151
Dreamstime.com / Re: More than usual rejections from Dreamtime
« on: December 19, 2009, 14:55 »
ahhh...i see your point...i've been blind to my ways

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
Dreamstime.com / Re: More than usual rejections from Dreamtime« on: December 19, 2009, 14:55 »
ahhh...i see your point...i've been blind to my ways
![]() 152
General Stock Discussion / Re: When will you stop uploading for Christmas?« on: December 11, 2009, 09:05 »
I have 2 web site projects that I will be designing / building over the holidays, so i will actually be BUYING images during that time
![]() 153
New Sites - General / Re: photocase.com« on: December 08, 2009, 17:40 »
i tried 2 of my best / artistic images...1 at a time with 2 weeks in between...both shot down. Not wasting any more time with them...life's short.
154
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Trouble Logging Into Istock« on: December 03, 2009, 22:01 »
error...refresh...ok
155
Site Related / Re: Welcome to the new server.« on: December 03, 2009, 08:39 »
...runs faster for me...thx
perhaps you could school some of the stock sites on how to execute a smooth migration! ![]() 156
New Sites - General / Re: The 3D Studio - anyway selling there?« on: December 01, 2009, 19:33 »Anon...as already mentioned, the 20% if an affiliate commission if you refer a buyer to us. If you refer a seller then you get 5% as a referral fee for life. Our standard royalty rate for a sale is 60%...it goes as high as 70% if you join our non-exclusive loyalty program. and you are right, it's very confusing and our page layout there is crap. It's all changing soon thoughthx for the clarification...as i said, i'll be uploading ![]() 157
New Sites - General / Re: The 3D Studio - anyway selling there?« on: December 01, 2009, 17:49 »Okay..started to test the waters and upload a portion of my port, then i saw that you're only offering 20% for stock (at which point i declined to upload). What about a higher payout since you're new to this arena? I see...my bad. Shall give them a whirl Thx 158
New Sites - General / Re: The 3D Studio - anyway selling there?« on: December 01, 2009, 17:38 »Okay..started to test the waters and upload a portion of my port, then i saw that you're only offering 20% for stock (at which point i declined to upload). What about a higher payout since you're new to this arena? not what it says on my page: Active - Affiliate ID: xxxxxx Members referred: 0 Commission sales rate: 20% EDIT: so is the 20% your "referal" percentage"? 159
New Sites - General / Re: photocase.com« on: December 01, 2009, 17:36 »
uploaded 5 good sellers, 5 rejected...not going to bother - life is short. Plus, go look at their collection - fairly shallow and fairly poor quality....don't get what they're trying to do and too busy to take the time to figure it out.
*steps off soapbox* 160
New Sites - General / Re: The 3D Studio - anyway selling there?« on: December 01, 2009, 17:32 »Magnum, thank you!Okay..started to test the waters and upload a portion of my port, then i saw that you're only offering 20% for stock (at which point i declined to upload). What about a higher payout since you're new to this arena? 162
StockXpert.com / Re: Ouch ! Long review and then near total rejection« on: November 27, 2009, 11:16 »Very strange... Things are just about the same as they've always been there for me. There was a stretch where review times got a bit long, but lately, less than a week seems to be the norm. No more rejections than usual, either.Review times have been running 1-2 weeks for me. That said, I've (almost) always had large % rejections when i submit in bulk (this has been the case for the last 2 years). However, when I submit in small batches (2-5), the rejection % seems to be much lower. Sales have been steady regardless (knock on wood). 163
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Forced account termination« on: November 23, 2009, 09:58 »
ugh...
while they have the right to do whatever they want on their site, it has always amazed me how certain stock sites are more than willing to cut their noses off to spite their face. I would really like to know what you said that got you cut off. bad move on their part - they should have just ignored you - instead, some bruised ego gave you the boot...shame on them. shades of fotolia. 164
123RF / trouble uploading to 123« on: November 23, 2009, 09:23 »
for the last 2 days, either my uploads do not appear or the descriptions and keywords won't stick...anyone else?
165
Mostphotos.com / Re: Who has had sales at MostPhotos?« on: November 02, 2009, 08:47 »
no sales since the new site launch. the browser compatibility issue can't be helping. i can find all of my images through the search but when you go to "portfolio", there's only 9 photos. prior to the site change, none of these problems existed (and i had sales)..ugh
166
General Stock Discussion / Re: Skin issue« on: October 20, 2009, 22:44 »Pay more and get better modelsheh heh...I looked at his stuff and the few model phots that i saw looked fine (quality and subject). From my experience, take what you're shooting, make the best of it, and it will match someone's needs. The "super-perfect" shots are a dime-a-dozen...not everybody is looking for the flawless model...sometimes the "real" look is what the client is searching for. ...carry on illstudio, you'll figure it out : ) 167
General Stock Discussion / Re: Skin issue« on: October 20, 2009, 14:42 »
try using the clone tool on just the areas you want to correct.
168
Veer / Re: Veer, the new Crestock?« on: October 18, 2009, 15:54 »ditto 169
Adobe Stock / Re: acceptance and few min later rejection?« on: October 18, 2009, 15:50 »
welcome to the forum...and welcome to the wonderful world of Fotolia, where questioning will get you banned and approvals are run by the monkey house at the zoo....all that being said, I've had 2 cashouts this month. Fortunately, a modest port from the last 3 years provides a consistant (and growing) payout. It may be too late to begin working with them as they are no longer accepting new material
![]() 170
ScandinavianStockPhoto.com / Re: scanstock gone?« on: October 13, 2009, 16:36 »btw, anyone any sales there recently ?I hit F5 and it comes up...weird. Averaging 1 - 2 sales per month...nothing exciting, just hoping they get bought by Getty or Corbis ![]() 171
ScandinavianStockPhoto.com / scanstock gone?« on: October 13, 2009, 15:30 »
Scanstock is not resolving when I go there...anybody else unable to hit it?
www.scanstockphoto.com Thx 172
New Sites - General / Re: New SWISS Stock« on: October 06, 2009, 21:41 »OgR...shoot the people on this forum straight and they "might" be nicer...and from a simple marketing perspective, DON'T start soliciting a project until there is something to show...I`m wasn't trying to post any commercial about this stock, i just want to shear information that i have with all of u!!! most of the folks here are way more savy than you and i combined (hope i'm not insulting anyone on any level with that). Biggles 173
Microstock Services / Re: Microstocksolutions« on: October 06, 2009, 11:08 »From Dreamstime to Fotolia, all of the major microstock agencies have someone on staff or on contract who regularly come here and to other similar sites.Perhaps this might explain the "unusual" rejections that FT and DT have been handing out as of late ![]() 174
General Stock Discussion / Re: images accepted, sold, then rejected« on: October 03, 2009, 15:50 »
if the images had not sold in that window, it might not concern me. But when they start removing images that are quickly generating income (for BOTH of us), I fail to see any business logic... oh well..it IS an unusual business : )
175
General Stock Discussion / Re: What if someone joins for exclusive and send refused images to other agencie« on: October 02, 2009, 16:04 »That percentage seems a little higher in my field advertising.haha...ditto...me thinks 25%-30% with another 25% straddling the fence ![]() |
|