We agree - you should be able to edit metadata on your own, after files are accepted. This is true for all content, no matter if it was transferred from SnapVillage or if it was newly uploaded.

We do plan on releasing tools to enable you to edit metadata after the fact.
While I don't have an exact ETA, this functionality is definitely planned for a future contributor release.

- Brian

That is good news. I hope it's not too long. 
Thanks Brian.

I have all my images on Panthermedia set to 30% commission because they are all for sale on other agencies.
My recent sales have given me commission rates of 51%. (yes 51% not 50%). When I checked my images  all the rates have been changed to 50%.
I changes some of them back to 30, and notified support. They replied that they could see nothing wrong.
Another sale went through at 51%, and the images I had corrected a couple of days ago have changed back from 30 to 50%. I contacted them again, but have not heard anything.
meantime, I do not want to touch the money they owe me just in case.
Can you check your portfolios and let me know if this is a site problem or just my port?   

A problem a lot of us had was not with the importing, but with the way things were run on Snapvillage. They changed the keywords of most of our images, and in a very amateurish way. I wondered if they were native English speaker at all.
We would appreciate a chance to edit the keywords of the images that were imported, perhaps as a one off exercise?

I have similar problems. None of my images have descriptions, and the keyword are ridiculous. Can you help with this Brian?

Well today I am disappointed with Veer. I cannot get the FTP to work, I cannot upload with the browser uploader, and the site is horrendously slow.
Ah well, I hope they can fix it soon.
It would have been nice if it had been tested first. Why do we always get to be the guinea pigs?

I tried to log in this morning and couldn't. I emailed support, but am still waiting for an answer.

It wasn't on the front page when I uploaded!

Hey that's a great link!
It says istocks website is worth $136, shutterstock is only worth $127!    

It would be very interesting to see a similar comparison for Getty.

no.

this is my last post ever.

posting here is a waste of time.
farewell.

Ahhhh, and we so enjoy a good laugh.
See you soon.

I always think that if you put your pictures into the critique section, you are advertising that you do not really know your trade. Not an image you want to project.
Do buyers really look around the forums? Sure, one or two may be the exception to the rule, but surely that's not what the vast majority of buyers are doing.
Getting more exposure to fellow contributors means more exposure to copyists who will rip off your portfolio.
The exposure we want, to the people who count, is much harder.

I have wondered if it would be worth our while to band together as forum members and take out our own advert in a trade magazine. What do you think?

Would it work if you were to scan half the note at a time then put the halves together?

I have da solution. Sell more pics to make up the money ! It's probably the easiest route.

Ha ha ha. Brilliant!