Funnily enough I had a run of 3 subs and a sod for 33c was quite an old picture with fairly average sales struck me as odd

Quote from: Justanotherphotographer on January 13, 2016, 13:19

I agree IS has started rejecting vectors again. Of course totally randomly and some of my best sellers as you'd expect from IS.

iStock rejects random vectors for random reasons; Dreamstime rejects icons and stamps for being "too simple" and similars for being too similar (even though their submission process encourages uploading similars; Fotolia rejects designs with Greek type in place, even though they sell more often; and Shutterstock accepts them all and wipes the floor with the other three.

Although Shutterstock seems to reject some contributors work for no discernible reason........that Mstock get used to it ;-)
 

Quote from: Jo Ann Snover on January 07, 2016, 19:18

I think Getty has scored one of the most amazing own goals, and that they are right now left with very few options.

Jo Ann:

Getty executives should read your post carefully but I doubt they would grasp a thing. Unfortunately the management at Getty/Istock is that bad nowadays............

If they can read that is........they certainly can't read the 10ft high writing on the wall

It's exactly the same sales pattern on SS this year as it has been for a long time. January is always a bit of a slow month, especially at the start - and I've been with SS for 12 Januaries.
Pauws - if you've seen the sun this morning you ain't where I am! South Wales is just notching up its 67th consecutive day with rain, which must be a bit of a record even for Wales. The sky has definitely been falling!

Not quite that bad in Essex but seemingly grey for months for what its worth I'm having a fairly reasonable January after a horrible Dec on SS but well within the range of statistical variability

Why do you care?
Why do you think anyone would bother to work it out for you?

I do not have any trust in Norton.

Why do you say that?

Not good for sales either :-(

Norton antivirus has advised me not to visit the site

Here is a complete list: (for more information about a specific threat, click on the Threat Name below)

Threat Name: Web Attack: Fake Scan Webpage 7
Location: http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-102121610/stock-photo-security-breach-in-green-revealed-in-blue-computer-code-through-a-magnifying-glass

Threat Name: Direct Link To Web Attack: Fake Scan Webpage 7
Location: http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-102121610/stock-photo-security-breach-in-green-revealed-in-blue-computer-code-through-a-magnifying-glass

Should I just leave it and hope they sort it out......can't visit their site to report it!

last sale January 31 used to get the rare odd sale......its so easy to upload I carry on clinging to some kind of irrational hope........

I know a lot of people have issues with this outfit.....but this might get them ahead of DT but a long way behind the "big three" I think.

I would return mine for poor lighting or focus  like they do for 90% of my pics

I imagine it's as real as the YA gold award. You can justify it however you like. Ss is a site not a collection, a collection has to be by one artist, for example.

Does it? Who says?