MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - GeoPappas
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 51
727
« on: April 05, 2007, 19:55 »
Didn't the subscription fee go up from $189 to $199 (for a single month)? I guessed a 5% increase because this reflects the subscription fee increase.
Incorrect. The monthly price increased from $159 to $199, or about 25%. Other subscriptions (quarterly, yearly, etc) increased about 25% as well.
728
« on: April 05, 2007, 09:00 »
They also increased prices to buyers by about 25% recently.
730
« on: April 04, 2007, 11:07 »
I think that the following quote from Fotolia President is quite interesting:
"As he describes it, the microstock model is the picture of efficiency. Submissions pour in electronically from photographers, who get 50 percent or more of the proceeds of each sale."
I know that I'm not getting 50% from Fotolia! Are any of you?
731
« on: April 02, 2007, 09:51 »
How many images (on average) do you have online?
732
« on: March 30, 2007, 17:50 »
Bobby:
Congrats. You have some fantastic shots. Most of us are striving to join you in the limelight one day.
733
« on: March 30, 2007, 16:01 »
I requested a payout yesterday morning for $600.
Must be nice
734
« on: March 30, 2007, 12:19 »
Fotolia:
Global Headquarters Fotolia LLC 41 East 11th Street, 11th Floor New York, NY 10003 USA Tel: 718-577-1321
For some reason, I don't think that Chad, Eugenie, or the others are in NY.
735
« on: March 30, 2007, 09:45 »
I saw those addresses on the web sites, but they didn't seem correct to me for some reason.
Is SS really in NY?
As for 123RF, I'm not looking for the parent corporation (Inmagine), but the actual location of 123RF itself. For some reason I thought that it was located in Europe. Is it really in Hong Kong?
736
« on: March 30, 2007, 09:08 »
Where are the main offices of the major microstock sites physically located?
Here is what I have so far (please correct me if I am incorrect): iStock - Calgary, Canada Dreamstime - Bucharest, Romania Stockxpert - Budapest, Hungary Bigstock - Davis, CA LuckyO - Campbell, CA
Shutterstock - ? Fotolia - ? 123RF - ?
737
« on: March 27, 2007, 21:21 »
...you would have to review 189 images a minute, or 3 images a second.
I think that your math is off a little. 1500 images/day = 187.5 images/hr (if we assume an 8 hour day) = 3.125 images/min = 1 image every 19.2 sec If we use 1000 images/day, it turns out to be 1 image every 28.8 sec. Still seems extremely fast for reviewing an image (especially since there is overhead for loading the image and approving/disapproving it), but at least it is more accurate.
738
« on: March 26, 2007, 10:07 »
What do you think?
Are you using a wide-angle lens. For some reason, some of the photos look like they have wide-angle distortion.
739
« on: March 25, 2007, 09:49 »
I have dealt with B&H for over 15 years. They are an extremely reputable company. They used to have the best deals on photo equipment, but with the advent of the internet you can find things cheaper elsewhere. But cheaper is not necessarily always better.
I recently purchased a Canon EOS 30D from them last fall. I got the camera and took about a half-dozen shots and the camera threw an Err 99. I turned off the camera and I tried everything recommended (take out the battery for a long period of time, etc), but the camera would never turn back on. As with eendicott, they emailed me a pre-paid UPS shipping label to return the camera. I was extremely surprised that they would pay for shipping on a returned product. They took the camera back and shipped me a new one within a week. That is great customer service.
I'm not sure how they would handle your situation, since you are shipping the product to Florida, but might be returning the product from Canada. You might want to just give them a call and ask them about shipping to Canada. I'm sure that they do it all the time.
740
« on: March 24, 2007, 06:06 »
Just closed my account after one week. With about 150 images there was only one sale in 7 days. Strange but true, this one sale that was accepted on the second day, was rejected today.
Never got this kind of work where an images was accepted, than sold and after rejected and taken out of database.
Did they say why it was rejected?
741
« on: March 23, 2007, 21:40 »
Yes, I think that images of models that are not in their teens or early 20s should sell quite well.
In this particular image, I'm not crazy about the lighting, especially the dark shadow over the right eye and the over-exposure on the right-side of the head.
742
« on: March 23, 2007, 15:45 »
"Greetings!
Im with the Center of the American West, a non-profit organization through the University of Colorado at Boulder, and I want to let you know that one of your photos was used in a Report from the Center entitled, What Every Westerner Should Know About Energy Efficiency and Conservation. Due credit for your photo was given on page 66 of the report under Image Credits. You can visit our website and check out other reports if youd like. Thank you for the use of your work.
Shawna Riley Center of the American West http://www.centerwest.org [email protected]"
Well! Gone to the site... downloaded the report... but! Only 52 pages! and the report was published in 2003! LOL. What do u think?
Spooky! I got the exact same email!?!?!
743
« on: March 22, 2007, 18:05 »
I just did a Google and found out his username on IS is dmbaker.
I have also sent him an message on IS.
745
« on: March 21, 2007, 12:57 »
BTW, what is the search that you are using on Google to find your images?
746
« on: March 21, 2007, 12:02 »
Yes, noticed that too, otoh, I have some images with comments too, surely they would have to show up aswell?
Yes, that would seem like it should make sense. When were the comments added? Maybe it just takes some time for them to get indexed by Google?
748
« on: March 21, 2007, 09:00 »
Hey, thanks for the free marketing
749
« on: March 21, 2007, 07:08 »
Give them to kids. Kids love stickers.
750
« on: March 20, 2007, 06:43 »
Does anyone know what is going on at IS that their servers seem to be down?
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 51
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|