now... My opinion for this is: It doesn`t help you when agencys took photos with mistakes. If costumers buy thoose pictures they will be unhappy and never come back. It`s better for you when stock agencys took a closer look to your photos. The mistakes they are mostly causes deletions are: artefacts in blue skys, objective spots, unscharpness or unattractive photo design.
Quote from: stockastic on March 21, 2010, 16:57
They're all trying to raise their standards, but that's not as simple (or cheap) as it sounds, and they're trying to do it in a rush. So the numbers of goofy, inconsistent rejections are shooting up. Somehow we need to get to a point where rejections are consistent and the reasons are made clear to the contributor. Style and content are up to the individual agency, but standards for things like noise, "artifacts", white balance, focus and isolation could and should, I think, be roughly same everywhere. That's a long ways off I think.
Quote from: Magnum on March 20, 2010, 15:34
Quality should be ok if Istock approved them. Could be "no commercial" or something like that. What was it?
Thanks...
Quote from: jareso on March 20, 2010, 06:58
Had someone photo sales there already?
Quote from: holgs on February 08, 2010, 11:47Quote from: FD-amateur on February 06, 2010, 00:42Quote from: lisafx on February 05, 2010, 23:48I don't know why. Care to elaborate?You've got mail.
I'm sure a lot of us don't know why.