1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???
« on: January 11, 2018, 16:24 »
zero sales since i started the thread
maybe others have decent sales

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: January 11, 2018, 16:24 »
zero sales since i started the thread
![]() 2
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: November 16, 2017, 03:59 »11 sales last month, only 2 sales this month. Overall average of 6 sales per month with a port of 130 videos. So do you see any improvement after the rebranding of videoblocks ? 3
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: November 16, 2017, 03:57 »Been waiting several weeks on some test files. Still just sitting there in the queue. me too, its been a month since some files are in queue, like they frozen everything. well I have a very small port of 150 but still... 4
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: November 16, 2017, 03:52 »Just curious. I have a small port and my sales are a big ZERO on storyblocks. I am with them since this summerAre you talking about video or photos? Yes you made your point and yes I was talking about photos. well I guess maybe they are trying to convince the videoblocks clients to also buy photos from them and it seems its not working ![]() 5
General Stock Discussion / Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: November 15, 2017, 10:08 »
Just curious. I have a small port and my sales are a big ZERO on storyblocks. I am with them since this summer
6
Shutterstock.com / Re: Good lord, what did SS screw up now?« on: November 09, 2017, 11:18 »
OMG I just checked and I get this message : "This contributor has no active images in their portfolio."
![]() ![]() ![]() 7
Shutterstock.com / Re: New submission editor page« on: November 07, 2017, 01:26 »
It looks almost identical as Adobe Stock interface
![]() 8
123RF / Re: 123 new license option - Simply Stunning« on: November 04, 2017, 15:05 »Jeff HK, sailor and during his trips delivering cargo he shoots photos and videos. Amateur I'd say, probably the best time lapse you'll ever watch now this is Simply Stunning ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks for sharing !!! 9
MicrostockSubmitter / Re: Trying Stock Submitter« on: October 29, 2017, 06:55 »
you could try xpiks that is totaly free and has a very clean interface but it does not submit your content like stocksubmitter an you will still have to visit the sites to finish your upload process
10
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock views statistics Lost but Found by accident« on: October 29, 2017, 06:49 »
Unfortunately I dont have a fotolia account because i am relatively new but maybe this info will benefit the people that olny have AS accounts
11
Adobe Stock / Adobe Stock views statistics Lost but Found by accident« on: October 29, 2017, 03:59 »
I recently did a image search on some of my images and found one of them on some site that seems to be partner with fotolia and to my surprise I could see the number of views and downloads. I checked the number of downloads on Adobe stock and it was the same so it makes sense that also the views to be from AS
here is the link: https://gamesageddon.com/stock I am really missing the view statistics because its an indicator of what buyers search for and on how to improve your images or keywords and many other things. I dont understand why so many stock sites choose to blind us from this client interaction. ![]() 12
Shutterstock.com / Re: keeps getting rejected« on: October 25, 2017, 01:08 »
one more thing I forgot to mention is that about a month ago I uploaded 3 videos of the same camera and all have been approved for comercial use without any logo removed. So they accept videos but not photos of the same subject
13
Shutterstock.com / Re: keeps getting rejected« on: October 24, 2017, 15:27 »It;s not just the rollei that is identifiable, the Zeiss Jena lens with the Exacta mount is even more obvious. The twin lens camera is a Seagull, and the other two are an Exacta vx500 and a Kodac Retina with a folding lens. I guess I will submit as editorial ( I allready got the third rejection and I am not going to insist anymore ) I am a little frustrated about this. good thing I only made just 3 concepts to test the waters... Thank you all for explaining and helping 14
Shutterstock.com / Re: keeps getting rejected« on: October 24, 2017, 12:54 »
Its so frustrating because all agencyes AS, IS, Alamy, pond5, storyblocks accepted this items....
Just another question: If I am selling comercial on other sites is it ok to sell editorial on SS ? 15
Shutterstock.com / Re: keeps getting rejected« on: October 24, 2017, 04:17 »
Intellectual Property -- Image potentially infringes on another person's intellectual property rights (e.g., image contains artwork, writing, sheet music, or objects protected by copyright).
16
Shutterstock.com / keeps getting rejected« on: October 24, 2017, 03:52 »
I dont understand why this image gets rejected for the second time. I have removed all the logos an even serial numbers from the cameras and lenses and they still rejected this photo and others like this one from the same batch. Some other agencies like istock and Adobe Stock accepted the files with no problem after logo retouching. Maybe there is someone who also made similar photos that can give me any advice ?
17
Photo Critique / Re: Hi everyone! Need critique! Thanks in advance!« on: October 23, 2017, 05:15 »
Hi, I am also a novice but from what I have learned on this forum I think you have to many similar images. I looked at your fruit and vegetables and you have 3 pages of an apple splashing the water that is about 300 images. I agree there are diferent stiles of splashes but I think about 5 or 10 would have been more than enough IMO. Other than that your tehnique is very nice
![]() 18
Adobe Stock / Re: Two new Adobe Stock features« on: October 20, 2017, 06:14 »
Unfortunately I dont see any way to delete collections. the only option I see is to remove all the pictures in that collection and again about the cover picture there is no way of changing it yet. We just have to wait and see how fast Adobe will make the appropriate adjustment for our request ![]() 19
Adobe Stock / Re: Two new Adobe Stock features« on: October 19, 2017, 01:40 »Thanks, Mat, for letting us know about this fine new feature. This is what I ended up doing: 1.Select the cover picture for the collection ( The cover picture is the first picture you start your selection ) 2.Click add to collection 3.Name your Collection 4.Keep adding to that collection in small numbers just to avoid the frustration of any errors (at least in this early stage of development ) 20
Adobe Stock / Re: Two new Adobe Stock features« on: October 19, 2017, 01:32 »
It would be helpful for the client to have access to all of our collections and not be limited to just two - you could make a link button " see other collections "
21
Adobe Stock / Re: Anyone having problems uploading to Adobe Stock?« on: October 08, 2017, 15:16 »
same here...I am using google chrome
22
Pond5 / Re: woooow my first sale on POND5« on: September 29, 2017, 08:36 »after a year of nothingness well, yes it was an image sale...after a year of selling nothing (pics or video) I decided to lower the price from 10 $ to 5 $ per image. I set the price for my video at 40 $ (previously 50 $ ) I know 5$ for an image is low but what do you think the minimum should be ? I am not at a profesional level... 23
Pond5 / woooow my first sale on POND5« on: September 29, 2017, 06:24 »
after a year of nothingness
![]() It made me 2.50 $. I have 100 photos and 13 videos, so its a very very very small port. glad I could finaly see that happy email ![]() 24
General Stock Discussion / Re: Graphicstock is now Storyblocks« on: September 18, 2017, 09:00 »
I have reset my password because of the same problem and it worked
25
iStockPhoto.com / Re: ESP strange message ????« on: September 15, 2017, 13:21 »
Yes, It was a bug. I was worried about my computer or account beeing hacked. I use google chrome wich autoupdates itself and my pc has the right time
![]() |
Submit Your Vote
|