401
General Stock Discussion / Re: Adobe Stock Fashion - Mockery
« on: September 17, 2016, 09:23 »
Even bad promotion can be a good promotion. I bet that Adobe is getting even better visibility because of this mockery.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 401
General Stock Discussion / Re: Adobe Stock Fashion - Mockery« on: September 17, 2016, 09:23 »
Even bad promotion can be a good promotion. I bet that Adobe is getting even better visibility because of this mockery.
402
Shutterstock.com / Re: New content sale stopped?« on: September 16, 2016, 01:24 »
Sales at Shutterstock in September are very low... not even close to last year when we had much less footage online. Something is wrong at their side, that's sure.
403
General - Stock Video / Re: Our experience in stock video industry« on: September 15, 2016, 06:41 »
Looks like a closed system of contributors where they only have best clips online. Maybe it wont hurt sending them own portfolio if anything suits their taste.
It depends who their buyers are... i doubt that they sell clips for low prices. It would be interesting to have clips on their site to run some statistics. 404
General Stock Discussion / Re: Best stock agency to sell high quality videos??« on: September 15, 2016, 03:54 »
Investing a lot of money in to heavy machinery while you don't even try doing unique footage with what you already have? Isn't that a bit naive?
Sorry, don't get me wrong, but with your video portfolio you have online, I doubt you'll get in to RM. You'll do even worse with exclusive on Getty/iStock. Just a hint... it's not the equipment that does valuable footage, but the person behind it. And judging on what you already have, it would be more suitable to invest in high quality sets and make great footage with equipment you have, sell it on two or three RF agencies and enjoy the income. Sorry if we destroyed your plans. It's still your decision on what you want to do. 405
General - Stock Video / Our experience in stock video industry« on: September 15, 2016, 03:28 »
We have been contributing stock video for few years and we've started a website putting some experiences and tips for contributors and buyers.
It will slowly grow and receive many useful information, tips, how to and statistics. Maybe we will even start some courses (depends on ). Your input would be useful too, that is why we are posting website here. Link: http://video-stock.org If this topic doesn't suit forum rules, you can delete it. 406
Pond5 / Re: Pricing on Pond5« on: September 13, 2016, 04:47 »Pond5 has completely died since May for me (for footage), and I actually panicked and LOWERED my prices... No change so far. I sold regular HD clips for $150, and they were NOT unique or very hard to film. Interesting thought under the line... Making a music video would cost more thousands of dollars, at least (professionals would charge more than ten thousands). If clips are $99 on stock sites, it would actually be cheaper to make it from stock footage. If we are talking about hobby music videos, sure it's expensive... event $6 would be too much. Just my thought, because I work in both part of video production industry. 407
General Stock Discussion / Re: Microstock Poll Results Video VS Photos« on: April 04, 2016, 02:19 »
I would be very happy as primary videographer to see separate pools too.
408
General - Stock Video / Re: Nobody should price HD clip below $49 on Pond5 if you upload to VideoBlocks too.« on: January 08, 2016, 02:31 »
And what would you do, if other stock sites start to lower your clips from $79 to $49, because you are under-pricing clips elsewhere? It happened to me.
|
|