pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pixel8

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12
126
DepositPhotos / Re: im disappointed with DP
« on: April 09, 2015, 16:13 »
i konw DP is a bad agency ( a still upload there because the allow me download all my images )

but the have a really bad contributor relation policy, i just ask a simple question via chat "Please can you tell me the list of all your partners"

the tell me "I will need to check this. Can I get back to you via email within 48 hours?"   

today finally i received my email

"Unfortunately, I cannot give you the list of the partner sites that we work with though, if you wish, your images can be excluded from all the partner sales."


why all this secret ? why i can't know where my photos was ? ( of course i opt-out the partner program )
Where do you opt out at I can't find where that is on my account?

127
PhotoDune / Re: 10% approval rate
« on: April 09, 2015, 13:25 »
Photodune = Envato

So Envato Owns Photodune? Are they are two separate sites or is it the same site with two different domain names? If Envato is a 7 on low earners is Photodune also or are they like SS owning Bigstock in which case Photodune cant even rank on the earning ratings?

128
General - Top Sites / Re: iStock and Shutterstock web traffic
« on: April 09, 2015, 12:44 »
I've been keeping track of the agency numbers about once a month since March. I looked at the numbers today and here are those, plus the ones from Nov 14th. First number is global/second US (or other highest country and I've noted which)

Nov 14 2014

IS 524 / 528
SS  224 / 272
Thinkstock 5,395  / 1,731
Getty 2,533  / 1,039
Fotolia  671 / (DE) 144 (FR) 327 (US) 2,760
dreamstime 768 / 1,052
123rf 729 / 1,216
DepositPhotos 1,211 / 1,999
PhotoDune  3,208 / 4,506
Canstock  4,306 / 4,299
Alamy  12,643 / (GB) 2,910 (US) 16,936
DollarPhotoClub  2,429 / 1,966
Canva  2,151  /  933


Dec 4 2014

IS 600 /602
SS  238 /320
Thinkstock 5,736  / 2,155
Getty 2,712  / 1,128
Fotolia  794 / (DE) 160 (FR) 344 (US) 2,7923
dreamstime 811 / 1,119
123rf 810 / 1,368
DepositPhotos 1,346 / 2,044
PhotoDune  3,814 / 4,506
Canstock  4,306 / 4,758
Alamy  14,047 / (GB) 3,165 (US) 19,953
DollarPhotoClub  2,697 / 2,071
Canva  2,082  /  909

As a percentage, iStock's drop is about twice that of SS. The only site whose ranking has improved is Canva - everyone else has lost ground with some (like Alamy) seeing big drops. Even the toxic Dollar Photo Club, which had seen improving stats for a few months has been dropping off too.

I don't know what any of this really means, but I think whatever errors there are probably affect all the sites roughly similarly.

Just wondering about ThinkStock as it seems to have high Traffic according to your numbers but does not seem to pay well as its not even listed in the Low Earners, why do you think that is?

129
Lighting 101 !!!  Seriously!

Sorry, but I'm really tired of people who know nothing about photography and yet they get accepted by stock "agencies". 



Everyone has to start somewhere.
If you search long enough you'll find a forum post from Yuri asking how to embed metadata into a photo.

That was many years ago, when amateurs and people who knew nothing about photography had a chance to succeed in this business. 

I understand you need new members for MSG (many of the old ones have gone), but honestly, are you happy with all these wannabe photographers flooding good work with their crappy and copycat images?


You don't know my portfolio!

You mean this portfolio http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-1451831p1.html ? Or this one http://www.dreamstime.com/pixelrobot_info ?    ::)
Mostly copycat photos!


Sounds to me that you are a disgruntle person who does not like any competition, someone else takes a photo of an ordinary everyday object and you feel you should be the only one to photograph it! Let me guess you were the first person to photograph a pencil from the top view or maybe it was the angle view and since there are only so many ways to photograph a simple object your feathers are all ruffled because many other photographers realize the same thing and take a picture of a pencil from similar angles.

Congratulations on your very original angles!  Wish you could also have original concepts.  These images (among others) from your portfolio are nothing but a copy of very successful images from an iStock exclusive. http://www.shutterstock.com/portfolio/search.mhtml?searchterm=news+headline&x=0&y=0&media_type=images&search_cat=&searchtermx=&people_gender=&people_age=&people_ethnicity=&people_number=&color=&lang=en&search_source=search_form&version=llv1&anyorall=all&safesearch=1&submitter=1451831&photographer_name=Mega+Pixel&search_group=&orient=&commercial_ok=&show_color_wheel=1&sort_method=popular
And no, they are not mine  ;)


Well post the similar stock exclusive! Because I know when I made those headlines for my newspaper that I sat around thinking of what to put on them, I don't need to look at someones else's photo to think up a headline.

I am interested in seeing your portfolio to see how many copycat photos you have, as if you have nothing but all original ideas that no one has ever done?

But I am guessing you are afraid what will be revealed when you do.

Also I don't think a stack of newspapers, a rolled newspaper, folded newspaper etc is an original concept, those are pretty basic and common things.

130
Lighting 101 !!!  Seriously!

Sorry, but I'm really tired of people who know nothing about photography and yet they get accepted by stock "agencies". 



Everyone has to start somewhere.
If you search long enough you'll find a forum post from Yuri asking how to embed metadata into a photo.

That was many years ago, when amateurs and people who knew nothing about photography had a chance to succeed in this business. 

I understand you need new members for MSG (many of the old ones have gone), but honestly, are you happy with all these wannabe photographers flooding good work with their crappy and copycat images?


You don't know my portfolio!

You mean this portfolio http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-1451831p1.html ? Or this one http://www.dreamstime.com/pixelrobot_info ?    ::)
Mostly copycat photos!


Sounds to me that you are a disgruntle person who does not like any competition, someone else takes a photo of an ordinary everyday object and you feel you should be the only one to photograph it! Let me guess you were the first person to photograph a pencil from the top view or maybe it was the angle view and since there are only so many ways to photograph a simple object your feathers are all ruffled because many other photographers realize the same thing and take a picture of a pencil from similar angles.

Please post your portfolio and lets compare!

131
I found part 1 and 2 of this tutorial very useful. Even if you aren't working on people-sized subjects in a large (ish) room, the principles are the same. Light the back ground and foreground separately. Distance between the two (or flagging) makes the job easier. Cleanup in post tends to be very easy if done correctly.

http://zackarias.com/for-photographers/photo-resources/white-seamless-tutorial-part-1-gear-space/


Yep, My problem I think is that my studio space is too small as I don't have allot of room to place between the object and the backdrop so when I flag its still bouncing back onto my object thus making it harder to get that pure white background and so I end up doing it in Photoshop.

132
I have never received a 1099-k from Paypal yet all my earnings are sent to my Paypal account. So you are saying that your 1099 from the various stock agencies are not enough to show the IRS where your income is coming from? How is a 1099-k different from a regular 1099? Isn't Paypal Considered a Banking Institution?

You don't make more than $20k or have more than 200 transactions through Paypal, so you don't have to worry about it.

Hmm but I will this year so I am worried about it! And I did make more than 20K so I never got a 1099K from PayPal.

133
I have never received a 1099-k from Paypal yet all my earnings are sent to my Paypal account. So you are saying that your 1099 from the various stock agencies are not enough to show the IRS where your income is coming from? How is a 1099-k different from a regular 1099? Isn't Paypal Considered a Banking Institution?

Maybe the solution is to just submit the 1099K and not your other 1099's or start having the stock agencies mail you a check to cancel out Paypal as the Third Party?

134
Lighting 101 !!!  Seriously!

Sorry, but I'm really tired of people who know nothing about photography and yet they get accepted by stock "agencies". 


Everyone has to start somewhere.
If you search long enough you'll find a forum post from Yuri asking how to embed metadata into a photo.
That was many years ago, when amateurs and people who knew nothing about photography had a chance to succeed in this business. 

I understand you need new members for MSG (many of the old ones have gone), but honestly, are you happy with all these wannabe photographers flooding good work with their crappy and copycat images?

You don't know my portfolio!

135
General Stock Discussion / Re: Tethering Question?
« on: March 26, 2015, 22:25 »
You can always measure the white value in Lightroom and go by the numbers. It's the best way to see if your whites are maxed out.
Good Point I never thought of that!

136
General Stock Discussion / Re: Tethering Question?
« on: March 26, 2015, 17:05 »
Forget the histogram, just look at the photo. Do you have blown out whites or not, if not, then you are good to go, regardless of what the histogram tells you. And if you shoot RAW the white parts are often not blown out at all and still contain enough detail.

Yeah I always shoot raw, the reason I am concerned with the Histogram is that I want solid pure white when doing an isolation so if the camera is saying yes I am blown out but then Lightroom is not then I am not sure which one is right.

137
I got these a while back and they really helped me out-  I know nothing about lighting at the time (2011)

http://www.amazon.com/DVD-Strobist-Lighting-Layers-David/dp/B004YG7JPK


Thanks

138
Lighting 101 !!!  Seriously!

Sorry, but I'm really tired of people who know nothing about photography and yet they get accepted by stock "agencies".

Im self taught and we all have to start somewhere, so why so harsh I'm sure you knew nothing too in the beginning!

139
General Stock Discussion / Tethering Question?
« on: March 26, 2015, 13:53 »
I have a lot of questions today!

When I tether from camera to computer when in the studio My histogram on my camera does not match the histogram in Lightroom. So my camera will show that I have blown out the white background when photographing an isolated object but in Lightroom it does not show it as blown out, how can I fix this problem so that the camera and Lightroom have the same histogram results?

Thanks

140
Flag?

Yep, I have tried flagging so for instance, I have my object on the table with my white paper backdrop  but the object is only maybe 2 feet or less from the backdrop. and so if I use a flag the light hits the white backdrop and then bounces toward the object and camera.

Is there a certain way to light the backdrop in terms of light angle with inclusion of a flag? Maybe my angle of the lighting needs to be more from the side?

141
Just wondering what is the best way to get pure white when isolating an object in studio? Currently I take my photos into Photoshop and use the pen tool to create a path and take the background to pure white with a grey scale shadow.

However days of editing each photo is taking its toll on my mouse hand. I have tried blowing out the background with a strobe but the light reflects back onto the object and creates all sorts of problems.

So I assume that I need to increase the distance from my backdrop to the object to cut down the reflective light from blowing out the backdrop, My question is not only will that work but in general about how far does the object need to be from the backdrop so that the reflective light won't be a problem?

Thanks

142
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock Photography in Seattle
« on: March 26, 2015, 13:07 »
You really should look at what you need and then go from there.  Buying more equipment, renting a studio, and moving to a new location might make sense or you might just be spending a whole lot of money for no reason.  The best thing to do is evaluate your needs and then decide what makes sense.  So far you haven't really said what you want or why you want it.  Where do you live now that doesn't have people, locations, garages or studios?  Why are you trying to figure out what size studio you should get without figuring out what shots you want first?  Why do you think you need to move in the first place, what do you expect to get out of being in Seattle, Charlotte, or Atlanta that you don't already have?  You can spend a ton of money on these things first and then figure out how to use it later but I think you'll end up losing a lot of money.

SoCal was to expensive so we have temporally moved to Spokane Wa to live with Family as we seek out a mayor city to live around that we can afford. I feel that a bigger city has more to offer in terms of models, backdrops, other professionals in the industry as well as access to more stuff needed to photograph.

So far I have only done objects in studio however I want to start taking pictures of people in various settings including in a staged studio setting so I need a larger studio then just a room in a house.

143
General Stock Discussion / Stock Photography in Seattle
« on: March 26, 2015, 11:44 »
Just curious if anyone lives and does stock photography in and around Seattle WA. If so what kind of challenges do you face with weather or other things a fellow stock photographer would want to be aware of in the area such as drive time, parking, or whatever? I am looking for large cities in the USA to move to and I am considering Seattle.

Thanks

144
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 26, 2015, 11:26 »
I have a fairly large studio and I use Alien Bees lighting.  I shoot pure white backdrops frequently using two B800 units set very close to the white vinyl backdrop.  Often I will use a B1600 for a key light (and a large octobox) and another B800 for fill (usually a medium softbox).  I usually meter for around f11 on the subject.  If the backdrop lights are turned up all the way that will usually blow the background out to pure white without it spilling back on the subject (at f16+).  You need some space, though because the subject can't be too close to the backdrop. 

More artistic lighting scenarios require anywhere from one to five lights for me.  I don't generally use the 6th light even though I have one.

My studio was too small at first (I'd say 13 feet by 17 feet) but I was able to knock down a wall to more than double the work space.  Now I have enough to do two lighting setups simultaneously which is a great time savings when you are paying a model by the hour.

I am fortunate to have been able to buy my own commercial building (it's an investment).  I did a lot of the remodeling work myself and it's really nice inside now.  Unfortunately to be able to afford to buy I had to purchase in an outlying area so it's a 35 minute drive from my house.

If you like, you can see my studio here: http://www.chriscurtisphotography.com/?page_id=304


Very Nice! So you mentioned having two Lighting set ups, how do you plan that out, speaking form no experience I just imagined that I would have some ideas in mind and have the models try the ideas and also just do things on the fly which would mean also figuring out lighting on the fly. Are you saying that you already have the lighting all set up exactly how you want it before the model shows up?

So are you making your living from photography? It looks like from your website that you do mostly Portraiture for people who walk in? Or are you making your living from Stock Photography or Both?


Yes, when I hire a model, it's for a specific concept.  I plan what I'm going to shoot and how I'm going to light it in advance.  Then I go to the studio the day before and set up the lighting  and the set.  Then when the model shows up, there are just tweaks to make.

Model time is expensive and I want to get the most shots possible so I do a lot of prep.

I don't make my living from photography currently.  Doing stock part time pays for all my equipment.  It also pays the costs to hire models or travel around to do art projects just for myself that isn't intended for stock.  But I'm not going to  be quitting the day job any time soon.


Well I think you will be full time in the future for sure looks like you are on your way.

145
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 26, 2015, 11:25 »
If you talk about a simple studio in the means of: strobes+light+softboxes+reflectors+background+lotsofspaceinbetween then I would go as well for the rental studios. Never had a problem to find one anywhere in the world.

In my case I set up a huge space with different sets of furniture etc. since I produce mostly lifestyle and it is cheaper than finding spaces with property releases and paying per hour etc.

Thanks that is the kind of experience I am talking about, finding a spot, having a limited time frame and getting a property release plus paying per hour, there are a lot of possible complications there. So either converting a garage or renting a spot month to month or yearly sounds like a good option as I also want to start doing lifestyle and business settings.

146
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 26, 2015, 02:35 »
I have a fairly large studio and I use Alien Bees lighting.  I shoot pure white backdrops frequently using two B800 units set very close to the white vinyl backdrop.  Often I will use a B1600 for a key light (and a large octobox) and another B800 for fill (usually a medium softbox).  I usually meter for around f11 on the subject.  If the backdrop lights are turned up all the way that will usually blow the background out to pure white without it spilling back on the subject (at f16+).  You need some space, though because the subject can't be too close to the backdrop. 

More artistic lighting scenarios require anywhere from one to five lights for me.  I don't generally use the 6th light even though I have one.

My studio was too small at first (I'd say 13 feet by 17 feet) but I was able to knock down a wall to more than double the work space.  Now I have enough to do two lighting setups simultaneously which is a great time savings when you are paying a model by the hour.

I am fortunate to have been able to buy my own commercial building (it's an investment).  I did a lot of the remodeling work myself and it's really nice inside now.  Unfortunately to be able to afford to buy I had to purchase in an outlying area so it's a 35 minute drive from my house.

If you like, you can see my studio here: http://www.chriscurtisphotography.com/?page_id=304


Very Nice! So you mentioned having two Lighting set ups, how do you plan that out, speaking form no experience I just imagined that I would have some ideas in mind and have the models try the ideas and also just do things on the fly which would mean also figuring out lighting on the fly. Are you saying that you already have the lighting all set up exactly how you want it before the model shows up?

So are you making your living from photography? It looks like from your website that you do mostly Portraiture for people who walk in? Or are you making your living from Stock Photography or Both?

147
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 25, 2015, 23:04 »
Depends.  If you want to blow out a white background to 255 with full length models you are going to need four flashes just for the background - you won't get an even 255 white background with just two lights as they won't cover the entire wall.  You might get away with just one light for front side lighting but then the hair will likely look dull - most pros will use an overhead light to add sheen to hair.  Also one front light might not give an even light full length - you can imagine the need to have two flashes one above the other to give even lighting full length.  You can try to do it all with just three units but you're going to have problems with uneven lighting, inability to blow out the background completely, and possibly inability to fully light a standing subject from the front.

640W units might be enough, but bear in mind the square multiplying factor of distance - if your current units give you F11 shooting small to medium size objects in a home studio situation, those same units might only give you F5.6 when you move them back a few feet to light a person.

Thanks Hatman, looks like I'm going to need to buy some more gear!

148
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 25, 2015, 21:11 »
Find a large commercial space that will rent by the day - community halls, office buildings, libraries with meeting, presentation rooms etc, preferably a place with at least one large white wall.  Bear in mind that you might require much more powerful studio lighting - those that work well for objects at home may not have enough power in a full length setting.  To get the best result you are going to have to spend some money.

Currently I have three Einstein E640 Flash Units, do you think these are powerful enough and if not do you have any suggestions?
 
I have one 60" Octabox a 37 In Octabox and two small rectangle soft boxes. Any suggestions on anything else I might need starting out.

149
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 25, 2015, 19:12 »
It would seem like a bad idea to go rent some large space for several hundred dollars a month just starting out until you have gained experience and got good at taking photos with people in settings.
Sounds like you have your answer already.  I'm inferring that you are pretty new to this.  I think the best advice is to figure out your needs and then look for a solution that works.  Going out and renting a studio space is probably not the best plan for you.  What equipment do you have?  Do you want a cyc wall?  Lots of lights and big softboxes?  Are you looking for a cheap option or one that will make your work faster and easier to setup?  What's your budget?  Once you start answering some of these questions you can narrow your focus.  It doesn't really matter what other people are doing, different people value different things and have different needs.

You are also asking how far is it reasonable for a model to travel, the answer probably is it depends how much you are paying.  Models go all over the world for shoots but if you aren't paying them anything then you can't reasonably expect them to go very far.

I have some studio equipment already and have been working out of my home as a studio photographing objects, but with people I am going to need more space. Thats why I am wondering what others are doing and if they have faced similar challenges and what they did to solve their space problem. I obviously could convert the garage but before I do I wanted to hear from others who have done that and if it worked out or if they found themselves needing more space. Or if they rented a commercial space and what is a reasonable price for something like that or if they rented  a space and what unforeseen things may have happened because of it? Even though I am new to photographing people I am willing to jump in if it seems plausible for renting a space. My other thought was to enroll in a college photography class and use the university studios and weather anyone had tried that and how that worked out?

150
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 25, 2015, 11:50 »
Maybe give some more info.  Budget, what you plan to use the space for, how much will you use it, where are you located, what kind of equipment do you want to use, etc...  There are lots of solutions depending what problems you want solved.  If you just want waist up portraits a spare room will work, full body a garage would probably be better, multiple people on a set you need something larger, real looking locations you would probably want to rent that space.

Do office buildings rent spaces on a short term basis?

I am wanting to transition from taking pictures of objects to taking pictures of one or more people interacting with various stuff. I have watched videos on other photographers demonstrating what they do and they all seem to have pretty large studio spaces so I am trying to figure out something that will be large enough and affordable starting out. Also what is a reasonable distance for a model to travel. I guess I am trying to find out if there is a industry standard on how most photographers operate in terms of location to a big city and if it is considered unprofessional to work out of your garage when working with models and if anyone has any pointers from their own journey and experience in this process as everyone has to start somewhere?

It would seem like a bad idea to go rent some large space for several hundred dollars a month just starting out until you have gained experience and got good at taking photos with people in settings.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors