MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - click_click
2851
« on: June 11, 2009, 12:42 »
...This doesn't happen over night and will take a great deal of dedication. The more diversification through out the industry the stronger your business model will be in the long haul.
Good Luck, Jonathan
Well put. I can't speak for Getty or Corbis but when I knocked on Jupiter's and Acclaim's doors they wanted some samples of my work. I sent them the stuff and they were happy with my work and said I could come on board. A day later I got two emails stating that they googled my name and found out that I'm on the micros and therefore refused to represent me. OF COURSE, the images I sent them were absolutely exclusive. I didn't even send them anything that was remotely similar to what I had on the micros. Go figure.
2852
« on: June 11, 2009, 08:20 »
Hey, she lives right around me somewhere.
Well that's awesome... Sorry for my language, but what idiot is putting full res images of anything online if it isn't for selling it? Why would anyone upload huge 5-10 MP snapshots in the first place? Do most people already have monitors with 3500x2333 pixel resolution??? If you want to "share your family photos" do it on a image hosting site that allows private folders. Can't stop shaking my head. The lady didn't do anything wrong but I don't do anything wrong either driving my Ferrari into a bad neighborhood with the keys in the ignition and leaving the car running by itself for an hour... Guess what happens? Some people just ask for trouble...
2853
« on: June 10, 2009, 16:44 »
I have a couple of questions regarding royalties in regards to Veer & SV. Hopefully someone can provide an answer...
1) What is going to happen to the royalties earned on SV? a) will they be folded into Veer? b) will Veer sales be reported and folded back to SV?
2) In looking at my SV royalty detail for May, the detail adds up to a different larger number than what the summary is showing. Were these sales Veer sales that were reported back to SV?
Thanks!
Yes, I have the exact same questions. Any answers?
2854
« on: June 10, 2009, 16:10 »
Patience is a virtue...
2855
« on: June 09, 2009, 23:24 »
...I uploaded 20 images to test the waters.
Uhhh, how about tossing 2000 images on there. I promise you will have sales... 20 images... that's not a test. You expect that 20 images outsell SS or what? I don't understand.
2856
« on: June 09, 2009, 23:21 »
Dennis, you're so gonna be rich. Smart move. Best of luck to everyone.
2857
« on: June 09, 2009, 23:16 »
Am I overlooking something or am I blind? I do not see a place for checking sales stats..
Yeah, took me a while to figure that one out too... Supposedly it will show the sales in the "Dashboard" section. Hopefully I will see something there soon.
2858
« on: June 09, 2009, 19:24 »
@miskolin
Google for tutorials online that target super high res rendering. You will find lots of info there.
Put some money on the side every month. In no time you can get a refurbished Dell that has enough power to crank out the renders in several hours.
*Don't bash me for pushing Dell* It's just cheap...
2859
« on: June 09, 2009, 19:18 »
Now we're getting somewhere. Thanks for the info mentioned above. Got a point to start now.
2860
« on: June 09, 2009, 15:28 »
It's true. During my time in an advertising agency our clients had the $$$ for top notch images from RM agencies. They wanted RM back then and they want RM now - it's a matter of their business ethics and how they want to be perceived. In order to be unique you have to go RM.
I see Yuri's images eeeverywhere and that's good for him but I also know that those clients didn't spend a lot of money and also don't care (or don't know) how many more times these pictures are being used elsewhere. Whenever I see his images online for instance on a web hosting site where one of his models is wearing a headset (in the customer service section...), I know that she isn't working there. Not that I didn't now that other images at other sites actually display their real employees but in the end you want to present a unique and individual business. It turns into something generic. It feels more fake than other images that I haven't seen before. I hope you get my drift.
Another example. Take a portrait. It happened many times already where funky companies took microstock portraits for all kinds of weird ads. Porn sites, medical ads (hemorrhoids or STDs), political ads. So it could happen that one person is an online prostitute, who has an STD (go figure...) and campaigns for the program of a local politician. Serious businesses and advertising agencies take precautions so that never happens
Maybe the prices came down during the years but still if the buyer wants to have an image of a business team consisting out of one afro-american male, one caucasian female and an asian male in a high rise building, during a meeting so you can see the Empire State building right behind them, then there is no way around an RM agency.
That's what Zeus also meant. Some shots can not be done with a low budget - period. To isolate your apples and cell phones it doesn't matter how much or little you spend - it's still gonna be an isolated object. If you have Yuri's model gang doing their thing in a bright office is one story but it won't replace a shot of 3 business people at Times Square, if that is what the client wants.
Sometime the details make a huuuuge difference.
2861
« on: June 09, 2009, 10:04 »
@ Zeus - I think you are right on that one. Many but not all Macro shooters work that way so it's not just necessarily "you get what you put into it".
@gostwyck
I doubt that anyone can consider food shots as a niche. Again I might have worded that wrong.
I'm talking about shots of an award winning purebred German Shepard, jumping over a pile of fallen leaves on a sunny autumn day with motion blur for example.
Like I started this thread: Alamy takes almost everything. Therefore quality is overall a bit on the lower end. And it's nearly impossible to compare a macro agency with a micro agency.
You will find good food stock on macros but of course it's relatively "easy" to photograph a nicely prepared meal. For instance you don't need to hire 3 models or rent a huge studio... That's the reason why shots of that kind end up on the micros. There are 3 times more underwater shots on Alamy than SS the list goes on.
It's not about which agency has the most shots of whatever. It's about what trad agencies are out there that accept non-exclusive material...
2862
« on: June 09, 2009, 09:40 »
And what do you do, that during 6 hours of render time your 3DS doesn't freeze.
I use one of my other 3 computers... To me this is a business therefore I need the right tools and resources. If your computer freezes then something is wrong. It's supposed to be rendering. If I have a render oing for more than 24 hours I'm not going to do nothing. I need to have "backup".
2863
« on: June 09, 2009, 08:41 »
Well put.
2864
« on: June 09, 2009, 08:38 »
This should be called Marketplace BETA.
Too many issues.
Looks like they never tested the site before.
I wonder what the first potential buyers are thinking.
Anyone any sales yet?
2865
« on: June 09, 2009, 08:07 »
My renders take much longer than 15-20min (on a slower computer though). I usually set a few renders and let them finish over night.
What did I tell you...? An image like yours posted above would take me at least 6 hours to pump it out in a quality that I'm satisfied with. Quad Core, 4GB RAM, XP, 3DS at 4000x6000 pixels.
2866
« on: June 09, 2009, 08:04 »
SS currently has a library of 7M images and, at their current rate of growth of 90K new images per week (which has actually been steadily accelerating), will have over 30M by 2015. What subjects/needs won't be covered within that?
I'm not too sure about that statement. When you check various portfolios at Shutterstock, you quickly realize that 8 out of 10 almost look identical. Their best sellers could be from each others portfolio. Some really creative contributors come up with new unique ideas but seriously. There are those waves of concepts. A year ago it was the floral design vectors or all the grunge vectors. Now you have the vectors with 3 colored arrows pointing up or 4 colored backgrounds with silhouettes of people dancing in them. Out of those 90.000 images per week there are too many newbies (with inferior stock quality - not useless but not a real competition either) and lots of people copying each other. So I think it doesn't matter if SS has 5M. or 7M. images - the niches will still be small or not filled at all. In my opinion SS is accepting too much stuff as are other agencies. Quality has been going up but in many areas it is still sub-par. Still you see badly isolated shots with dirty gray edges etc. That stuff shouldn't be online. SS is following a different strategy rather than providing solely high quality images... And when you look at the Trads you will see more contributors with outstanding content than bad ones. Just because millions of freelance graphics designers and ad agencies keep buying from the Micros doesn't mean that thousands of big corporations don't need exclusive or RM material for their campaigns. RM is going to stay in one way or another. I dare to mention the example editorial. Let's say you covered a local event and upload it as editorial to SS, DT and BigStock. What are you getting out of this? 10 sales? 20? If you have 1 sale at Alamy you start with more money than all sales at the micros altogether... There is so much to consider when uploading to RM agencies. For one you want to make big $$$ by delivering fantastic content but on the other hand you want to cover niches/editorial that simply won't cut the cheese on the Micros.
2867
« on: June 09, 2009, 07:40 »
I told you before in another thread where you were asking about it: Increase your number of polygons.
No one can tell how many since it all depends on the size of each object.
There will be almost no shortcuts to nice renders except you use the MeshSmooth or TurboSmooth modifier in 3DS MAX (if you can depending on your object) or using a much faster computer.
Like mentioned before other people have to let their computer render for 12 hours or more if not renting a server farm in order to get complex scenes rendered in shorter times.
How long did your image take to be rendered?
2868
« on: June 08, 2009, 22:09 »
A lot of what you said I agree with except the above quote. I am anything but famous, not that ambitious (perhaps more patient) and have few connections. However I still see a lot of good sales come through. Had a $1700 sales today for a rather mundane image that would have been rejected for all the usual reasons if submitted to micro. A good image but not great, however it filled a niche for a customer that wanted something less used. An old image I might add, something like 15 years old.
I think I worded that wrong. First off, congrats to the sale. Surely many photographers get sales like these on a more or less regular basis. I don't know if you can expect such a sale every other day, twice a month or every 6 months. What I wanted to say was that those photographers that have a portfolio of 5.000 to 10.000 (or more) filled with top notch stock are more likely to get such sales (1000$ and up) than many of us "macro-water-testers" with 1000-2000 images on Alamy or any RM. As you read through the Alamy forums, there are plenty of photographers with 3.000 or 5.000 images that sometimes don't get more than 3 to 5 sales a month. Just because someone has tons of images doesn't mean they sell well... Still there are exceptions to the rule where the infamous mystery-photographer with 400 images can make a living... In the end I believe it's obvious that with more images in your portfolio you have a higher chance of selling something. Minimum requirement is that one understands RM otherwise you'll rarely get a sale...
2869
« on: June 08, 2009, 21:51 »
Same here. No FTP, NO Java upload. Their FTP server must have crashed.
2870
« on: June 08, 2009, 20:02 »
Somehow I didn't get notified when this thread gets answers...  Not that I blame them. If I was sitting on good returns from some not-commonly-known macro agencies I doubt I would be telling either. 
Well that's what I mean. Clipartof.com was a hidden gem until Dennis made THE move. Can't blame him - the referral program is the best I've seen and he will be making a sh!(load of money just from people who signed up on this forum (and another forum...). Now the upload queue is backup to the ceiling and god knows when the rest of us is getting their files online. I still have faith that there are lots of buyers out there and I'll be making some $$$ with them (sometime towards the end of this year...). Anywho. I've been with Alamy for over 4 years now and it was a nice ride so far. I produce not a lot of images but try to focus on 100% stock that sells and deliver quality. Those 50 images a week seems to me like torture and makes me feel like that I have to go and do a "job" in order to keep up. Well who cares anyway... Like mentioned above I think it's realistic to say that even (and most likely "especially") Makro shooters produce A LOT of content. Talk about quantity on the micros? Go check out the portfolios of Getty photographers... It's definitely not like "Yeah now I'm in a trad agency and can lean back with my 600 images and become filthy rich". Forget that. As with the Micros, getting more or less money (depending on where you sell) you have Makro shooters on Getty getting as low as $2 for a shot since Getty tossed their RM images into the subscription plan that got them into a class action lawsuit. Who can blame them...? But of course you can also rake in thousands of $$$ for a single RM sale. I'd assume though that those sales mostly appear for really, really ambitious and famous photographers that have connections, reputation and most likely a studio etc. (or spend quite some $$$ on expenses for their landscape shots). Some Getty shooters have over 150.000 images in their ports - and they are not studios like iofoto or Yuri. Of course it took them years (decades) to get a collection like that but that's what the RMs want. I know there are plenty of agencies. But and that's the key, how do you find out which agency is right for you? I think I couldn't even go through the list of all the RM agencies checking their requirements and knocking at their door. There are simply too many. Well, it's like lotto then. Maybe you get lucky one day, finding a few good performing agencies...
2871
« on: June 08, 2009, 19:35 »
FTP errors as far as I can see. I used CoreFTP, Filezilla and CuteFTP - none of them worked. CoreFTP just failed completely couldn't even get passed authorization. Filezilla and CuteFTP got through authorization but were unable to read directory and disconnected. Yes I did set it to explicit TSL/SSL. The design reminds me a bit of Lucky Oliver *getting chills*. I didn't find it intuitive at all. Content is all cluttered. Too many tabs all over the page. Some on the top some on the bottom. I will get used to it but I've never seen something like this. I can't even find a link where it displays my sales. No matter where I click on I just feel like I'm getting lost. So many links... Twitter, Flick, Virb...  What does the link "Create new portfolio" mean? Why does the system tell me that there is a job available in my area as a PHP developer? Why would I want to apply there? Is this a job search site? Also it says "powered by Authentic Jobs"... Oohh I found it.... The "Dashboard"... How could I miss that - of course - dashboard means "Sales statistics"...  Seriously: Dashboard. Every hero has a secret lair, and any decent secret lair has a wall of screens showing you what's going on, at a glance. This is yours. Use the dashboard to track the status of your submissions. Later, you'll also find information about your sales and earnings. Lucky Oliver comes back to mind. Is anyone from your staff into Warcraft? I'll see how Veer works out in the next few months. I hope it's worth all the funky design and language on the site. I wonder who the buyers are...  I don't know...
2872
« on: June 07, 2009, 19:18 »
Alamy takes pretty much everything you throw at them.
But are there any other non-exclusive macros that have higher standards?
Furthermore I'm not asking for uploads that I have to pay for like that Getty deal. They're exclusive anyway...
I know most people don't speak about this but maybe someone might be kind enough...
Looking for lifestyle, landscape and creative agencies.
2873
« on: June 07, 2009, 18:52 »
Yes you are right. They are undercutting all other agencies' prices. As some members of this forum agree, Revostock will attract all stock footage buyers from Shutterstock, Istock, Pond5 and all other footage agencies on this planet and take their competition out of business. I planned ahead and uploaded my videos to them, because what are you going to do once SS and IS is shutting down because all their buyers ran away...
2874
« on: June 05, 2009, 23:32 »
Just to pour some oil into the fire...: Does anyone really know HOW the micros (or any of them) are processing credit cards? I was also under the impression that when a buyer pays with credit card the information is being verified with the credit card company BEFORE the credits are transferred to the buyer's account. Why on earth would someone transfer credits to an account without checking if the card is valid or not  A friend of mine mentioned that there is software available that just verifies possible combinations of credit card type, account numbers and expiration dates. So is it that those agencies that hand down refunds to the photographers ONLY check the given credit card information with such software BUT process the cards later during the month? Reason for that: MONEY. Supposedly an instant verification for a valid credit card means having a merchant account or something like that where the agency would have to pay processing fees etc. to the credit card companies. By just using the software they accept credit cards on a trust basis until they finally bill them and find out that they are non-existing cards or stolen. Is this possible? Also like mentioned before. If a credit card is stolen, all involved parties (except of the thief) are (usually) not liable. The credit card company takes the hit. If anyone had his/her credit card ever stolen knows that the cc company protects you from theft.
2875
« on: June 03, 2009, 08:29 »
it's too late darlings.
even retiring from micros you sold already your pics as RF, people with RF can do whatever they want, forever and for any kind of commercial purpose.
your images are "lost".
you better decide once and for all to stay on micros or to stay on macros. there's no middle way.
i'm trying micros now just to sell some crap i can't sell well on macros and for what i've no hope whatsoever about price etc, just for fun and for the sake of it.
I wish I had your time. Maybe as a Trads shooter one has a lot more time to upload, keyword and categorize "crap" images instead of hanging out on the yacht to celebrate the fantastic earnings from RM sales. I wonder why you would post such a statement on a Microstock forum just to let everyone know that the images "that don't sell well on the macros" are considered crap (which by your standards belong into Microstock). So there is no "middle way", eyh? So what you are doing now is "just" something else  Old Hippie, it's all not making sense. There are Micro shooters who just got into the business with small ports and little experience but don't forget that this industry has been around for 5 years now and some of us do make a living off of it. Some of us are already with other Trad agencies, creating a second income stream. Why wouldn't that be true? Ahh right, because you said so...
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|