pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Noedelhap

Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 90
1801
iStockPhoto.com / Re: They REALLY hate exclusives
« on: March 16, 2014, 20:00 »
I understand it from Istocks point of view, if they'd actually screw their exclusives. Exclusivity doesn't really mean anything anymore, in today's microstock industry. The supply of images is overwhelming, so what extra value does exclusive images really have from a buyers perspective? Given the fact that Istock has to pay more commission to its exclusives, they could encourage independent contributers and discourage exclusives.

Of course, if one hates the way he or she is treated as an exclusive, the option would be to leave the sinking ship and spread your wings to other agencies. From what I understand, sales were declining for exclusives anyway, but correct me if I'm wrong.

1802
I had some ELs turned into 28 cents too... So they were a mistake? They were actually 28 cent downloads?

Yes, those sales weren't EL sales to begin with, according to iStock. I had this confirmed by the support desk.

1803
Sheer brilliance :D

1804
Dreamstime.com / Re: Sell the rights request.
« on: March 12, 2014, 06:31 »
In my opinion, $1000 is way too cheap. Consider the fact you'll never be able to sell that file again. How much money will it make in a lifetime? Then at least double or triple that amount.

Also consider why the client would like the rights. They'll probably use it for a marketing campaign or several media publications for a long time. That's worth something.

I once sold an image (through another agency) for more than $5000. I wasn't involved in the negotiations but somehow the client (a big company) agreed to it. So my advice is, never go too low out of fear. You might be missing out on big bucks.

1805
Great comic :D

1806
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is iStock website down?
« on: March 05, 2014, 17:59 »
let's see the other side, imagine I was an illustrator like you, possibly a good competitor with similar work, your site was down and I took advantage on your own twitter saying that my website is running and could give a discount as well, how would you feel?

It's a business, not a playground.
I think it's completely fair to make use of one company's downtime to promote your own images. We're running a business, so this has nothing to do with hurting other people's feelings, it's about competition. It's aggressive, sure, but every business person with a sense of marketing would make use of situations like this. The buyer needs an image, so as Istocks competitor, you have a choice:
1) don't market your own site (to avoid hurting iStocks feelings), wait for an undetermined amount of time for istock to come up (could be hours), while the buyer needs an image NOW
2) use aggressive marketing to earn some money (the goal of any good business), get a happy buyer, destroy your competitor (in this case, iStock, who, by the way, fully deserves to lose buyers over this)


1807
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is iStock website down?
« on: March 04, 2014, 11:57 »
"The glitch monsters are at work down in the dark internety room, but they sent a note up that said: Dear You, Me fix broken thing. Sorry for trouble. Love, Monsters.
They, and the site, will be back up soon."

Hopefully, their 8-year old clients enjoyed that extremely hilarious message.

1808
I cannot understand why you dont stop doing business with them. Dont you have any pride or principles?


Pride doesn't pay your rent.

1809
To my surprise, a few days after I sent the support ticket I received an excel file from Support, with all sales data: File ID, purchase date, original dollars received, revised dollars received and the difference.

So if you want your data, sending a support ticket should do the trick.

1810
I requested payout before receiving the mail that they were taking the money out.  My balance before they took the money out was showing as .76.  I don't see any balance showing now - not negative numbers, not anything.  Weird. 

I assume either they will take it out of the request I made, or I should be in negative numbers at the moment. 

Ahh, you know you could have gotten the .76 as well, just type it after the dollar amount. ;)

I cashed out as well, right before they removed the money. On the Financials tabs it shows the negative amount.

1811
"We have removed a total of $-20.97 from your account."

That's a double negative, in other words, I am getting that money?   :D

1812
They recouped the first instalment. Without providing data. I consider this theft if they are unwilling to provide the evidence to support their recoupment claim.

1813
I don't care about apologies, I want my data. Every tracked sale, every royalty, every little dollar detail. And I want it NOW.

1814
I bet they're waiting as long as possible to get some more interest on the money they are withholding from us.

1815
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac closing
« on: February 26, 2014, 05:57 »
I think that's for buyers only, isn't it? I thought as a contributor, you don't need to do anything, the merging goes automatically.

1816
Sent a ticket to CR:

Dear Istock Contributor Relations,

I have received your Partner Program Recoupment Notification.
Because your administration has shown to be prone to huge errors affecting many contributors, I want to make sure no mistakes are being made with this recoupment plan.
Therefore, I demand a full, detailed report featuring all misreported sales, the amount paid and the amount recouped before you take any money from my account.

You may email this report to [email protected].

Your sincerely,
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Username: Noedelhap


Don't hold your breath: there's a ticket backlog:



Yeah, I was aware of the backlog, so I doubt they'll respond to it, let alone with a report, but it can't hurt to let them know we're expecting a certain level of professionalism from them.

1817
Sent a ticket to CR:

Dear Istock Contributor Relations,

I have received your Partner Program Recoupment Notification.
Because your administration has shown to be prone to huge errors affecting many contributors, I want to make sure no mistakes are being made with this recoupment plan.
Therefore, I demand a full, detailed report featuring all misreported sales, the amount paid and the amount recouped before you take any money from my account.

You may email this report to [email protected].

Your sincerely,
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Username: Noedelhap

1818
It was much more than I had expected. "We discovered that there were some irregularities" is a big understatement. And indeed, not even an apology? Unbelievable. Not only because they actually screwed up, but also because we apparently can't expect much more in terms of PP sales.

1819
iStockPhoto.com / Re: No Thumbnail Displays When Uploading
« on: February 17, 2014, 18:49 »
They actually did this on purpose? There is no microstock site that doesn't show the thumbnail image of any upload during the keywording process. But Istock has such major site speed issues they need to take this drastic measure? Seems like there's some bigger fundamental flaw somewhere if they have to resort to less functionality to keep the site alive.

1820
That was 5 weeks ago. I don't think I got an e-mail. I guess I'll have to go back and look for it.

Don't waste your time. They haven't sent any email whatsoever. They love to keep their contributors guessing.


Not surprisingly, Lobo confirmed that there have been no underpayments, only overpayments. Of course. How convenient for them.

1821
I wish I could protect my account money from them. There should be a rule: if money earned is not clawed back after a month, it's yours, no matter what.

1822
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP started for December - finally!
« on: January 30, 2014, 11:29 »
I did bad, in December. Both in terms of PP and regular sales. Luckily, January is on the up again.

1823
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock Video - HD, NTSC & PAL???
« on: January 26, 2014, 20:40 »
Yeah, I upload one HD video (1080p) only.

1824
Shutterstock.com / Re: How are sales going?- Shutterstock
« on: January 24, 2014, 19:19 »
Sales are going well. Not better or worse than last year, but it's still steady.

1825
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy Refund Policy - Totally Unacceptable
« on: January 21, 2014, 20:50 »
Because good customer service = repeat business.)

Who would want repeat business from a customer who returns his images after the 30-day warranty period?

Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 90

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors