MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mantis
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 219
251
« on: April 29, 2021, 08:34 »
I got it too, very vague on details.
It says "If youre happy with our selection, then no further action is needed. If you would like to add or delete files, please do so within 7 days of receiving this email."
but no explanation on how to do any of that.
Or why? What is the actual incentive to upload more or, what is the dis-incentive that would prompt me to delete them all? And we need to learn what this is within 7 days or make a blind decision. Rarely are these moves for the good of the contributor, so that's probably my answer right there.
252
« on: April 29, 2021, 08:32 »
Same here. Wonder if they are trying to do something similar to Elements.
254
« on: January 11, 2021, 10:14 »
Geeze.
255
« on: January 01, 2021, 09:32 »
If you go into your earnings page, there are sales for December 2020. For some reason they are not reporting on the graph. Mine is a whopping 7 bucks.
256
« on: December 24, 2020, 09:28 »
The bigger questions is WHY would they do this?
257
« on: December 24, 2020, 09:26 »
The only thing he will try to improve is his bank account. He has been very clear about that with his actions.
^this^
258
« on: November 23, 2020, 08:09 »
Just often enough to keep me there.
Their opaque methods of reporting earnings galls me, but, once I sort out what they actually are, it's decent.
Agree with this. My sales trickle in at $5-20 then I get the occasional $100-$200 sales. The last few months have been fairly good where I have $250-$500 a month before my cut. AMAZINGLY....I had a video sale there last month for 50 some odd dollars. I have some of my clips there before they stopped accepting vids. I think they are doing something to get back into video, but not sure what that is. But I'd hardly consider one video sale in four years a winning site for that kind of asset.
259
« on: November 10, 2020, 09:00 »
Regardless of the race, ethnicity, religion, location, gender or sexual preference of the thief, Shutterstock should operate under a zero tolerance policy on any account that uploads even one clip/image that is not theirs legally to upload. Flat out. The moment Shutterstock becomes aware that a specific account is run by a thief, and chooses to ignore it, they become accessories to the crime and under any real legal scrutiny would be held at least partially responsible for any losses. Most likely, Shutterstock realizes that they get to keep 100% of sales from these accounts if left to sell and then conveniently removed before anything gets paid out. Making their behavior appear to be intentionally criminal.
Well stated, Daryl.
260
« on: October 16, 2020, 12:51 »
I'm getting a few Dreamstime "customer refund" emails lately. Anyone else? Is this some form of image abuse?
Yes, and my response would be to say, thanks. That is 2 months worth of sales!
261
« on: October 16, 2020, 12:32 »
Please, all stock agencies, stop doing stupid experiments.
With 70,000 free premium photos, any topic is covered.
Actually this isn't true, I've had a look and a few of my niche areas aren't covered so that's a relief.
Come on. Use simple 80/20 thinking. Many sellable themes are covered in the free section. Great for you that your niche is not impacted, but for the lion's share of contributors their subject matter is covered for FREE.
262
« on: September 20, 2020, 16:35 »
Jpeg only, wonder how it compares to a raw file post processed to same end result.
I have shot low light raw in my M2P and it is horrible.
263
« on: September 12, 2020, 08:18 »
Nothing earth shattering about that piece. I think anyone who has been in the biz for a while knows the themes very well. The one thing he states is the "internet scams" and he is right. I still see all these ads to make a good income from photography. "We are better than Fine Art America" gallery sites, "we have an un-discovered photography niche", etc. They are really laughable and Jim is right in that the only ones who will make any money are those agencies who exploit photographers.
264
« on: September 10, 2020, 19:37 »
"Licenses issued by Playstock for any of your Content that is later removed by yourself will remain in full force and effect in perpetuity."
Yea, NO!!
Well, to be fair, thats true of all agencies.
Mainly true. Motion Elements is two Years. I just completed my two years post account closing and was finally able to delete my already sold vids that were locked for that two years.
Doesn't it mean that buyers who bought a license, will keep that license even if you remove your videos from the platform? Cause that's pretty obvious and fair. You cannot revoke a license a customer paid for.
I am merely relaying you the terms set forth by ME. Those were the terms. I deleted my content in compliance with the terms.
Sorry for the confusion, I was talking about the PlayStock term you mentioned; my point is, if PlayStock issues a license to a customer for your video, and you later remove your video, then the purchased license should still remain valid for the customer.
Based on their terms, you are spot on.
265
« on: September 10, 2020, 11:31 »
"Licenses issued by Playstock for any of your Content that is later removed by yourself will remain in full force and effect in perpetuity."
Yea, NO!!
Well, to be fair, thats true of all agencies.
Mainly true. Motion Elements is two Years. I just completed my two years post account closing and was finally able to delete my already sold vids that were locked for that two years.
Doesn't it mean that buyers who bought a license, will keep that license even if you remove your videos from the platform? Cause that's pretty obvious and fair. You cannot revoke a license a customer paid for.
I am merely relaying you the terms set forth by ME. Those were the terms. I deleted my content in compliance with the terms.
266
« on: September 10, 2020, 08:23 »
"Licenses issued by Playstock for any of your Content that is later removed by yourself will remain in full force and effect in perpetuity."
Yea, NO!!
Well, to be fair, thats true of all agencies.
Mainly true. Motion Elements is two Years. I just completed my two years post account closing and was finally able to delete my already sold vids that were locked for that two years.
267
« on: September 10, 2020, 08:13 »
"Licenses issued by Playstock for any of your Content that is later removed by yourself will remain in full force and effect in perpetuity."
Yea, NO!!
"Any user who fails to provide accurate and sufficient information required for the Company to deliver royalties from their Content may not be compensated even if their Content has been sold, and the amount that has not been issued will be returned to the Company during year-end adjustments."
Yea, NO!!
"Playstock shall have the right to retain any unissued royalties and/or other compensation when you terminate your account." I would rethink this. It's a bad, unfair message sent to contributors.
268
« on: September 08, 2020, 20:20 »
And why the boycott? I have about 100 photos there, I sometimes get royalties. There have never been any problems.
Okay, you obviously have not been following what is going on at SS. Or dont care that they are ripping you off. Search this forum.
269
« on: September 07, 2020, 08:46 »
I have a portfolio of 1200 pics on zoonar for about 14 months now and havent sold a single pic yet. Not worth the effort.
I have 6000 images on Zoonar. My last sale was in February 2020. The previous one was in November 2019
Yes, not worth the effort
I do not understand this post. This was a press release about the fact that an agency had founded a new (second) license portal to sell more photos itself in the future. It's no logic to say they haven't sold much so far, so they don't have to do anything to sell more in the future. The attempt in itself is worth it. It is always better than doing nothing or increasing your profit by reducing photo fees. It is clear that no miracles are to be expected. The market no longer produces miracles. It is shrinking ...
He is saying that Zoonar as a whole is not worth the effort. There are little to no sales on the main platform and it's easy to correlate that there would be equally little to no sales with the Express approach. I have personally never uploaded to Zoonar just because they report so low on the earnings potential scale. But that's just me.
270
« on: August 31, 2020, 13:40 »
My portfolio of 6,800 has been gone since June. I have made payout in July and will again make payout in August with ZERO assets online. Another few weeks and that will stop completely. Well, it should.
271
« on: August 24, 2020, 11:49 »
I applied way back when they had their first open submission and was rejected. Still today, I don't know what their criteria is. That's fine. I am happy for Stocksy, though. An agency that is mainly successful for contributors is rare today. Now, I define success loosely because I have zero insights into their financial performance other than reading posts where artists in Stocksy appear happy with their sales. I'll probably never be in "the club", but I do wish them long term sustainability.
272
« on: August 22, 2020, 21:30 »
P5 does fk you the the ash with some of these sales. I just got a 4k sale yesterday and made $1.17. Disgusting.
273
« on: August 21, 2020, 08:22 »
I made about $1- $3 a month there. Been gone for several years. They just never got any traction, showing how challenging (and expensive) it is to start a micro agency.
274
« on: August 19, 2020, 09:49 »
What impact? To get better treatment? Nowadays is much more images rejected because the subject is "too similar". So instead of let's say 10 images are approved 5-7. This means less new images is added. SS made this kind of 'impact'. Their review rules has impact for less uploads, people started focusing on Adobe, DT and others.
Less images added weekly/monthly doesn't mean SS will be "fair, kind and loving" to contributors.
Each coin has two sides: The second one is lots of contributors are happier now. More of you will leave and delete own portfolio, more space will get the majority staying there. Do you think that Sean, Lisa, Monkey Business, will go against Shutterstock and leave the income behind?
I cannot speak for them, but I did get a PM from another big player saying they are NOT deleting their port.
275
« on: August 19, 2020, 07:54 »
Clear your cache. It works after doing that.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 219
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|