MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zager

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
201
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 14, 2010, 14:12 »
Thank you guys (BaldricksTrousers and donding) for commenting on the quality. We've been testing a lot which is the finest and it should be really tuned in our collection. But what I'm sure is not good is the re-saving we do with Fotolia images because what we get is 400px files and double save definitely kills red colors. I'm actively communicating with both supliers to give us better data and better quality service, but it's not always easy.

Thank you Anita Potter to find the 1970's bug. It's fixed already.

And mtkang, yes I'm sure it should be completely on Pixmac and I'm going to find out where's the problem. The developer that does that part of the site just left to vacation till 28th, so I'll be asking him to find out on next Monday 30th.

And Dirkr, how you can tell that? ;-) I'm the author of that photo and now I'm the exact position as many contributors are ;-) No, I'm joking... it was actually a snapshot for Simon...


Thank you all for the feedback!

202
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 09:20 »
You already won Press release of the year, what else is left for us?  :D

Bucketloads of Starbucks for free in Prague! ;-)

203
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 09:09 »
Quote
We are all Mac obsessed, drink bucketloads of Starbucks

I'm sorry, but... Oh. My. God.  :o

Hi Peter :-) I hope you've enjoyed CEPIC as I did and you'll show up some smart ideas on your site! Let's do a Hungarian/Czech cometition game ;-) You guys made a nice site anyway! Good start!

204
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 08:28 »
Control and reselling issue

My opinion on this is simple: Fotolia and Dreamstime are fair businesses that want to make serious money. If they have any partners that don't make money or are doing anything suspicious they're terminating that partnerships because it's not only making you contributors angry, but also them. It's simple as that I think, but I'm usually optimistic and idealistic guy.

Pixmac has to and I'm sure all the other channels of FT and DT have to fully respect the terms and conditions of the original site. So this means you're legally covered in the same way.

As for the control, I completely understand that Fotolia and Dreamstime don't show so much clear info about Pixmac or any other resellers, because contributors would be able to go to those agencies directly and that's not helping either FT and DT. So even that I understand their behavior, I agree that it's not open and clear to you guys. I can promise to keep that in mind and if anything comes to my head (as it did with the one stop idea that's now being copied by other agencies) I'll be making everything possible to have it implemented. But still we're small David and they are Goliathes.

But the question is obviously right. Should I as a contributor get more sales and be more afraid of what's happening inside the agencies or should I build up my own site and try to market my images on my own? Both options have pros and cons.

Portfolios differences

Guys Dirkr and mtkang, this is really strange. I'm going to find out what's behind that, because we should have everything. I'm sending the info to our dev team and will wait for their findings.

And we're doing the duplicates detection based on the small thumbs. So no keyword should harm that. It's some University technology that compares visual data and matches duplicates.

We're taking the prices and sizes from the API and what I've seen was that the set of sizes sometimes don't match to set of sizes on the actual Fotolia/Dreamstime site. I think it's because they have some API partners that need to have exact set of sizes, so any change in API sizes would cause a problem.

As for the prices, you should get your standard revenue as if the image was sold on FT or DT. With the OneStop sales you get also the revenue as if it was sold for less, because what we do is we give the price difference to the customer as a free coupon to buy a credit pack. The idea is: "You can taste Pixmac and if you like it you can get the same price as the credit pack customers get."

We don't change contrast or saturation of the files we get from FT and DT but we make them a bit more colorful and sharp if they're in our direct collection (3-5%). My opinion is that shining apple sells better than the others. It shouldn't be much but for the results I hope it helps.

Contributor credits don't expire

The expiration was changed a few weeks ago for contributors. And yes there's a minimum of $0.10 fee to all contributors if it's sold via subscription. But be sure that our subscription is not too much popular as it only has 230k+ images.

Thank you Sharpshot, Rubyroo and Artemis

Guys, this is really something to thank you for! It's been busy two years here at Pixmac and I'm the one who was fighting a lot to make Pixmac the best site ever and you don't even know how hard it sometimes is. I wish I can tell you everything. But anyway, I'll be here as long as I can and I'll do my best to change the old rule that: "Contributor is never satisfied" to "Contributor likes what Pixmac does" (yes I'm idealistic). Honestly, thank you! If you ever feel bad, write an email to [email protected] or send a DM to http://twitter.com/pixmac and I'll be listening.

205
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 01:51 »
I found out one can click their own contributor's name on pixmac, so i only see my partial portfolio, all from fotolia.

so where is my portfolio from dreamstime?

Can you send over your nickname or links to DT, FT and PX portfolios? I'm curious myself... Thx.

206
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 01:50 »
is there a way we can see how many images of one's in pixmac?

and is there a way to know which sales of dreamstime are from pixmac.

i would like to know how many pictures of my dreamstime and fotolia portfolio are in pixmac.

any advantage to upload directly to pixmac?


1. On Fotolia you should be able to see "Sold via third party channel" or something like that. I hope it's still there. This was discussed in some Fotolia forum thread about a year a go.

2. I don't think you'll be able to see it on Dreamstime. But I'll ask Serban...

3. We take all the images that FT and DT offers via their API. We update that every day (every 24 hours) and there's no way how to choose which images we take and which not. So if it's sent over API we have it. In some cases the updating may be broken, so there might be delays in the sync. But if you spot any significant differences and if they have any logic in it, just let me know, because I want to have complete data not a portion of that. If you upload to DT and FT at the same time, part of the images might be set as duplicates, but together it should be the same amount of images. If not let's investigate the case and fine the cure.

4. You'll be in our subscription (which most of you don't like) and you'll be in our API chain of partners as eg. http://www.ccvision.de/de/microstock/ but currently our focus is to generate serious sales. As we've started with paying for uploads as any other new agency did and found out that we were not able to satisfy contributors later on with sales.

So our general target now is make the fastest site in the market (we're almost there). Make it easy for the buyers (I'm sure we are already leaders in this). Make the site localised for several markets (we have 15 people locally already in several countries). All that together with some other ideas that we're launching soon should make you guys a bit more satisfied. Because that's what I've been doing for those two years (just check the forums here for my nickname and you'll see what has changed during that time)...


Vita

207
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 12, 2010, 01:37 »
As for the opt-out: When I was checking that there was something like a checkbox to be able to opt-out on Fotolia. Now what I see in our Profile, there's only: "I accept to be a Fotolia total exclusive contributor and I accept to be bound to the Fotolia exclusive contributor Terms and Conditions" which may tell that you should be exclusive otherwise you can be redistributed.

Well if that's the case and you're pretty sure that Pixmac shouldn't be your distributor channel, just send an email to our support department and we will remove your files at Pixmac. But before you do so, please Skype me, go with me for a cofee or a drink and you'll see that we're on the boat together. If we will stretch the price to unreal levels that would mean that even we don't make enough money to pay all the marketing etc. So believe that at least Pixmac's target is not to kill it's contributors.

I'm a designer and CEO for 2 years only. So it's more on Simon to say what's his predictions on the stock photo market. But I'm sure that the prices reached their bottom line and there is no reason why it should go lower. On the other hand, the "TraditionalRF safety harbour" is getting smaller and smaller and there are contributors that can produce more material for less. And that's a real thread.

One last thing: Ask Yuri Arcurs if he likes Pixmac or not. He mentioned Pixmac at CEPIC speach that we're doing the online marketing better than any other agency. So the problem whe have is only that we're "only" two years in the market. But we'll make it and we will be always listening to you guys...

Sorry for that long bla bla bla.. ;-)

208
Pixmac / Re: Big ambition from Pixmac [Press Release]
« on: August 11, 2010, 14:19 »
Anyway, some of you should watch more of this:
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
rather than the conspiration movies some of you probably like...

Vitezslav, Pixmac's CEO

209
Oh, I'm there on Tuesday. So I'll miss this. Enjoy anyway! Vita

210
Adobe Stock / Re: FT partners
« on: April 02, 2010, 09:21 »
At Pixmac we're syncing every 24 hours. We have a separate Java based search index that's faster when working with local data. So the change should be applied in 24 hours in search and autors page. The purchase is not available immediately and there is also a check that tells the buyer the information just before purchase (there's another check).

If anyone of you have any questions, I'm ready to talk about them.

Vita, CEO

211
Always the same story. But this time it was not because there were no buyers. The problem was elsewhere as Andy said. Well, it's not easy for them as it's not easy for some photographers to leave the project.

212
Pixmac / Re: So, what's the deal with pixmac?
« on: November 06, 2009, 09:59 »
Hello. I'm Pixmac CEO: Vita Valka

Check out this:
http://blog.pixmac.com/2009/10/28/dreamstime-stock-photos-at-pixmac/

And this:
http://blog.pixmac.com/2008/11/24/why-do-i-have-my-photos-at-pixmac/

Please give me a link to your picture at Pixmac that have EL set to $50 and link to Fotolia where is set to 100 cr. and I'll check that with our tech team.

Other questions directly to: [email protected] please.

213
Microstock News / Re: Pixmac adds Dreamstime to offering
« on: November 02, 2009, 18:24 »
Hello Warren, thank you for the note about Czech Republic (or Czechoslovakia). I was in Texas a few months ago (Honeymoon), as seen here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zager/3759568348/#in/set-72157621844890310/

Have fun!

214
Microstock News / Re: Pixmac adds Dreamstime to offering
« on: November 02, 2009, 08:25 »
Yes, Lucie was right. You should get the same money as over DT. And you don't have to care about 1 year lock-in at Pixmac. Anyway, the Year long lock-in is a real headache for many photographers, so we're working on it and hopefully we'll solve it soon :-)

215
Microstock News / Re: Pixmac adds Dreamstime to offering
« on: November 02, 2009, 07:20 »
Thank you for the questions! I'm the Pixmac's CEO: Vitezslav Valka aka Zager...

1. The prices at Pixmac will exactly respect DT prices. So as said above, it's just more exposure for the pictures you already have.

2. The lincencing is same as on DT. So we'll respect fully the DT and FT licensing rules at Pixmac and also that means you don't have to worry.


As I see the market, there will be several sellers in the future as Pixmac is. Some of them may be based on iSyndica platform and some on the contracts as we're with FT and DT. In the end the Photographer should get what he deserves when selling over the direct site.

In other words, we're trying to be as fair as possible, as you can see here:
http://blog.pixmac.com/2009/08/05/the-way-to-satisfy-photographers-at-pixmac-we-think-we-can/

216
Pixmac / Re: Why is my portfolio on Pixmac
« on: October 20, 2009, 10:14 »
Yes, we're selling Fotolia and also our own collection and also celebrity content from a traditional agency for micro prices. Feel free to contact us over Skype, Twitter.com/pixmac or email.

And as a bonus, you can see our team photo in this article:
http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/startup-show-2009-zna-sveho-viteze/

Have fun gyus!
Vitezslav Valka

217
New Sites - General / Re: pixmac - a new low $0.028 sale
« on: August 05, 2009, 04:59 »
Hello Nesidez, it seems so! Geez. I'm going to fix it ASAP.

Anyway, here is the promissed article:
http://blog.pixmac.com/2009/08/05/the-way-to-satisfy-photographers-at-pixmac-we-think-we-can/

218
New Sites - General / Re: pixmac - a new low $0.028 sale
« on: July 31, 2009, 08:33 »
If you mean the page (when you're not logged in) here: http://www.pixmac.com/sell-photos

That just says: 30% for non-exclusives and 45% for exclusive content. The words "starting at" mean basically that there are situations (such as the photographers that came before March 2009) that you can get more. And this is also connected to Affiliate program (best deal as far as I know) where you can get 25% + 25% more if you bring either the buyer or the photographer to us. So in the best situation the math is done like this:

Exclusive picture sold for $10
- you get 45%, 55% remains
- if the buyer is your affiliate, you get 25% out of those remaining 55%
- if you also have the author as an affiliate, you get another 25% out of those 55%

So finally you can end up earning 72,5% of the sale (45% + two quarters of the 55%), while Pixmac gets only 27,5%. Sure that situation happens once in a lifetime. More common, if you're with us for a longer time and have non-exclusive pictures, you can still get 62,5% (50%+12,5%) if the sale goes just over one your affiliates.

And guys, if you have any other questions, send them to me. I'm writing a blog post named: "A way to satisfy photographers?" so anything painful can be answered there from the other side :-)

Zager.

zager:
and what about this?

Quote
it also says a sliding scale between 30-44% but with no explanation anywhere on the site as to how this works or what increments are involved


219
New Sites - General / Re: pixmac - a new low $0.028 sale
« on: July 30, 2009, 04:02 »
Phil: sorry, sure for newcommers. I've send a task to Lucie at Pixmac so she will take care of it soon.

The subscription generally.

As far as I know, the subscription is for bigger customers that need easier acces (no care about prepaing, justmonthly price) and also needs a feeling of good price. That is why SS is that successful from my point of view.

So mostly, you get more downloads for less money per dl, but after all, those customers try to use their daily credits, so they're motivated more to download "anything". But at Pixmac, subscription is not a big deal, so as I mentioned, we're working on something better for us, customer and sure the photographers (belive me or not).

Thx.

220
New Sites - General / Re: pixmac - a new low $0.028 sale
« on: July 29, 2009, 09:24 »
Thx. I'll keep the number $0.38 in my mind! Proof attached :-)

221
Albumo.com / Re: ALBUMO GONE
« on: July 29, 2009, 03:51 »
To Sharpshot: The thread was commented. Feel free to let me know if anything like that pops up. I would like to answer everything, but I'm not here reading the discussions every day... thx!

222
New Sites - General / Re: pixmac - a new low $0.028 sale
« on: July 29, 2009, 03:38 »
Guys,
sorry I was not replying to this. I'm checking the forum from time to time, so if anything like this needs to be solved here in the public, please let me know (email, icq, gtalk, skype, msn, facebook, twitter - I'm ready!).

To the issues I found:

1. One year lock-in

This is a painful thing, sure! I convinced the owners to make it "1 year" from "2 years" that have been there before. But be sure, I am working on improving that to even less or another way to make you guys comfortable. The other thing is, that somebody who wanted money just for uploading photos should know that we have to make the money to pay him/her.

2. Snail mail

Calm down. You don't have to send any letters to Prague. An email and some ID confirmation is fine. We're not stupid here and if any of you guys think that we're doing bad things, better than shout here, send me an email, ok? [email protected]

3. Subscription prices

I knew about this and so we removed the advertising from the homepage right away. And also moved the price from $0.06 to $0.10 so almost twice. It's a first step. Now we're considering about taking out subscription completely and finding another way how to satisfy customers in similar way. Also Extended License will be sold only for regular credits soon.

4. Lower commisions

Sorry, Ftolia contract limits. At least the commisions changed for newcomers only.

5. Download calcullation

If there is a problem with counting, please contact us! Michal Prynych is the guy you need. We're doing our best, we don't wanna hurt you. But when I see the forums, there's plenty of voices that never send a word to us directly...

6. Other improvements

I'm preparing an article about what we do for photographers (I just came from honeymoon on Sunday). Sure there is more to do for you, sure we can be "different". Eg. delete community section as Albumo. But we make it differently in other way. My intention is to make the site good for photographers as good for the buyers. Even some of you think we're just stupid bunch of loozers.

Check our blog in next few weeks. Certainly I'll post there also ideas from this thread.

223
Albumo.com / Re: ALBUMO GONE
« on: July 27, 2009, 15:37 »
Guys, eg. Pixmac paid everything promissed. And is still alive and healthy. Check for your self: www.pixmac.com or ask mr. Dolgachov here: http://blog.pixmac.com/2009/06/23/interview-with-photographer-lev-dolgachov/

224
I would suggest removing the hyperlink and warning people not to visit there in case they ain't covered. :)

Firefox blocks it. Of course.


I've notified the owner right now. I think he'll remove it soon.

Vitezslav

225
Albumo.com / Re: Albumo, not dead?
« on: June 06, 2009, 14:51 »

Well, not exactly "bad" but I wonder when I will be send the money for 500 accepted images? I cannot find any info about this bonus in my prof. information...


peep: Please write to [email protected] she will send you all the info required. W've paid almost all contributors with the $100 option (3 remains as far as I know, we're in contact with them). So if you have the 500 photos accepted, look here http://blog.pixmac.com/2009/03/03/photographers-where-are-you/ and please write to Lucie.

Thank you!

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors