pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Gregor909

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9
176
StockXpert.com / Re: Rate/Comment/View the Image Above Yours!
« on: February 23, 2008, 20:10 »
Rated and commented even if it will be discontinued

Next one, it can't hurt

http://www.stockxpert.com/browse.phtml?f=view&id=8742732

If anybody could give me the link to the tread about ratings, it would be appreciated. I didn't find it anywhere on the StockXpert forum...



Rated and commented!
Yeah I can remember reading somewhere that the rating system will be discontinued, but I can't remember where!
But anyway... it still works so here's mine:
http://www.stockxpert.com/browse.phtml?f=view&id=10187762


177
iStockPhoto.com / Re: image stolen Flickr and sold on Istock !
« on: February 09, 2008, 21:49 »
Quote from Rebekka Guleifsdttir:
Quote
"I mean for crying out loud, out of 31 images this particular user has on his 'portfolio,' 25 of them are mine, and at least 3 are of me," she said in the caption for a screenshot of the iStockphoto page.
So than I wonder.....how did the thief get the model release?

178
Panthermedia.net / Re: Panthermedia goes International
« on: February 02, 2008, 11:21 »
They don't sell vector as EPS?
Anybody knows they have plans to change this?

179
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Considering Closing Account in 2008
« on: January 12, 2008, 18:22 »
I may be wrong, but if you close your account with some of these microstock agencies then don't they reserve the right to still sell your images? So if you close your account with an agency then you are letting them sell your images and keep all of the money. Maybe it's just certain agencies. I think that Zazzle.com operates that way.
I think that's unusual. Closing an account means no portfolio for most agencies! With RF you always own the rights.

180
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Canon 100mm Macro!
« on: January 12, 2008, 17:59 »
Nice shots indeed, Gregor909!

I feel compelled to say that the reason you aren't selling them is that your keywording is remarkably lacking.
Thanks. Yeah maybe you right, I'm neglecting my photo's a bit lately, because vectors sell better! But I think I will edit those keywords anyway!

181
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Canon 100mm Macro!
« on: January 11, 2008, 10:26 »
Thanks!  :)

183
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Canon 100mm Macro!
« on: January 07, 2008, 00:15 »
It's the only decent lens I have. I even have landscape photo's in my portfolio!  :)

184
I shoot food images and cooks wear hats. so no need for me to isolate hair :)
What about kiwi's?  ;D

185
StockXpert.com / Re: Rate/Comment/View the Image Above Yours!
« on: December 19, 2007, 18:53 »
Rated and commented!
Here's mine, just got accepted a few minutes ago!  ;D

http://www.stockxpert.com/browse.phtml?f=view&id=7659431

186
StockXpert.com / Re: StockXpert Image Upload Suspension
« on: December 19, 2007, 18:31 »
Wow this is unbelievable!  :o
I just uploaded a vector, and it got accepted the same second.
After uploading I wanted to check if everything was filled in correctly and than I saw it was in the system already.
This must be the world record!

Way to go StockXpert, this rocks!  ;D

187
Shutterstock.com / Re: Something strange at Shutterstock
« on: December 15, 2007, 17:10 »
If you have an establised account with an agency why would you have to verify by email sound phishy  I would change the password on your account :o

Don't worry, no phishing:
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29875

188
StockXpert.com / Re: Rate/Comment/View the Image Above Yours!
« on: December 06, 2007, 21:36 »
Wow Adelaide, you're really busy here! Did you already notice an increase of sales?

Just did Adelaide's image. Here's mine:
http://www.stockxpert.com/browse.phtml?f=view&id=974971

189
General Stock Discussion / Re: POLL: November Earnings
« on: December 02, 2007, 09:45 »
Why?
Because of a main trend or because that you had many christmas related sales?
Yes I think the last. But is it trend also?

190
General Stock Discussion / Re: POLL: November Earnings
« on: December 01, 2007, 15:05 »
BME by about 420$
It's going too well.
I'm expecting a huge drop after christmas.

191
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Image hunts for credits
« on: November 30, 2007, 23:42 »
Yes, found them! Got 5 credits.  8)

192
This wouldn't be fair for Istock. That guy found your images through Istock, Istock did all the marketing, and now you are going to make the sale without Istock?
Seems wrong to me!

193
Microstock News / Re: Photoshop User Awards
« on: November 29, 2007, 09:10 »
Entry Fee: $35.00??? That sucks. >:(


194
StockXpert.com / Re: Rate/Comment/View the Image Above Yours!
« on: November 29, 2007, 08:59 »
Rated and commented Freezingpictures!

Here's one of mine:
http://www.stockxpert.com/browse.phtml?f=view&id=1019291

195
Featurepics.com / Re: Interview with Elena of FP
« on: November 20, 2007, 20:04 »
One statement struck me:
Quote
"What we are realizing is that there are artists who do care to see their work in good hands and there are some who abuse the system. Our effort has been concentrated with helping to promote the artists and eradicate the abusers."
What would those abusers do then? I'm intrigued.
I don't know about FP but I know who they are on SS.
They stuff their vectors like a christmas turkey with hundreds of unrelated images, all for the price of one.

196
Photoshop Discussion / Re: problem with isolating objects
« on: November 19, 2007, 16:30 »
I never use fill, I just delete the selection, but one important step I think you're missing is using feather (in PSP, I believe it's the same name in PS) to give a smooth transition.

I agree the automated selections don't work well in general.  I often use them for a rough selection, I contract the selection and delete that part.  Then I trace a line manually around the subject, use feather, delete.
Feather, exactly, that's what I mean.
Now in CS3 "feather" is "refine edge".(sorry I said "define" in my previous post) But now you get a life preview, saves you a lott of ctrl-z's!  :)

197
Photoshop Discussion / Re: problem with isolating objects
« on: November 19, 2007, 13:19 »
I think that the best way to isolate objects is to shoot them on white. Isolation at post-processing stage is at best difficult and at worst impossible.


With Photoshop everything is possible!





Those images are old, I'm sure I would do a better job right now with CS3.

198
Photoshop Discussion / Re: problem with isolating objects
« on: November 19, 2007, 13:05 »
I am inclined to buy CS2 just for isolating objects properly. What do you think?
If you got the money, buy CS3! The new "define edge" function is great for isolations.

199
StockXpert.com / Re: steve-oh
« on: November 18, 2007, 17:59 »
I agree, Steve is a very  helpful admin!
Thumbs up!  :)

200
Crestock.com / Re: Biggest Photoshop Contest of the Year!
« on: November 14, 2007, 10:24 »
Wow great prices!
But I swore myself never to enter one of those * contests again.
What if you lose? At least at StockXpert your image was also for sale.
I don't even submit to Crestock, I don't waste my time on low earners.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors