Nic plugins aren't to bad either. lots of adjustment. And free
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: jcpjr on March 18, 2017, 14:11Ditto. What's going on?
Just wish I could see some sale here. Haven't had a sale in over a year with over 400 images on line.
Quote from: AlessandraRC on April 24, 2017, 14:23Correct! Hoping for a little help from the moon. Half moon rising from the east is what I'll have on the dates I'm there. I'm going to have to be creative I'm sure. I'll post a shot or two if I'm successful.
photography is light reflected. No light no photography. Plus the turtles move during their egg-laying activities.
Quote from: increasingdifficulty on April 22, 2017, 11:01I agree. I'm using a Nikon D750 which has one of the best low light AF systems of all Nikon products. That's why I was hoping for a full mean during May. I've had excellent results so far.
No, but it sounds interesting!
Unless you have a super sensitive moonlight camera (or maybe a Sony a7s II), most night nature photography utilize artificial light.
Quote from: FrankyDM on April 21, 2017, 06:40Yes. Just getting used to their setup. I was concerned that the file data wasn't attached and now I see that it is. All is good. Thanks for your quick response.Quote from: jcpjr on April 20, 2017, 13:14Could you explain a little more? Where do you want to see the keywords? Do you mean see the keywords on the ESP site when you do a revision?
Thanks Franky. That helped me. Now how do I see the keywords for the files?
Thanks
Quote from: ShadySue on April 19, 2017, 13:45Thanks Sue. I Agree.Quote from: jcpjr on April 19, 2017, 12:56I have kept and copied over all my HDD the email I got from iS assuring me that any liability was totally on the buyer.
I guess it's on the stock sites to control this. Not much we can do about it.
Quote from: PigsInSpace on December 16, 2016, 00:01I started uploading editorials for awhile now with fair success. Funny, one is a shot of pool deck on a popular cruise line and it has loads of people and property. D/L many times.
I have a handful of editorials, and it really depends on the photo. I second the message about time sensitive photos not having a lot of long term value, although that's just a gut feeling, as I haven't done a lot in the way of that. The editorial photos I have up are of buildings/locations where it would be impossible to remove all the logos or where doing so would end up removing the subject of the image (copyrighted building design, sigh). I'd rather have them as commercial, since they would have more value, but that's obviously not going to happen, and they do sell.
When in doubt, err on the side of submitting.
Quote from: cathyslife on August 30, 2016, 22:01Quote from: jcpjr on August 30, 2016, 21:30Quote from: cathyslife on August 30, 2016, 19:01Quote from: jcpjr on August 30, 2016, 16:59
Say what you want...it's called "checks and balances". If the map is reporting sales and the summary isn't then there is a problem somewhere. I've got image sales indicated on the map and not the summary and that my friends is an issue....checks and balances! I'm sure it will be fixed in due time....they always do.
The map was never meant to be a check and balance...it was meant as a general idea of sales and a fun widget. You guys are the ones who are claiming that the map should be correct and match exactly with your sales summary. As far as I know, Shutterstock has never said that. Show me on the site where they claim that the map matches exactly, and I will shut my piehole. :-)
Geez Cathy can't we have a conversation here without saber rattling. I thought that's what this site was for...conversation. Sorry....I'm out...
Saber rattling? LOL. As if no one else here ever does that!
I am out too. Of this topic, that is.