1
123RF / Re: How to select price tier for footage?
« on: October 03, 2016, 04:00 »
I always select v3. Already selected one is indicated in red color.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
123RF / Re: How to select price tier for footage?« on: October 03, 2016, 04:00 »
I always select v3. Already selected one is indicated in red color.
2
123RF / Re: Review time at 123« on: September 27, 2016, 04:48 »
123RF hardly review or sell any videos. That's not the place to put your videos.
3
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime Revealing Contributors' Real Names and Location on the Website« on: September 26, 2016, 20:03 »Some people have also businesses in other fields and might not want to be associated with the micros. Right, I would close my port if any of the agencies that I submit reveal my real name. It's better if they let us select the name we want to show in copyright statement, like SS do. Unfortunately, agencies like 123RF show username in copyright statement (but it's still better than showing real name). 4
Shutterstock.com / Re: Oh boy, the Bullsh%t rejections are back« on: September 08, 2016, 05:18 »
SHUTTERSTOCK STATS: 100,021,310 royalty-free stock images / 793,420 new stock images added this week
5
General Stock Discussion / Re: find a port on SS with stolen images« on: September 06, 2016, 06:15 »Hi,I am new to this,sorry by mistake i copied your element,No worries i deleted that illustrations immediately.Thanks for understanding. Delete all your illustrations. All clip arts are copied from other sources. 6
General Stock Discussion / Re: find a port on SS with stolen images« on: September 05, 2016, 19:39 »
Yes, same person.
I just pointed out one of his work. However, if you examine his port carefully, most of his illustrations consist of stolen components. Apparently, he is new to the business, but it's just matter of time that his port will be banned across agencies. 7
General Stock Discussion / Re: find a port on SS with stolen images« on: September 05, 2016, 07:05 »
Latest infringer in SS: https://www.shutterstock.com/g/r_D_r
Original image: https://graphicleftovers.com/graphic/face-of-santa-claus/ Reproduced image: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-477949966 8
123RF / Re: 123RF - New contributor dashboard« on: September 05, 2016, 06:58 »https://www.shutterstock.com/g/r_D_r Too bad we cannot down vote these crap anymore. 9
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: September 02, 2016, 01:11 »
Now they know how to say sorry.
It would be better if they can inform contributors when something goes wrong in their site. Then we don't have to panic, but just wait till they fix it. 10
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: August 31, 2016, 04:39 »
Today I had a double sale of same image which are shown in daily earnings, but non of them are reported in map.
11
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: August 30, 2016, 04:24 »
Let's see whether SS will send us an email with exact missing mount. If they had the loss, sure they would.
12
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: August 30, 2016, 04:14 »
Today I also had two sales with no income
13
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: August 26, 2016, 00:52 »Before to write the post I have tried the search "broken map shutterstock" but the engine did not answered, sorry. http://www.microstockgroup.com/shutterstock-com/ 14
123RF / Re: 123RF site down ?« on: August 23, 2016, 20:18 »
Probably it's only you: http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/123rf.com.html
15
123RF / Re: how to bath edit key words in 123rf ?« on: August 23, 2016, 02:27 »
Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm afraid that it's not possible.
16
Shutterstock.com / Re: Most popular/most recent screwup« on: August 22, 2016, 20:07 »Check now. My images are back almost the same. #1 shot is back in #1 - the rest are close. Yep, mine are back in previous order as well. 17
Shutterstock.com / Re: Most popular/most recent screwup« on: August 19, 2016, 00:53 »Anyone else noticed, that some of the sales don't show on a map? I had 1 sale yesterday and 1 today, and neither of them showed up on a world map. They would say map is for just fun... 18
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS Clawback« on: August 16, 2016, 01:27 »I had a couple so its not half of total....no email yet. I noticed the magic words "we apologize for our error" seem to be missing. They don't apologize anymore, but assume that it's all common knowledge. 19
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS Clawback« on: August 15, 2016, 19:54 »
And have they explained why recently accepted images are not shown in the port?
I don't understand how the overall user experience is better now, my experience was definitely better before. 20
Shutterstock.com / Re: Most popular/most recent screwup« on: August 12, 2016, 01:38 »Ok, I think I figured how the new algorithm works, if this is indeed a more permanent algorithm change. I think new ranking system gives more weight to lifetime downloads of an image. Older images with more downloads are ranked higher than new images with less downloads. Apparently, uploaded date really doesn't matter, more the number of downloads, higher the rank. Yep, veterans will be benefited more. 21
Shutterstock.com / Re: New (recent) image sales - Shutterstock« on: August 10, 2016, 06:07 »
You are not alone.
22
Shutterstock.com / Re: Interesting article about profits vs. revenues« on: August 10, 2016, 04:03 »I am finding adobe is continuing to gain ground at the expense of ss and IS any references? 23
General - Top Sites / Re: Fotolia no sales« on: August 03, 2016, 07:00 »Hi, I started recently, got some 50-80 files on FT, IS and SS. While with IS and SS I started having downloads right after uploading some 20 files, FT has zero movement for me, some views and that's all. While I understand that my portfolio is still tiny, I was expecting at least a fraction of what is happening for me at IS and SS to get me going. Probably you don't have what FT customers need. In my experience, best sellers at FT and SS are different. I don't know much about IS, but I guess IS is closer to SS with compared to FT. 24
123RF / Re: 123RF - New contributor dashboard« on: August 02, 2016, 22:20 »So it's months over there? That's too bad. In my experience, current review times are: RF footage (slowest: few months) > RF images > Editorial footage > Editorial images (fastest: few days) 25
123RF / Re: 123RF - New contributor dashboard« on: August 02, 2016, 20:06 »Hello everyone,They are queued for review. But the review of RF footage is really slow there. More often than not, it takes few months. |
|