|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - noam
26
« on: November 01, 2009, 07:20 »
Hi all,
I came across something strange today, I have found a portfolio of 814 files, the most downloaded file have 4 download, and the photographer have a gold rank. How is that possible?
27
« on: September 13, 2009, 00:38 »
This is too old script which dont convert to image 16bit, not making new 50%transparecy darken layer with despecle filter or even more actions.
Too simple to be useful for most images for reasampling.
Its better to make few actions...
I was referring to how to resize a batch of differently cropped images to the required 48mb size, regardless of their original sizes. With this action, that is exactly what one could do. The only problem is that the script runs only on opened images, so you have to open all of the images you want to resize in PS and then batch process them. Anyway, I can always add any other task to the same action if I want to. And why do I need to convert to 16bit, or add a new 50% transparency layer, regarding image resize for Alamy?
29
« on: August 31, 2009, 00:56 »
How did you get rid of the flickering?
I don't really know. I shoot them at the rate of a frame every 7 to 10 seconds, compressed, and save them at 24fps. Luckily it works for me.
30
« on: August 30, 2009, 19:18 »
Hi leaf. Cool (literaly) video you got there. I have (for now) 4 time lapse video clips in my SS gallery here: http://footage.shutterstock.com/videos.html?submitter_id=109921I did them all in photoshop cs4 first working in raw file converter, cropping to 1080x1920px removing all spots, and saving as jpeg in a new folder. Then I open them all as a video layer in PS CS4 learn here how: http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/video_workshop/?id=vid0027 - the link doesn't seem to work right, the video you should look for is "working with image sequence" and than exporting them into a quicktime movie, in jpeg-photo compression. Noam
31
« on: July 25, 2009, 12:09 »
I try to shoot images that have a clear message or purpose, are colorful and easy to use and technically well done. I think that draws people to my portfolio, and I have plenty of buyers that say they keep coming back because they like my work. I guess that's my "brand".
I totally agree, but oops, Sean, you just gave us a tip!!!
32
« on: July 21, 2009, 17:11 »
Facebook,twitter,etc...
Is it get better with these...!?
Is there a way to know? I do not see how it could help? DT is now connected to your Facebook account but shall I spam my friends to buy my photos?
My Twitter followers are not exactly my friends, and I find it nice to let my FB friends and twitter followers to know what I have been doing recently in my microstok work. If I get any downloads, I don't know if they came from there.
33
« on: April 25, 2009, 07:29 »
July 25, 2008
Overall rank 2833
7 days rank 778
August 27, 2008
Overall rank 2245
7 days rank 458
September 26, 2008
Overall rank 1864
7 days rank 479
October 03, 2008
Overall rank 1774
7 days rank 398
October 29, 2008
Overall rank 1589
7 days rank 518
November 24, 2008
Overall rank 1378
7 days rank 337
December 26, 2008
Overall rank 1230
7 days rank 377
February 01, 2009
Overall rank 1130
7 days rank 458
March 17, 2009
Overall rank 999
7 days rank 446
April 25, 2009
Overall rank 889
7 days rank 302
34
« on: April 23, 2009, 17:32 »
35
« on: April 16, 2009, 17:24 »
D3 and happy
36
« on: April 02, 2009, 17:11 »
Subs: 67%
OD: 22%
EL:11%
Up 0.75% over my previous BME back in December.
37
« on: March 20, 2009, 15:19 »
I would stay out of the server stuff if you don't know what you're doing and just use Filiezilla the simple way: local to (microstock agency) server.
Wow, that's mind blowing information. Please do teach us, if you don't mind, how to do that remote to remote file transfer from our machine with Filezilla. After all I suppose most of us are here to get educated. Thanks a lot.
38
« on: March 18, 2009, 01:19 »
ahhhhh... yes, I think about them every day and put myself through a guilt trip. I have been a little busy lately  I really hope to post them soon.
No pressure, just curiosity.
39
« on: March 18, 2009, 01:17 »
Thanks,
Maybe I will try their free subscription and see how it goes.
If income will increase in (much) more than subscription fee so why not?
41
« on: March 17, 2009, 16:29 »
What happened to the results?
42
« on: March 17, 2009, 03:18 »
July 25, 2008
Overall rank 2833
7 days rank 778
August 27, 2008
Overall rank 2245
7 days rank 458
September 26, 2008
Overall rank 1864
7 days rank 479
October 03, 2008
Overall rank 1774
7 days rank 398
October 29, 2008
Overall rank 1589
7 days rank 518
November 24, 2008
Overall rank 1378
7 days rank 337
December 26, 2008
Overall rank 1230
7 days rank 377
February 01, 2009
Overall rank 1130
7 days rank 458
first time with overall under 1000
Overall rank 999
7 days rank 446
44
« on: March 12, 2009, 08:20 »
Idea List
Service Vehicles
Industrial Vehicles
Big Smiles (people smiling)
Depression
Farm Animals
Summer Portrait
Girls /women at the beach
desert
scriptures
wonders of the world
macro shots
farming and agriculture
bugs
Fitness
Money
holidays
vacations
family
45
« on: February 27, 2009, 11:32 »
Here is the legend-key from the bottom of the uploaded files tab in the my files page: 
46
« on: February 19, 2009, 18:24 »
Beautiful. Thanks
47
« on: February 01, 2009, 18:50 »
Hi J
I figure there is always a back up version at the agency but the Macros make you pay full price for your own work so it might get pricey to download your entire portfolio if you wanted to, If you want to.
You are wrong about that. 123rf lets you download all your files for free. You can read all about it here: http://www.123rf.com/blog/blog.php?idblog=b1000006  Noam
48
« on: February 01, 2009, 03:56 »
Overall rank 2833
7 days rank 778
Overall rank 2245
7 days rank 458
Overall rank 1864
7 days rank 479
Overall rank 1774
7 days rank 398
Overall rank 1589
7 days rank 518
Overall rank 1378
7 days rank 337
Overall rank 1230
7 days rank 377
Overall rank 1130
7 days rank 458
49
« on: January 21, 2009, 05:25 »
Hi leaf
I think it's a great idea.
You are welcome to use my avatar.
Noam
50
« on: January 12, 2009, 12:13 »
hi Jonathan. I'm a bit lost here, either I don't understand the RR concept (regarding pricing) or I don't understand Getty's price policy. If I understood right, you once mentioned about your RR collection, that:
...my returns there are my strongest anywhere...
Wasn't that thanks to a lower price structure on RR than for RM (if this is right)? or was it for more salable images on that collection? And if so, why would Getty set a higher price structure in such an economical time? Hope I made myself clear. I'm confused Noam
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
