Author Topic: Eyeem market (Read 42133 times)

60D · « **Reply #50 on:** May 07, 2016, 10:36 »

Any one has a link to EyeEm agreement with Getty? I'm confused whether they require exclusivity in Getty collection.

MarcvsTvllivs · « **Reply #51 on:** May 08, 2016, 09:55 »

Quote from: 60D on May 07, 2016, 10:36

Any one has a link to EyeEm agreement with Getty? I'm confused whether they require exclusivity in Getty collection.

It's not exclusive anymore.

MichaelJayFoto · « **Reply #52 on:** May 09, 2016, 04:12 »

Quote from: 60D on May 07, 2016, 10:36

Any one has a link to EyeEm agreement with Getty? I'm confused whether they require exclusivity in Getty collection.

They changed the terms in mid April to reflect the new market rules, it's mainly in section 10 of the TOS: https://www.eyeem.com/en/tos

"By adding a photo to EyeEm Market, you additionally grant us the non-exclusive right..."

"In case we require exclusive rights, we will always ask for your consent separately."

60D · « **Reply #53 on:** May 09, 2016, 05:29 »

Quote from: MichaelJayFoto on May 09, 2016, 04:12

Quote from: 60D on May 07, 2016, 10:36
Any one has a link to EyeEm agreement with Getty? I'm confused whether they require exclusivity in Getty collection.

They changed the terms in mid April to reflect the new market rules, it's mainly in section 10 of the TOS: https://www.eyeem.com/en/tos

"By adding a photo to EyeEm Market, you additionally grant us the non-exclusive right..."

"In case we require exclusive rights, we will always ask for your consent separately."

Thank you

KerinF · « **Reply #54 on:** May 15, 2016, 19:27 »

Has anyone noticed any difference in the manner in which images selected for the Collection appear in the Market Dashboard in the transition to the new terms of service? Normally, probably 80-90% of my images were selected for the collection - though some I couldn't agree to because of the exclusivity requirement. I uploaded a batch shortly before the official changeover in terms in mid-May, and I was surprised that none of that batch of images appear in the Collection tab. Especially so, since I have actually started uploading better quality images, and the ones uploaded recently were certainly better than many accepted previously. Is anyone noticing a change in selection criteria? Or is it a reflection that the 'collection' tab isn't updating now that images don't have to be approved?

AlexRvan · « **Reply #55 on:** May 16, 2016, 07:13 »

Quote from: KerinF on May 15, 2016, 19:27

Has anyone noticed any difference in the manner in which images selected for the Collection appear in the Market Dashboard in the transition to the new terms of service?

Yes, I also noticed some changes in the selection. Less photos are accepted into the collection but I'm not sure what the criteria is. It's not sharpness as far as I can tell, and it's not the subject either. I think they are picking the authentic mobile photography pics. Not complaining.

cobalt · « **Reply #56 on:** May 16, 2016, 07:22 »

In a German facebook group a team member said there was a bug they were working to resolve.

We had all noticed that suddenly files where no longer chosen for collection, one artist had 100 files without collection approval, so it looked weird, we couldn´t all have uploaded lower quality at the same time.

Eyeem is working to resolve the bug and our files apparently have been approved in the usual way, they just don´t yet show up under the collection tab.

I asked if I should delete and reupload files, but they asked me not too, better to wait for the tech people to solve the problem for everyone.

KerinF · « **Reply #57 on:** May 16, 2016, 08:29 »

Quote from: cobalt on May 16, 2016, 07:22

In a German facebook group a team member said there was a bug they were working to resolve.

We had all noticed that suddenly files where no longer chosen for collection, one artist had 100 files without collection approval, so it looked weird, we couldn´t all have uploaded lower quality at the same time.

Eyeem is working to resolve the bug and our files apparently have been approved in the usual way, they just don´t yet show up under the collection tab.

I asked if I should delete and reupload files, but they asked me not too, better to wait for the tech people to solve the problem for everyone.

Thank you for this info! Will just wait and see what happens in next few days

cobalt · « **Reply #58 on:** May 17, 2016, 13:38 »

Today the older files were approved for collection, and the same happened to others in the German facebook group.

Looks like they found the bug.

AlexRvan · « **Reply #59 on:** May 19, 2016, 01:16 »

Quote from: cobalt on May 17, 2016, 13:38

Today the older files were approved for collection

Were all your files approved?
A few of my older files passed the approval too but not all of them. I was expecting some of my travel/editorial sharp and in good light photos to pass also.

PedroToledo · « **Reply #60 on:** May 25, 2016, 11:48 »

I´ve just made a sale on Eyeem via Getty, I got $5. I know I get 50% on sales on Eyeem, but, how much do Eyeem get on Getty?

Thank you

cobalt · « **Reply #61 on:** May 25, 2016, 13:05 »

Nobody knows the details of their distribution deals with getty, alamy or whitewall.

It is the same with all the other agencies that work with distributors.

Ignatus · « **Reply #62 on:** May 25, 2016, 13:25 »

Quote from: olafvik on May 25, 2016, 11:48

I´ve just made a sale on Eyeem via Getty, I got $5. I know I get 50% on sales on Eyeem, but, how much do Eyeem get on Getty?

Thank you

I've just made my first sale on Eyeem via Getty. I also got $5.
It's funny because it is an old photo with a canon s90 point and shoot that I really like and would never been accepted by a classical microstock agency.

Dakota · « **Reply #63 on:** May 25, 2016, 16:23 »

If Getty are giving them 20% your sale would only be for $50!

Dook · « **Reply #64 on:** May 25, 2016, 17:12 »

So, they don't check if an image was taken with a digital camera? It doesn't have to be made with a smartphone?

cobalt · « **Reply #65 on:** May 25, 2016, 19:43 »

Itś a photo community built around their smartphone app. So you can upload images taken from your smartphone or you use their webupload and use any camera you like.

It is a community first and I have never heard you must use a smartphone. Most of my pics there were taken with normal digital cameras.

You can also shoot film and scan it.

Dook · « **Reply #66 on:** May 26, 2016, 01:04 »

Quote from: cobalt on May 25, 2016, 19:43

Itś a photo community built around their smartphone app. So you can upload images taken from your smartphone or you use their webupload and use any camera you like.

It is a community first and I have never heard you must use a smartphone. Most of my pics there were taken with normal digital cameras.

You can also shoot film and scan it.

Thank you! I misunderstood the concept.
They look interesting.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Eyeem market (Read 42133 times)

60D

MarcvsTvllivs

MichaelJayFoto

60D

KerinF

AlexRvan

cobalt

KerinF

cobalt

AlexRvan

PedroToledo

cobalt

Ignatus

Dakota

Dook

cobalt

Dook

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors